The ideology is making a successful push due to lack of confidence and respect for our leadership.
(media.greatawakening.win)
🤡 MSM Conspiracy Theory 🤡
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (246)
sorted by:
Or, maybe it's just that the curvature math doesn't work for the size ball we've been told it is. Or, that aircraft never hover in place waiting for their destinations to arrive beneath them. Or, that water will always find level and it cannot stick to a spinning ball under any circumstances.
There are some things here that require better explanation.
I maintain: either the earth is flat or it is a much, much larger ball/other shape than what we've been told (this is problematic too, as it doesn't explain how the amount of gravity needed to make water [a heavy liquid] stick to it, at the same time allows much lighter things to fly around off the surface with ease, like birds/bugs/aircraft).
There are big lies afoot, this much is correct. Lies always make people ask questions.
https://qagg.news/?q=%23%23111
What kind of big picture would put 99 percent of people in the hospital?
Nancy Pelosi nude on a jumbotron? Just spitballin'. 😵
I assume that's the fact that a child rape cult runs the world, every single institution has a corrupt dark side that serves this cult, and all pop culture you've ever consumed is laced with symbolic code about the child rape.
“ that aircraft never hover in place waiting for their destinations to arrive beneath them.”
The planes are spinning too. Its not as if when they leave the earths surface all their momentum created from spin goes away.
Scale is the biggest misconception among flat earthers. Its SO big, until you get really far away, it seems flat. And all construction math works as if it is flat because the scale of building construction is too small to ever account for curvature.
“ he amount of gravity needed to make water [a heavy liquid] stick to it, at the same time allows much lighter things to fly around off the surface with ease, like birds/bugs/aircraft).”
Looks like we could study aerodynamics. i havent but I think I can explain it by flight is achieved by manipulating the air around it. But space ships dont have propellers because there is no air up there.
You accelerate air over a foil to create a negative pressure. The air on top is traveling faster than the air below. Race cars are the opposite; they accelerate air under the car to suck the car down to the ground.
Your comment about momentum of VSTOL aircraft is also correct. Its so stupid for people to say object can't hover above the ground just because the earth is spinning. The aircraft was/is spinning at the same rate as the earth, so of course it can hover and land in the exact same spot... also, in flight we take the curvature of earth into account. It's called the coriolis effect, which also affects fluids. People saying "the math doesn't work" have zero knowledge of math.
Another gravity denialist, perfect: I'm going to be a pedantic college graduate engineer at you.
Water absolutely can stick to a spinning ball: all liquids have some component cohesive and adhesive forces to them. This is what causes the meniscus to form in a tube. It is also what keeps a water column from flowing out of a tube even though nothing is blocking it when the tube is small enough. If you were to take a hydrophilic ball or a ball with a rough or absorbent surface and spin it at a rate of one rotation per day, you're not going to overpower the cohesive and adhesive forces. So absolutely yes, water can stick to a spinning ball. In fact if you're going to throw paint at a canvas you can use a ball on the end of a stick. You dip the ball in the paint and then spin the ball so that the paint never drips off the bottom and then you overpower the cohesive and adhesive forces by flinging the ball at the canvas.
Gravity is not a downward force. Get that concept out of your head: that is not how it works. REPEAT IT WITH ME: gravity is not a downward force, it is in attractive force.
Now beyond my pedantry, if water can't stick to the Earth if it's a ball and spinning: where do you propose the water would go?
Where is down when you're not standing somewhere on the planet and pointing at your feet and saying that's down?
I mean it you're trying to discredit the globe model from within the globe model which is the best way to discredit a theory. Use the theory itself to discredit the theory.
So if it's a ball and water can't stick to it, where does it go? What's the other option? Where is down if pointing at the most extreme local source of gravity and calling that down is not down?