Remarkable that people still believe in viruses after all this. P T Barnum was right I guess.
Judy is controlled opposition, whether she realizes it or not (likely not).
Judy was confronted by doctor Andrew Kaufman about a year ago as he pointed out none of her "scientific" papers demonstrated the existence of viruses. I was embarrassed for her as she fumbled and mumbled her way through defending her position. His question was so simple ("Show me a paper where you actually find a virus? I've read all your papers and none demonstrate the existence of any viruses") and her answer was so contorted and complicated as she mumbled her way through all her technical jargon. Sadly the moderator didn't know any better and sided with Judy.
Funny how Stew won't have doctors Stephan Lanka, Andrew Kaufman, Tom Cowan or Sam Bailey on his show, eh? Instead, Judy and doctor Bryan Ardis, who also is unable to defend virology other than saying "there's no way all these virologists could have been this wrong for all these years". Uh Bryan, yeah there is. It's called miseducation and brainwashing.
Judy just rambles, rambles and rambles, can't stop talking - yelling, technical jargon, ugh... The more words, the more deceptions. She's lost in her brainwashing. Sad.
I watched maybe the first 10-12 minutes of the panel discussion and have say that your take on it seems quite accurate. K asks M a direct question and she circles around it with jargon and obfuscation, trying at times to pretend they're saying the same thing (which they're not - he's refuting her premise). The moderator is blatantly pro-narrative (pro Dr. M). I'll try to get back to it and watch the entire thing when I have more time. Thanks for the links.
The premise that Dr. Kaufman, Stefan Lanka, Tom Cowan and Sam & Mark Bailey is so simple; that all these "virologists" are playing with dead monkey kidney cells that are killed by the "cytopathic effect" of adding poisons (anti-biotics) to their "viral culture" toxic soup. Lanka proved it. The original guy who invented the "viral culturing" process (Jon Enders) blatantly admitted it in his seminal "Measles" paper in 1954 where his control experiment (no sick boy fluids) results were INDISTINGUISHABLE from their main experiment (where they DID add the fluids of the boy with measles).
And since 1954, virologists don't run "control experiments" any longer.
The newer computer-generated "viruses" are an even further obfuscation and abstraction into insane virtual reality. They aren't doing any "gene sequencing", where you start with an original strand of real DNA (like of a carrot, mouse, human, etc.) and then snip it up into pieces and insert other pieces of nucleic acids. Instead, they are doing "gene assembling" by taking the artifacts of a sick person's lung fluids and tissues, and literally piecing them together to make up some new "thing" (i.e. "SARS-COV2 Coronavirus"). It's pure fantasy and nonsense as their "new thing" doesn't exist in reality....only in their computer programs (Trinity & MegaHit).
Virologists are now literally inventing virtual reality "Frankensteins" on their computer screens to drive political policy. This is "virology" in a nutshell. 100% pseudoscience nonsense.
I agree. I think Judy is a phony. She still talks about viruses even though Kauffman went through it all with her. Don't forget she was working for years knowing what scums they were !killing millions of Americans through contaminated blood causing cancers she didn't leave...
Not a one of the "dirty dozen" anti-vax crowd - doctors Malone, McCullough, Mercola Martensen, Mikovits, Madej, Tenypenny, Ardis, Cole, Northrup, etc. have addressed the simple points made by doctors Lanka, Kaufman, Cowan, Bailey. They're literally all avoiding it like the plague. Malone did about a 90 second response on an interview where he just said "well of course viruses exist, we've been working with them for years"... and that was about it, as McCullough quietly nodded his head. The questioner didn't have the guts to push him on it by asking what he thought of Lanka's evidence (that all these virologists are just playing with decayed green monkey kidney cells and thinking that they're "viruses".
About 3 months ago, Steve Kirsch invited all of these prominent anti-vax people to do a live debate with Lanka/Kaufman/Cowan/Baileys (Sam & her husband Mark) to "end the controversy that is dividing the community". And the result?
