Cellular Immunologist: The Vaccines “Can’t Work” Because COVID Is A “Common Cold Virus”
(libertywire.net)
⚠️ Vax-TYRANNY ☠️
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (90)
sorted by:
Professor Edward J. Steele, who is an Australian molecular and cellular immunologist, geneticist, and microbiologist, says the COVID-19 “vaccines “can’t work” because the disease they are meant to prevent is a “common cold virus.” Steele said: “I’ve got to stress: this is a common cold virus, 99.9% of people get rid of it.”
In a similar style to Dr. Mike Yeadon, not is Steele talking about scientific fact and logical deduction but calling out his dishonest colleagues and ignorant, corrupt politicians. Steele says that the vaccines can’t work because a jab in the arm can’t stimulate a mucosal antibody response in the nose, mouth, and intestinal tract where they are needed to neutralize the virus before it can enter cells and replicate. This is the path to natural immunity for those who have something like a common cold, which all COVID-19 is, all it has ever been, and why a “vaccine” isn’t possible to prevent a cold.
But now all these vaxxed people have acquired original antigenic sin and will have worse and worse reactions each time they get the cold.
Just imagine all these people are going to get their immune systems completely worn out and ultimately die - from a cold.
I think this will be the “dark winter” that Biden said all the unvaxxed will witness.
They are starving the world of fuel, in time for a manufactured "Cold Winter".
True.
No, the reason they can't work is because there is no virus for them to "work on."
There is nothing to "get rid of." People simply get sick due to personal lifestyle choices, toxins and poisons in their environment, and they tend to detox more during a time of year when natural vitamin D levels are low.
True.
No, the concept of an antibody response having ANY health benefit has NEVER BEEN PROVEN IN ANY SCIENTIFIC STUDY.
NEVER.
Antibodies most likely are created when ANY foreign protein enters the body, possibly as one way to help the body get rid of it, but that does not mean it necessarily does anything regarding a future encounter of a similar foreign protein.
Maybe so, maybe not. The point is: This "antibody makes you immune" narrative is MADE UP. There is NO scientific basis for it.
Again, this is ALL THEORETICAL. There has NEVER been any scientific study that PROVES this happens in people. NEVER.
There is no such thing as "natural immunity." It is simply a matter of toxins/poisons or not. MOST people today live in a toxic environment and eat a diet that causes toxins to build inside the body. At some point, they build up enough that the body needs to detox, which are the symptoms of illness.
Those of you at the GAW who do not yet understand HOW virologists claim to know anything about "viruses," are NOT AWAKE.
Spend a few hours educating yourselves, and stop falling for ALL the lies, even the ones who seem to be anti-narrative, but in reality are just fueling the lies.
Good job. We will convince them eventually,
Nice work MAG768720!!!
we just Peons boss, so sorry, but thankyou for the effort and a free updoot.
Wrong answer. DO NOT LET ANYONE TELL YOU THAT YOU CANNOT UNDERSTAND SOMETHING and don't you dare lie to me by repeating it.
+1
No, We the People ARE the boss.
We all need to start ACTING like it.
A "virus" is the perfect fear porn mechanism....can't see it, can't replicate it, were debunked long ago by decent people.
Isn't it interesting how the sheeple totally miss that inconvenient fact: it always did take years for their "vaccines" to be produced and yet, they're now all out the door in a ridiculously short period of time? AND, no more stamp of approval due to their fake trials and testing.....AND now "experimental" which they always were anyway but they don't even hide that any more.
Their fake virus was far more effective than their fake terrorists.
Disgustingly so.....
YES....THIS ^^
Well, either:
Don't you think this is kind of a BIG DEAL -- to know whether or not such a thing exists in the first place?
Yes.
So ... why are you hedging your statement here? Why haven't YOU done the research to reach a conclusion on this very important issue?
We have a fundamental disagreement. And that is OK.
You want to slowly get into the swimming pool, over a period of time, because you think it will be less shocking.
I, on the other hand, want to dive right in. I think the actual shock will be less than expected.
When you tell people there is no virus to be afraid of, some will roll their eyes, some will be shocked but have no other response, and some will ask WHY you think that.
The first two groups are not ready to know the truth, and that includes anything that is different from what their "experts" (whom they worship) say. Those people are not interested (at least, not yet) about what the truth really is.
The third group that asks why, can be willing to have it explained. Some of those poeple won't get it, and will move on, BUT the fire is lit. And then there are others who want MORE info, and they will awaken.
The more people who awaken, the quicker we get to correcting the shit show.
This is what I have observed when talking to a lot of different people about it.
We say "viruses don't exist" because nobody has ever provided a shred of proof that they do exist. It's all really quite simple. The entire fields of virology, bacteriology and immunology are massive frauds. And not a single "expert" from any of these fields has even made an attempt to refute the findings of Dr. Lanka (former virologist) for over 2 years now. Thus, it's game, set and match. The only choice the supporters of germ theory have is to continue to ignore the truth.
