Shall NOT be infringed. The Constitution couldn’t be any clearer. If you can pull a trigger, you can own a gun, period. Doesn’t matter if you’re in jail, out of jail, 80 or 8.
Ah even in background checks it doesn't show up? My friend worked in an administrative role in a school, expunging really helps. But I have no idea how the process works or how expensive it is. Sucks that possessing a plant gets you so much trouble.
If you're not commiting any sort of crime that gives probable cause, and you don't allow them to search your home or car... then they can never get you for it.
Edit: seriously, why do we worship the police state? Why do we let them tell us which rights we are allowed to enjoy?
Get your arms ready the lunatics will be out soon. But remember everything that has been happening proves WE ARE IN THE MAJORITY, not them like msm would have you believe. This is a Great day and it's even FRIDAY TOO
Then I hope it happens very soon. Everyone around here has been so busy doing handsprings over the SCOTUS abortion decision that the "gun control" bill that just got passed by our demoncrat/RINO kangaroo kongress is goind almost unnoticed.
I never understood the point of the ATF. Supposedly, they are to reduce the number of illicit/illegal weapons obtained by gangs and criminals, but they don't seem to be doing their jobs properly. Actually, I'm beginning to wonder if they've been supplying the weapons to the mass shooters
So without getting beyond what anyone feels like reading, I am not a fan of the gun case reasoning. You won't find a stronger 2a proponent than me. Suffice to say, that case was bullshit reasoning. The second amendment does not imply anything, nor does it condition anything. It means what it says. The right to keep and bear arms. There is no "self defense" qualifier. It does not opine on the permissible purposes. In plain language, it unconditionally grants the right to keep and bear arms. Running the majority's logic tree down to the end results in the absurd.
And think about how if 2a means the right to self defense with a firearm, do you really have a right if it hinges on the government's definition of self defense? After all, we have varying differences and nuances in each state's laws governing permissible self defense circumstances. Which state is correct? Which ones are too narrow? See what I mean when you open the door to a shit show thru faulty reasoning?
Aside from this, what has gone unnoticed is Justice Barrett's concurrence. Upon first glance, it appears unremarkable. If you haven't read the reasoning of the majority opinion, Barrett's concurrence won't leap out at you as anything of interest. But in the context of what the majority just held and how they got there, rethink what she just said. It is a big deal.
They are already abolished. They were nevee constitutional. Having the SC recognize that would be nice. It should bring the price of guns back down to their natural prices.
Shall NOT be infringed. The Constitution couldn’t be any clearer. If you can pull a trigger, you can own a gun, period. Doesn’t matter if you’re in jail, out of jail, 80 or 8.
It what if….. I go to Harvard and yell really really loud? - David “Muh vagina hurts” Hogg
Would be nice to legally own a firearm again.
I was convicted of possessing a plant that was illegal
Over 15 years ago
You are a free man. Own a gun to protect to yourself.
Sounds good, until you're looking at 5 years fed time
Can't you get it expunged?
Maybe, if I have a pile of cash to dump into a lawyer's liquor fund
A friend of mine got caught selling ecstasy pills when he was 18. Dod 2 years and served 5 on probation I believe, if not a bit more.
10 years later, I believe, he was able to get it expunged and passed background checks for a job that he would not have been able to obtain otherwise.
Since mine is over 10, it is hard for the cops to find it. I could probably get it expunged, but lack the cash for the lawyer
Ah even in background checks it doesn't show up? My friend worked in an administrative role in a school, expunging really helps. But I have no idea how the process works or how expensive it is. Sucks that possessing a plant gets you so much trouble.
Pot? It's legal now in several states. Would suck if that's what you were convicted on
Yup.
Congratulations, you have nothing to lose if you get caught with a gun. What, are you going to be a double felon?
Arm up, brother.
5 years federal crime if I have a firearm in my home or car.
That they find...
How often have police searched your home or car?
If you're not commiting any sort of crime that gives probable cause, and you don't allow them to search your home or car... then they can never get you for it.
Edit: seriously, why do we worship the police state? Why do we let them tell us which rights we are allowed to enjoy?
It only takes once to lose 5 years of my life.
I.e. Car accident? 5 years.
Get your arms ready the lunatics will be out soon. But remember everything that has been happening proves WE ARE IN THE MAJORITY, not them like msm would have you believe. This is a Great day and it's even FRIDAY TOO
The NY decision has opened the Pandora's box to repeal ALL gun restrictions as well as abolishing concealed carry permits, enter Constitutional carry!
Then I hope it happens very soon. Everyone around here has been so busy doing handsprings over the SCOTUS abortion decision that the "gun control" bill that just got passed by our demoncrat/RINO kangaroo kongress is goind almost unnoticed.
Everything they "passed" will be deamed unconsititional according to the 2A decision. Pandoras box is open.
I never understood the point of the ATF. Supposedly, they are to reduce the number of illicit/illegal weapons obtained by gangs and criminals, but they don't seem to be doing their jobs properly. Actually, I'm beginning to wonder if they've been supplying the weapons to the mass shooters
I could use a few supressors but I've never been a fan of the added hoops i'd have to jump through.
gotta wait until it doesn't free up money for dems to waste on woke shit.
So without getting beyond what anyone feels like reading, I am not a fan of the gun case reasoning. You won't find a stronger 2a proponent than me. Suffice to say, that case was bullshit reasoning. The second amendment does not imply anything, nor does it condition anything. It means what it says. The right to keep and bear arms. There is no "self defense" qualifier. It does not opine on the permissible purposes. In plain language, it unconditionally grants the right to keep and bear arms. Running the majority's logic tree down to the end results in the absurd.
And think about how if 2a means the right to self defense with a firearm, do you really have a right if it hinges on the government's definition of self defense? After all, we have varying differences and nuances in each state's laws governing permissible self defense circumstances. Which state is correct? Which ones are too narrow? See what I mean when you open the door to a shit show thru faulty reasoning?
Aside from this, what has gone unnoticed is Justice Barrett's concurrence. Upon first glance, it appears unremarkable. If you haven't read the reasoning of the majority opinion, Barrett's concurrence won't leap out at you as anything of interest. But in the context of what the majority just held and how they got there, rethink what she just said. It is a big deal.
They are already abolished. They were nevee constitutional. Having the SC recognize that would be nice. It should bring the price of guns back down to their natural prices.
NYC Mayor promises to ignore SC ruling on concealed gun laws
Nullify all state gun laws that contravention the 2nd.
Amen