Julian Assange Extradition=GO!
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (90)
sorted by:
The Founding Fathers were criminals by definition too, get your head out of authority's ass.
This.
Sometimes being a criminal is the only moral thing. I believe in the rule of law but at some point, you may be put in the position to choose between morality and law. in a just society law helps morality express itself but society is not always just.
Culture isn't the barometer.
The founding fathers wrote the Constitution so that the document would be ever lasting through the changes of time. They knew from their own 'living through Hell' experiences under a tyrannical regime it most likely would and could happen over and over, again and again.
And here we are, defending what was written 200+ years ago.
The Constitution is biblical in a sense and protects humanity in our nation from the evils of the world, including our own from within.
Well now fella or fellette watch your mouf.
Riddle me this then; if Ashli Babbit broke into your house and then was breaking into your locked bedroom as you warned her not to do so what would you do? And remember at the time you don't know who she is or why she's breaking in and why she doesn't stop EVEN after being warned you will shoot...
I'll riddle you and step in it too. How about this, evacuate the building and give ground. You know, kinda like the kid glove treatment the actual insurrectionist DS antifa & blm get. She was murdered. Period.
Are you suggesting government should abdicate?
Rule of Law is gone, you have convinced me, it is now law of the jungle I reckon.
You do know our government has been taken over after a decades long infiltration from the enemy. They literally stole 2020 and people were pissed and protested it.
Never happened
https://www.bitchute.com/video/qyDhHI2Ya4Ns/
How about she wasn't shot? She might be dead now for all I know, but that black guy in a suit didn't shoot her. Slow motion replay of the video shows that he turned his gun away from her, fired down the hall, then quickly turned the gun back toward her. Anyone really shot in the neck would have been bleeding like a stuck pig immediately. She did show a drop of red until her helper stuck in his hand and made it happen. Also the crowd didn't break into the Capitol. The capitol police opened the doors and pointed the way for them to go. In other words, they were actually invited in.
I watched the videos that day, and many times since. I spoke to people who were there in real time as they fought their way out, upstream against the crowd surging the fence and breaking it down. Yeah 'some' alleged coppers did open gates, also on camera as we saw in real time that day. And we saw CNN and BLM clowns parading in and discussing it on camera.
Yeppers. The crowd did break in, they all knew barriers were in place to keep a secure perimeter and they all knew it was being breached.
If they claim different they are crazy, which more than a few of them are seemingly. They all knew they were interrupting Congress, that they were not on a public tour, that violences were occurring.
I'd pardon most of them but they did breach the peace, they did interrupt government, they did do violences and they did harm our cause.
They didn't "interrupt government." Many of the people who claimed to fear for their lives, such as AOC, weren't even in the building. The only people who did real violence were the Antifa and BLM with perhaps some FBI mixed in. Photos have been positively identified.
It's not your house, it's a public building, with hundreds of guards and there were dozens of people who could take one woman down and no one, not one, in that chamber, who was remotely in danger. The House was threatened when the Puerto Ricans showed up, but not one member was in danger on Jan 6th.
I will riddle you this. If three police officers were standing directly behind Ashli Babbit would you still shot her? Look at the video. https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com/newly-released-footage-shows-ashli-babbitt-begging-capitol-police-to-intervene-with-rioters//
I saw the video many times, from several angles. People don't wanna think for themselves I guess.
Ok, simple run down then. Yes there were armed security personnel behind her as well as in front of her, and she kept coming even as those armed people all told her to stop.
From the perspective of security... she was guilty of breaching security, she was carrying a backpack with unknown contents, she attempted to breach inner security even as she saw armed security telling her she would be shot if she kept coming. She kept coming - you have to hionor the threat. Was she gonna trigger a biological weapon, a labomba, pull our a bottle of urine and toss it around...?
They had to honor the threat she represented, based on ALL the facts of the moment.
Fact - she violated the Capitol, breached outer security.
Fact- she kept coming even as armed security warned her of mortal anger - WHY would a sane person do that? So the cops had to consider she had a Mission, an agenda, perhaps a weapon...
Yes, I would have shot her. If she broke into your house and then tried to break into your bedroom as you warned her not to you would shoot also, or should.
If we wish to be a nation which enjoys the Rule of Law we must respect and enforce Law. Everyone seems to want to emote rather than reason, but I am convinced- we are no longer a nation which desires the Rule of Law it seems.
https://files.catbox.moe/e4h2uj.jpg
Sorry you whole argument falls apart with one basic fact. The security behind her could have taken her down at any point. They had a better view of the situation. Shooting her should have been the last option NOT the first option. She pasted right by the three armed guards before she was shot. So this nonsense about her being a threat makes no sense. Otherwise they would have stopped her.
Even up to the point of her being shot they could have tackled her to the ground. They did not
the murderer who shot her shot into the direction of the other officers. How does that make sense?
all members of congress had already been moved to another location so why was it so important to shot her before the other security guys could tackle her if they needed to?
Deez