posted ago by Factfiler ago by Factfiler +451 / -0

From Patel Patriot: I got so excited I forgot to even reference what I'm talking about. Trump's official spokeswoman, Liz Harrington, released a 12 page letter from Trump.

It's one big ass devolution-proof.


Comments (152)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
I-AM-ANON 55 points ago +69 / -14

Really? A twelve page letter detailing how the election was outright stolen & that there is institutional capture within our local & state court systems didn’t give you the idea that there is a hardened contingent within our Republic that is engaged in civil war with another one?

Honestly if you are in these comments posting takes like this after having read an open letter that directly accuses the democrats of treason, is headed by ‘President Donald J Trump’ - contains the clear cut quote “we won on November 3rd,” - and ends with NCSWIC paraphrased, I petition for you to be banned. At this point it’s clear that dooming is a sort of addiction among the pessimistic here and you’re either better off getting booted and being a lurker to prompt you to focus on pulling your own life together, or youre a deliberate shill.

deleted 23 points ago +28 / -5
The_Knight_of_sunset 11 points ago +11 / -0

Trump really did his homework with this letter. Bibliography, citations, laying out the facts in a clear and precise manner that is not hard on the eyes, the whole nine yards!

Should be recommended reading for everyone on the side of Trump and America!

Greekish 5 points ago +5 / -0

"Rumors circulated that the Justices devolved to shouting"

This word made me think of devolution.

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
JessWithTheMess 6 points ago +14 / -8

You want him banned... for not agreeing with you? God, help this forum. Not to mention Devolution isn’t even a Q prediction! You guys are acting like Q went away and left y’all in charge... He’s not a shill and people like you are what is pushing anons away from places like this. This is exactly what I’m talking about. Treating skeptics or even berating doomers like shills, and then when their predictions come true, you are quieter than a church mouse, explaining why this loss is actually a win in disguise.

TheNewsCommenter 7 points ago +7 / -0

“You can’t tell them, you have to show them” is Q’s repeated nod to devolution. Patel (Jon) mentions Q only in that he says none of his work is based on it and finds it interesting that it just happens to line up.

GreenLivesMatter 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not that I agree with the banning part, but COG/Devolution would be run by the military, no? And GITMO is where we put foreign terrorists/prisoners of war. Both talked about by Q.

JessWithTheMess 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not necessarily, many thought it was Trump declaring martial law. After he left office, it was believed it was the EO he signed right before leaving office. Devolution is literally just another proposal/theory of what Q meant by military control. It could be, it could be not, but devolution was from our own idea, not mentioned by Q.

I-AM-ANON 2 points ago +3 / -1

No, I want doomers who INSIST on pessimism to be banned, because they are not productive to discussion. When Trump literally signs off with NCSWIC and people get up in the thread with “myh expectations of drastic overnight change” and start detracting from the CLEAR Q proofs present in comms, it’s time to hit the ban. After all the HUNDREDS OF PROOFS you’ve seen if you are on the forum bitching it up about timetables, yes, it’s time to free up the comment feed for persons who are capable of ON TOPIC DISCUSSION.

JessWithTheMess 1 point ago +2 / -1

It’s skepticism about YOUR devolution theory, not a Q proof. This isn’t the first time Trump used NCSWIC, not to mention on publishing’s he made about Durham trial, audits, etc. that did not come into fruition, and the alleged “doomers” were more informative and PROVED accurate and productive, than you and others were about the situation.. So by your logic should the mods ban you? Of course not, because differing opinions matter, even those making blind, unrealistic, hopium-filled predictions/analysis that end up being a nothingburger and distraction. It’s aggravating because you criticize and critique these people, who end up being more correct and realistic about the circumstances were in and the elements at hand, and you wouldn’t bother to even mention or acknowledge when wrong in any instance, or even acknowledge (as we’ve all seen recently) when those “doomers” predictions ended up being right.

I-AM-ANON 1 point ago +2 / -1

Youre making a lot of inferences here that don’t apply: namely what is meant by “devolution” and B) the fact that “doomers were right, and have muh level headed down to earth predictions that aren’t false and hopium filled.”

Youre the one dismissing evidence and insisting your predictions were right. Literally doing an exact 180 of what youre saying.

Doomers IGNORE plentiful and continuing proofs. 5/25 jack resigned. Q525 says goodbye jack. Trump just put out a letter which the third paragraph starts “Seventeen” and ends NCSWIC.

The entire Q phenomenon is based on anons being able to string together crumbs and bake bread.

When you get in here and start shitting in the bread because you want a nice baget fucking hand delivered and won’t put in the cognitive effort to piece it together, youre fucking up the whole board and being a demoralizing bitch.

Doomers aren’t making “down to earth, PROVEN accurate predictions,” — what the fuck are you even talking about? Are you bitching about the Sussman trial? We’ve all established it was a sleight of hand play to get critical evidence introduced, which is consistent with Q. In this situations doomers were also PROVEN wrong.

You see, YOU are the one being willfully ignorant to the comms. Doomers repeatedly shit in breads all over the boards and employ a MO where

They IGNORE PROOFS They IGNORE COMMS they take MSM narratives and announcements at face value

They over all and consistently push PESSIMISM AND DEMORALIZATION.

The shit is fucking annoying and forum slides. It’s honesty bullshit to read a bunch of bitching, but it’s gotten to the point we have to bitch about the bitching.

Either way, this type of behavior isn’t “healthy skepticism” — it’s DEMORALIZATION

it should be a clear rule added to the side bar that continued offenses in this regard is grounds for removal from discussion

10122046 1 point ago +1 / -0

Targeted Misinfo in an Info war is an assault.

Murphy71 4 points ago +4 / -0

Awesome rant. Well said.

Make_It_So 3 points ago +4 / -1

Everything you said is spot on. Except for the ban petition. That was silly, but I get your frustration with the smooth brains.

I-AM-ANON 1 point ago +2 / -1

I’m just saying, a certain amount of “willful dooming” should be grounds to remove people from forum sliding. Or at least temporary ban.

bgny 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dooming is a bannable offense per the rules.

Make_It_So 2 points ago +2 / -0

You one of those unwavering rule followers? Wearing masks was the rule too. Getting the clot shot was the rule too. I don't care for the doomer BS but sometimes people get frustrated, and I can't blame them. Just block em if they get you worked up.

NazisWereSocialist 1 point ago +1 / -0

You still call Bill Clinton President, it does seem to me to make Q references but that’s not necessarily the devolution theory that Biden is an actor right?