All 5 of the "viruses don't exist" crew agreed to the debate at Steve's convenience. And precisely ZERO of these other "doctors" agreed to take part in it.
As far as I'm concerned, that's case closed. The only conclusion one can draw from this is that "Germ theory" is entirely indefensible --- because it's a fraud.
Thanks for paying attention and doing your own research. If you haven't seen the documentary "the viral delusion" which I posted within these comments, I highly recommend it to solidify your understanding.
Yep, nobody's willing to defend virology against people who know what they're talking about. All they can do is deny and dismiss without any grounds, and continue to defend the 150+ year old lie brought to us by Pasteur.
Steve Kirsch wanted to "shut us all up", sure that his team was right, when he put that request out. Ironically, weekly he complains that nobody is willing to debate him about the deadly effects of the jab. And rightly so, it's indefensible. But he's still sticking to his belief in viruses, even though the same thing he complains about (nobody to defend the jab), is also true for the pro-virus crowd he supports.
As it has been 2 years now since Dr. Lanka wrote his paper "The misconception called virus", I think the case is closed. All the establishment virologists have had more than enough time to refute his findings. But instead, in unison they've all chosen to ignore it.....because they can't refute it.
Yep, he's by the far the clearest and most precise among them. His logic can't be refuted.
Ironically, he's about the only one who consistently says "I'll be happy to change my mind if someone can produce evidence to the contrary". While practically everybody else has just dug their heals into the "germs of the air"....sigh
Remarkable that people still believe in viruses after all this. P T Barnum was right I guess.
Judy is controlled opposition, whether she realizes it or not (likely not).
Judy was confronted by doctor Andrew Kaufman about a year ago as he pointed out none of her "scientific" papers demonstrated the existence of viruses. I was embarrassed for her as she fumbled and mumbled her way through defending her position. His question was so simple ("Show me a paper where you actually find a virus? I've read all your papers and none demonstrate the existence of any viruses") and her answer was so contorted and complicated as she mumbled her way through all her technical jargon. Sadly the moderator didn't know any better and sided with Judy.
Funny how Stew won't have doctors Stephan Lanka, Andrew Kaufman, Tom Cowan or Sam Bailey on his show, eh? Instead, Judy and doctor Bryan Ardis, who also is unable to defend virology other than saying "there's no way all these virologists could have been this wrong for all these years". Uh Bryan, yeah there is. It's called miseducation and brainwashing.
Interesting. Any chance the interview with Andrew Kaufman is available to watch or listen to?
Here's a snippet of it (some guy inserted a bit of his own commentary into it): https://www.bitchute.com/video/oXLqKCVQWIPC/
Judy just rambles, rambles and rambles, can't stop talking - yelling, technical jargon, ugh... The more words, the more deceptions. She's lost in her brainwashing. Sad.
Here's the documentary "The Viral Delusion" (2hrs20min). Pretty much destroys germ theory, certainly the fake virus story. Worth your while to watch if you have the time: https://paradigmshift.uscreen.io/programs/episode-one-narrated-18-no-perth-2-72011-a0209a?categoryId=112764
I watched maybe the first 10-12 minutes of the panel discussion and have say that your take on it seems quite accurate. K asks M a direct question and she circles around it with jargon and obfuscation, trying at times to pretend they're saying the same thing (which they're not - he's refuting her premise). The moderator is blatantly pro-narrative (pro Dr. M). I'll try to get back to it and watch the entire thing when I have more time. Thanks for the links.
Sure thing.
The premise that Dr. Kaufman, Stefan Lanka, Tom Cowan and Sam & Mark Bailey is so simple; that all these "virologists" are playing with dead monkey kidney cells that are killed by the "cytopathic effect" of adding poisons (anti-biotics) to their "viral culture" toxic soup. Lanka proved it. The original guy who invented the "viral culturing" process (Jon Enders) blatantly admitted it in his seminal "Measles" paper in 1954 where his control experiment (no sick boy fluids) results were INDISTINGUISHABLE from their main experiment (where they DID add the fluids of the boy with measles).