The reason this is so hard to accept is because at one point or another, most everybody believes they "caught a virus" from a family member, co-worker, stranger, etc. But that's not what happens. And when you tell them what actually happens, a massive wave of anger and cognitive dissonance usually results.
We have been brainwashed into a state of fear and victim consciousness since birth. Accepting this simple and obvious fact is a big step toward freedom and liberation.
P.S. The Koch's Postulates argument is valid, but we're long past using this as a primary argument, as nobody knows what they are and don't usually have the attention span to have them explained. And for the record, they also fail for all attempts to prove that bacteria are contagious as well. Thus, contagion is a myth and germ theory is a hoax. The sooner the masses figure this out, the sooner we free ourselves from tyranny.
So what are you going to tell them when the next "viral scamdemic" is rammed down our throats in the coming months? Maybe killer-hornet-virus is next?
I'm not criticizing you in any way. I appreciate that you're awake and aware of the scam. But a defensive approach puts us in a weak position for all their future scamdemics, that's all. Quack-cines aside, if they can convince more than 50% of the population that there's a deadly unicorn floating around out there, then they can do all the lockdown, masking, distancing etc. nonsense all over again. Thus, I like to nip this bud at the highest upstream spot possible.
Just sayin...keep up the pink-pilling!
Let's take a step back to January 2020, when the Coof thing got rolling.
At that moment in history, Lanka had not yet done his experiment, which proved that viruses do not exist, and that it is the method that virologists use which actually CREATES the so-called "virus" in a lab, which is what they are looking at.
His work was not done until April 2021.
So, in January 2020, you and I and the entire world did not know that viruses really do not exist. (There might have been a few globalist parasites who act as puppetmasters who already knew this, but it was pretty much nobody else).
Even Stefan Lanka had this kind of figured out a few years ago, but didn't say anything because he thought he would be perceived as a kook.
It was only when he did his study, and also won victory in the German courts over his 100,000 Euro reward for proof of measles virus (someone tried to provide proof and claim the reward, but ultimately could not prove it in court), that he knew for sure.
And he was a professionally-trained virologist. The rest of us had no clue.
In January 2020, I thought the virus was real, but that face masks were a joke. The reason I did not take the vaxx was not because I knew all the problems, but because I was skeptical about vaccines in general. But I also was not interested in biology. The subject never really interested me.
But I soon realized that the face masks were not effective, and that the lockdowns were not only unlawful but not effective. I figured this out as a non-scientist and simply being skeptical.
I'm sure many here were the same.
But in late 2020/early 2021, I read the Pfizer fake studies and realized they didn't prove anything. Then, the VAERS reports came in, claiming many injuries from the fake vaxx.
It wasn't until late 2021 that I discovered the work of Lanka and his funders, Cowan and Kaufmann (maybe a few others, too).
And it wasn't until I STUDIED ... for a few HOURS ... to really understand what they were saying.
ANYONE is capable of doing this.
But most don't even know that such information exists.
Our job is not to prove what has already been proven by those who funded and did the research.
Our job is to be a conduit for people to find this for themselves.
The more people who do, and the faster they do, the better off we will all be.
So, I say hit them over the head with a 2x4. Those who stand there and still want to discuss it are the ones we focus on. Later, they will find others to join us, who will find others to join us, etc.
We are all resistent to new ideas that are counter to what we believe we already know. I was, too.
But that can change. It's just a matter of who is ready NOW to know, and who is not. Find out by shocking them, and then work with the ones who are ready NOW.
They ARE out there. I have found some myself. The others who are not ready can go live in fear until they have heard enough people saying the virus does not exist that they decide they are ready to understand why so many people are saying such a "dumb" thing.
You are 100% correct. I have yet to win someone over right out of the gate. But I have convinced people to look into it (by suggesting some videos) and I've won over at least a dozen this past year after they did so.
In my experience, I've found the hardline approach is the only way forward. As long as people believe in unicorn germs, they're SCARED. And if they're scared, they'll do crazy things in an effort to curtail their fears. That includes all the ludicrous behavior we've ween these past 2.5 years, which I believe, at least until this point, has caused more damage (economic, self-esteem, suicides, child brain development, etc.) than the jab damage.
So that's the gist of my angle. And I totally agree with you, I've definitely pissed off a ton of people too. Cognitive dissonance can get ugly!
I will say this. Telling somebody "viruses don't exist" stops them in their tracks. They have no grounds to argue, which short-circuits their knee-jerk responses to any sort of "anti-vaxxer" arguments. And at this point, I'm finding that causing a "glitch in their matrix" is more effective than all the softball approaches I've tried in the past combined. I don't think I've won over a single person with "the jab could be dangerous" approach yet.