You can't use classification to cover up crimes though.
JFK enters the chat
Yes, they can, and have been for a very very long time. Is it legal? No. Has that stopped them on anything? No. We arent dealing with those who follow law.
The crimes are on a grand scale. Individual people usually don't have enough to prove anything. Also, who exactly would a government employee report crimes to? The whole government is crooked at the top.
That is why theybare coming out as whistle-blowers. That gives them protection, mostly though, their protection is literally sticking together with the other good guys and walking out.
I was just about to chime in. How does this guy have credibility at all? How many larps have been spread by the person bearing this name? I mean...when people are right they are right. But this guy has a long track record that falls well short of impressing me.
If memory serves me correctly, was it not this same dude promoting the idiotic "affidavit" scheme in Nevada that demanded an audit and if they don't respond they owe them 10k a day because this magically morphed into a contract? And suggested people go down to the county recorder's office and file these subjecting people to possible felony charges for filing a false instrument because affidavits are not recordable instruments? Then he acted outraged saying that people faced bogus felony threats for demanding an audit...as if you can just make this crap up as you go along and file whatever you want wasting everyone's time in the process without consequence...
Plus, I'm tired of looking at that damn picture that is so obscured it just forever is associated in my mind as a cartoon that larps.
Sorry for rant. I just don't understand why I keep seeing this guy.
I know he's been around for a long time. I'm just confused why he is some authority. I'm not saying he is wrong about everything. But I've never seen this guy come up with a single thing himself that is not idiotic on a whole other level of the game. By that, I mean anything noteworthy is not an original thought but a retweet/retruth of someone else's thoughts. It has boggled my mind for years that I keep seeing this cartoon face that larps.
I fully understand lots of people seem to like him. I don't dislike him. I just don't think he carries remotely the weight everyone else seems to think. If retweet/retruth someone else's thoughts makes you brilliant, then I suppose he has to be near the top. If having original thoughts/ideas that actually are insightful and/or work, this guy doesn't make the jv team cut to me.
I simply don't believe there will be any whistleblowers in that corrupt agency....not doubting this major patriot....but he is simply repeating something Bannon says.
So this is whether Bannon is correct or simply repeating something he also "heard."
I think it was Spaceshot that gave us Major's real TS account - I trust Spaceshot. It might have been X22 or Truth and Art TV (I watch those 3 mainly and one of them gave Major's TS sorry I can't recall exactly but do think it was Spaceshot).
I've always wondered, if you're a witness to crime, and you don't blow the whistle, are you considered an accomplice? It's definitely like this for sexual harassment and rape in some states -- you witnessed it, you're required by law to notify or become sued for creating an environment conducive of sexual harassment
Naw, my point being that there might be hundreds coming forward but I doubt its in the thousands. The tenor of the story makes it seem that 10K are coming forward, but I don't think so. Just a way the author hypes the story so it can gain traction.
It’s wasn’t long ago when the word “whistleblower” was death to someone. One affidavit could mean life in prison. Nowadays those words barely mean anything. There were over 10,000 affidavits after the election. Many people told there testimonies...and barely anything happened. Same with the whistleblower(s). I hope that once again these things have meaning again. But when they own or seemingly own the “system” it doesn’t go far at all. So many people know the truth. Many have come forward, bravely. I hope one day this all will have meaning.
I love the whistleblowers from Project Veritas. Those folks risk at least their jobs by speaking out, and in the future some might risk their lives. But James puts them out there to tell their story. This is a great beginning point and an educational platform for whistleblowers on how to be treated by a journalist and how the interview is going to be conducted. Plus if they want they can ask for annonimity. Now, it a thousand FBI agents were to walk out of the headquarters building and stand in line with O'keefe, then that will gain some traction. Will this happen, IDK.
Wasn't there a recent report that the FBI is purging conservatives? This would fit, if true...
They were tired of being called faggots
If this is true, without a doubt it would be a white hat operation no doubt.
"Strings Cut" type of thing I would guess
Finally standing up. I could never figure out why the good ones that know let it continue without saying anything.
Because they sign contracts when they get security clearances saying that they can't tell anyone anything or they will go to prison.
You can't use classification to cover up crimes though.
JFK enters the chat
Yes, they can, and have been for a very very long time. Is it legal? No. Has that stopped them on anything? No. We arent dealing with those who follow law.
The crimes are on a grand scale. Individual people usually don't have enough to prove anything. Also, who exactly would a government employee report crimes to? The whole government is crooked at the top.
That is why theybare coming out as whistle-blowers. That gives them protection, mostly though, their protection is literally sticking together with the other good guys and walking out.
Because there probably aren’t any good ones at all. Maybe just a few who are trying to save their own asses.
U may be correct
If true, that could mean dozens of whistle blowers!
