To make it especially clear, this is not a lawsuit on election integrity.
It's a suit which challenged the ability of the State to intervene on election cases. Which makes sense, because it's the State that will have implemented the Election Standards to begin with, so of course they can intervene to uphold them.
The speaker of the North Carolina State House of Representatives and the president pro tempore of the North Carolina State Senate are entitled to intervene in this litigation challenging North Carolina's voter-ID law.
In effect, it means if the State catches people not following the law, Liberal Judges can't file a string of injunctions to let people ignore the law. Now it's a settled matter of the court, so the STATE LAW must be upheld, or people get gotted for voter fraud.
That just fixed a lot but, this means people who should have known better violated our constitutional right under color of authority. Those judges should be fired, disbarred and open to civil litigation for every voters affected in his jurisdiction. If he took money or favors then he gets prison.
Only if they intervene to defend the laws they passed.
They can't intervene when someone says they aren't following the laws they passed, because they're the ones getting sued.
Intervening basically just means "the outcome of this suit between two separate parties might damage our party in some way, so we need to intervene to show the court where we stand and why a ruling to one of these parties unjustly might effect our party." At least, that's how lawyers see it.
In reality, it kinda looks like NAACP sued the wrong people over Voter ID laws not because the laws were unconstitutional, but because the Governor didn't have a successful veto of them.
Another way of putting it is this: "We sued the Governor who vetoed the bill like we wanted but it didn't work, so it's his fault."
Of course the House and Senate have a reason to intervene, because it's petty and stupid as hell, even if they don't care much about the Governor.
I am a bit confused. So does this mean that NC now has voter ID? We voted for it in 2018 and it passed by the majority votes of the people of NC. But the liberal judges here have been blocking it from becoming official law since.
Kinda. If the State Senators and Reps do their job on the intervening, then the initial case can go forward and then nowhere so that Voter ID can be implemented.
This merely allows the State Senators and Reps to stop those judges from filing back-to-back injunctions.
I could be wrong on the semantics, but that's my takeaway. Again, the case has nothing to do with Voter ID, just whether or not the State Senators and Reps can intervene and cut out the judge's bullshit.
Personally, I don't think the Democrats have enough money to rig another election, though they still may try.
China sure as hell isn't gonna print all the fake ballots pro-bono. They are on the verge of economic collapse with bank runs all over the place right now. You're telling me they can fire up the presses again to make some fake ballots for Sleepy Joe's party?!
They'd have to print enough to build a land bridge across the Pacific, and brother, let me tell ya, there's no chance that much paper is gonna make it to China with the shipping industry as stalled as it is.
Well they do have money-laundering and all these donations going to Ukraine, is most likely being used to support the Democrats? Just a theory I have that all these big time worthy causes we keep hearing about might actually being used to support something else.
In fact just the other day my Dad got a phone call from someone, who was asking for donations to help cure cancer. I doubt that dude was on the level and I encouraged my Dad not to send them money!
My point don't get cocky and be prepared to prep your family and friends for anything that might happen/ even if that means voting...
I was just reading through a bit of it.
To make it especially clear, this is not a lawsuit on election integrity.
It's a suit which challenged the ability of the State to intervene on election cases. Which makes sense, because it's the State that will have implemented the Election Standards to begin with, so of course they can intervene to uphold them.
In effect, it means if the State catches people not following the law, Liberal Judges can't file a string of injunctions to let people ignore the law. Now it's a settled matter of the court, so the STATE LAW must be upheld, or people get gotted for voter fraud.
Thank you.
Thanks Sleepy! You are like a cozy best fren!
There must be a stoned sleepy Pepe in honor of this pede
That just fixed a lot but, this means people who should have known better violated our constitutional right under color of authority. Those judges should be fired, disbarred and open to civil litigation for every voters affected in his jurisdiction. If he took money or favors then he gets prison.
Thanks fren.
Does it also mean, that in a blue state. The state can step in and prevent the right thing from happening?
Only if they intervene to defend the laws they passed.
They can't intervene when someone says they aren't following the laws they passed, because they're the ones getting sued.
Intervening basically just means "the outcome of this suit between two separate parties might damage our party in some way, so we need to intervene to show the court where we stand and why a ruling to one of these parties unjustly might effect our party." At least, that's how lawyers see it.
In reality, it kinda looks like NAACP sued the wrong people over Voter ID laws not because the laws were unconstitutional, but because the Governor didn't have a successful veto of them.
Another way of putting it is this: "We sued the Governor who vetoed the bill like we wanted but it didn't work, so it's his fault."
Of course the House and Senate have a reason to intervene, because it's petty and stupid as hell, even if they don't care much about the Governor.
There are NO blue states.
"WRONG!" - Dominion
Well, there’s that.
I get what you're saying, but I think unfortunately Hawaii is definitely blue. Reading some of these pieces of shit makes me cringe in disbelief
https://www.reddit.com/r/Hawaii/comments/stbr1a/mask_mandate_end_date/
As a resident of the state of Washington, I regretfully beg to differ. Our entire state government is Democrat-controlled. We suffer constantly.
Because they stole it.
Ever since mail in voting, no?
I am a bit confused. So does this mean that NC now has voter ID? We voted for it in 2018 and it passed by the majority votes of the people of NC. But the liberal judges here have been blocking it from becoming official law since.
Kinda. If the State Senators and Reps do their job on the intervening, then the initial case can go forward and then nowhere so that Voter ID can be implemented.
This merely allows the State Senators and Reps to stop those judges from filing back-to-back injunctions.
I could be wrong on the semantics, but that's my takeaway. Again, the case has nothing to do with Voter ID, just whether or not the State Senators and Reps can intervene and cut out the judge's bullshit.
I know you can't always stay awake, but you sure make good use of awake time. Thank God for you sleepydude.
Very good... Now let's hope we can keep this around long enough/ if and when the 2022 Midterms take place?
Personally, I don't think the Democrats have enough money to rig another election, though they still may try.
China sure as hell isn't gonna print all the fake ballots pro-bono. They are on the verge of economic collapse with bank runs all over the place right now. You're telling me they can fire up the presses again to make some fake ballots for Sleepy Joe's party?!
They'd have to print enough to build a land bridge across the Pacific, and brother, let me tell ya, there's no chance that much paper is gonna make it to China with the shipping industry as stalled as it is.
Well they do have money-laundering and all these donations going to Ukraine, is most likely being used to support the Democrats? Just a theory I have that all these big time worthy causes we keep hearing about might actually being used to support something else.
In fact just the other day my Dad got a phone call from someone, who was asking for donations to help cure cancer. I doubt that dude was on the level and I encouraged my Dad not to send them money!
My point don't get cocky and be prepared to prep your family and friends for anything that might happen/ even if that means voting...