And since 1954, virologists don't run "control experiments" any longer.
The newer computer-generated "viruses" are an even further obfuscation and abstraction into insane virtual reality. They aren't doing any "gene sequencing", where you start with an original strand of real DNA (like of a carrot, mouse, human, etc.) and then snip it up into pieces and insert other pieces of nucleic acids. Instead, they are doing "gene assembling" by taking the artifacts of a sick person's lung fluids and tissues, and literally piecing them together to make up some new "thing" (i.e. "SARS-COV2 Coronavirus"). It's pure fantasy and nonsense as their "new thing" doesn't exist in reality....only in their computer programs (Trinity & MegaHit).
Virologists are now literally inventing virtual reality "Frankensteins" on their computer screens to drive political policy. This is "virology" in a nutshell. 100% pseudoscience nonsense.
Many thanks, muchly appreciated!
Sure thing!
I agree. I think Judy is a phony. She still talks about viruses even though Kauffman went through it all with her. Don't forget she was working for years knowing what scums they were !killing millions of Americans through contaminated blood causing cancers she didn't leave...
Bingo.
Not a one of the "dirty dozen" anti-vax crowd - doctors Malone, McCullough, Mercola Martensen, Mikovits, Madej, Tenypenny, Ardis, Cole, Northrup, etc. have addressed the simple points made by doctors Lanka, Kaufman, Cowan, Bailey. They're literally all avoiding it like the plague. Malone did about a 90 second response on an interview where he just said "well of course viruses exist, we've been working with them for years"... and that was about it, as McCullough quietly nodded his head. The questioner didn't have the guts to push him on it by asking what he thought of Lanka's evidence (that all these virologists are just playing with decayed green monkey kidney cells and thinking that they're "viruses".
About 3 months ago, Steve Kirsch invited all of these prominent anti-vax people to do a live debate with Lanka/Kaufman/Cowan/Baileys (Sam & her husband Mark) to "end the controversy that is dividing the community". And the result?
All 5 of the "viruses don't exist" crew agreed to the debate at Steve's convenience. And precisely ZERO of these other "doctors" agreed to take part in it.
As far as I'm concerned, that's case closed. The only conclusion one can draw from this is that "Germ theory" is entirely indefensible --- because it's a fraud.
Thanks for paying attention and doing your own research. If you haven't seen the documentary "the viral delusion" which I posted within these comments, I highly recommend it to solidify your understanding.
Cheers!
Damn. I did not know about this. I haven't watched the videos posted but hearing this commentary is... compounding.
Yep, nobody's willing to defend virology against people who know what they're talking about. All they can do is deny and dismiss without any grounds, and continue to defend the 150+ year old lie brought to us by Pasteur.
Steve Kirsch wanted to "shut us all up", sure that his team was right, when he put that request out. Ironically, weekly he complains that nobody is willing to debate him about the deadly effects of the jab. And rightly so, it's indefensible. But he's still sticking to his belief in viruses, even though the same thing he complains about (nobody to defend the jab), is also true for the pro-virus crowd he supports.
As it has been 2 years now since Dr. Lanka wrote his paper "The misconception called virus", I think the case is closed. All the establishment virologists have had more than enough time to refute his findings. But instead, in unison they've all chosen to ignore it.....because they can't refute it.
Elvis has left the building...
I agree. Kaufman has been clear and precise and making a lot of sense since day one of this coof shit show. Virus? What virus? How about exosomes?
Yep, he's by the far the clearest and most precise among them. His logic can't be refuted.
Ironically, he's about the only one who consistently says "I'll be happy to change my mind if someone can produce evidence to the contrary". While practically everybody else has just dug their heals into the "germs of the air"....sigh