BS, is this Hannity's alternate account?
I was just about to chime in. How does this guy have credibility at all? How many larps have been spread by the person bearing this name? I mean...when people are right they are right. But this guy has a long track record that falls well short of impressing me.
If memory serves me correctly, was it not this same dude promoting the idiotic "affidavit" scheme in Nevada that demanded an audit and if they don't respond they owe them 10k a day because this magically morphed into a contract? And suggested people go down to the county recorder's office and file these subjecting people to possible felony charges for filing a false instrument because affidavits are not recordable instruments? Then he acted outraged saying that people faced bogus felony threats for demanding an audit...as if you can just make this crap up as you go along and file whatever you want wasting everyone's time in the process without consequence...
Plus, I'm tired of looking at that damn picture that is so obscured it just forever is associated in my mind as a cartoon that larps.
Sorry for rant. I just don't understand why I keep seeing this guy.
The quote is coming from Bannon, information directly from Gaetz.
go to the 3:15 mark. https://rumble.com/v180727-we-dare-you-merrick-garland-to-move-on-trump.html
He's been around longer than a lot of us and has a proven track record. Search works now, check it out.
I know he's been around for a long time. I'm just confused why he is some authority. I'm not saying he is wrong about everything. But I've never seen this guy come up with a single thing himself that is not idiotic on a whole other level of the game. By that, I mean anything noteworthy is not an original thought but a retweet/retruth of someone else's thoughts. It has boggled my mind for years that I keep seeing this cartoon face that larps.
I fully understand lots of people seem to like him. I don't dislike him. I just don't think he carries remotely the weight everyone else seems to think. If retweet/retruth someone else's thoughts makes you brilliant, then I suppose he has to be near the top. If having original thoughts/ideas that actually are insightful and/or work, this guy doesn't make the jv team cut to me.
I simply don't believe there will be any whistleblowers in that corrupt agency....not doubting this major patriot....but he is simply repeating something Bannon says.
So this is whether Bannon is correct or simply repeating something he also "heard."
I think it was Spaceshot that gave us Major's real TS account - I trust Spaceshot. It might have been X22 or Truth and Art TV (I watch those 3 mainly and one of them gave Major's TS sorry I can't recall exactly but do think it was Spaceshot).
Whistleglowers :-)
ROFL - that's a new one
I've always wondered, if you're a witness to crime, and you don't blow the whistle, are you considered an accomplice? It's definitely like this for sexual harassment and rape in some states -- you witnessed it, you're required by law to notify or become sued for creating an environment conducive of sexual harassment
pollicization: Surgical construction of a substitute thumb?
It's about freaking time. How long can decent men stay silent? Apparently, quite a while.
1443 Jun 10, 2018 11:53:46 PM EDT
———————————- You have a choice. Do what is right. FBI agents willing to testify +24
is this the "rank and file" bs we've heard about for so long?
Thousands means at least 2000
So the rank and file found their balls.
The fbi employs 35 thousand people, with 13-14 thousand being agents spread around the country.
Fuck the FBI. I'd trust a hooker to babysit my kids before I'd trust the FBI to do their damn job and defend the constitution
I'll believe it when I see it! NOT ONE DAMN PERSON HAS SPOKEN UP YET!
I pray its True!
Oh, politicization?
Who are they reporting it to?
Maybe the cabal in the fb8nis as small as it is in the rest of the wold. A faked majority is whatbwe have.
.less than 5 percent run it all.
Thousands mean 1001 or 10586 or 7491. Thousands, huh? Yea, riiiiiiiight.
Does it matter? Would you be happier if it was 10,000? Used to be, just a handful was all that was needed. But now that doesn’t count.
Naw, my point being that there might be hundreds coming forward but I doubt its in the thousands. The tenor of the story makes it seem that 10K are coming forward, but I don't think so. Just a way the author hypes the story so it can gain traction.
It’s wasn’t long ago when the word “whistleblower” was death to someone. One affidavit could mean life in prison. Nowadays those words barely mean anything. There were over 10,000 affidavits after the election. Many people told there testimonies...and barely anything happened. Same with the whistleblower(s). I hope that once again these things have meaning again. But when they own or seemingly own the “system” it doesn’t go far at all. So many people know the truth. Many have come forward, bravely. I hope one day this all will have meaning.
I love the whistleblowers from Project Veritas. Those folks risk at least their jobs by speaking out, and in the future some might risk their lives. But James puts them out there to tell their story. This is a great beginning point and an educational platform for whistleblowers on how to be treated by a journalist and how the interview is going to be conducted. Plus if they want they can ask for annonimity. Now, it a thousand FBI agents were to walk out of the headquarters building and stand in line with O'keefe, then that will gain some traction. Will this happen, IDK.
Haven't seen of heard a single one...