Eratosthenes experiment works on a flat earth and globe earth. Show me evidence of gas pressure without a container. Because science! You sound like a liberal cuck trying to tell me about vaccines.
The atmosphere has gas pressure without a container, thanks to gravity (like any other planet). What relationship does that have to flat vs. globular Earth? (Other than that it works with a globular Earth but makes no sense for a flat Earth.)
Eratosthenes was correct about a globular Earth. Which was proven for a fact by circumnavigation. You really can't get your head around that, can you? Circumnavigation is the most "hand's-on" evidence you can get, and you wish to brush that off. It is conclusive.
That and the fact that the cartography of the Earth cannot be reconciled by a flat projection, but only by a spherical projection. Also, by being on the other side of the Earth we can see the other half of the constellations. Not possible on a flat Earth.
Your entire predication is based on a book from (supposedly) two thousand years ago telling you something is a certain way, and everything else that states otherwise is "pseudoscience"
That doesn't even approach science.
It's pretty sad that every stupid theory imaginable has corrupted this movement so effectively.
Yeah, you're right, but I have to point out the hypocrisy. I've had it in with that guy before and he is a complete moron. So I have no respect for him.
I've had this conversation with you already. You're too indoctrinated to have a conversation with.
No indoctrination. Just physics and geography. You refuse to face facts. We are no different from any other planet (spherical).
So far all you've mentioned is pseudoscience.
Eratosthenes experiment works on a flat earth and globe earth. Show me evidence of gas pressure without a container. Because science! You sound like a liberal cuck trying to tell me about vaccines.
"So far all you've mentioned is pseudoscience."
You misspelled I've.
The atmosphere has gas pressure without a container, thanks to gravity (like any other planet). What relationship does that have to flat vs. globular Earth? (Other than that it works with a globular Earth but makes no sense for a flat Earth.)
Eratosthenes was correct about a globular Earth. Which was proven for a fact by circumnavigation. You really can't get your head around that, can you? Circumnavigation is the most "hand's-on" evidence you can get, and you wish to brush that off. It is conclusive.
That and the fact that the cartography of the Earth cannot be reconciled by a flat projection, but only by a spherical projection. Also, by being on the other side of the Earth we can see the other half of the constellations. Not possible on a flat Earth.
Under FE theory circumnavigation is just circlenavigation.
Your entire predication is based on a book from (supposedly) two thousand years ago telling you something is a certain way, and everything else that states otherwise is "pseudoscience"
That doesn't even approach science.
It's pretty sad that every stupid theory imaginable has corrupted this movement so effectively.
Huh? I never said the Bible is my proof. If anything I said the Bible has been corrupted many times over with every translation there's been.
"Liberal cuck" is a poor choice of words, and it weakens, not strengthens you position. which I agree with overall.
Yeah, you're right, but I have to point out the hypocrisy. I've had it in with that guy before and he is a complete moron. So I have no respect for him.