What’s with these posts lately? I just made this comment on another claim last night.
“I do long exposure astrophotography.
If you take a long exposure photo of the night sky from the north pole the observer sees the stars appear to rotate as circular light streaks around a point directly overhead, where the Earth's rotational axis intersects the sky at the north celestial pole.
An observer located at a mid northern latitude (say 30°) sees the north celestial pole elevated 30° above his northern horizon.
Care to guess what an observer at the equator sees?
Because under a geocentric model, we are stationary and the stars rotate above. The heliocentric model says that our 23.4 degrees of tilt is angled towards Polaris, thus it appears to be stationary with all stars rotating around it.
Globe earthers read this and go ‘just a coincidence’, because their entire metaphysics is ‘coincidence’. They believe that life began by coincidence. They believe that their consciousness is a coincidence. 66.6 implies meaning. They deny all meaning. It’s nilhilism.
I'm not sure why you're mentioning that at all. Nothing to do with the topic at hand. We're talking about Antarctica. Do you have any comments on the image or Antarctica in general?
Why are there cold and hot spots on a flat Earth? Without the notion of 'poles', why wouldn't we all have nearly identical weather (varying by elevation). Theory is that all the suns rays are 'parallel' and hit all of flat Earth at the same rate (very little variation because sun is so far away.) Antarctica elevation varies bet 2000 and 4500k meters (roughly). Ice and snow covered, with permanent snowcap. Appalachian mountains around 6000k meters. No permanent snowcap, melts every year. That would fall in line with a globe theory. With flat Earth, seems like the valleys would be the permanent cold spots.
No, you're taking it that way. I don't jump to such conclusions. I'm talking about why there aren't videos of Antarctica, why the images suck, and why this image in particular has a strange spot in the forensic tool. So you have no comment on the topic at hand? Why don't you just give your thoughts on Antarctica videos/photos, if your mind permits you to do so, rather than just distract you with some other topic.
You specifically said, “Not like your typical flat earther who lacks an objective mind and simply finds the idea of a flat earth scintillating. I’ve since been searching for proofs either way. Please keep in my that I’m already fully aware of globe theory, and have a 1st class honours degree in aeronautical engineering. I supposed that one of the best proofs would be video footage of Antartica from space.”
I replied directly to your point and gave you the proof for which you are looking and you replied with telling me it has nothing to do with the topic at hand.
What’s with these posts lately? I just made this comment on another claim last night.
“I do long exposure astrophotography.
If you take a long exposure photo of the night sky from the north pole the observer sees the stars appear to rotate as circular light streaks around a point directly overhead, where the Earth's rotational axis intersects the sky at the north celestial pole.
An observer located at a mid northern latitude (say 30°) sees the north celestial pole elevated 30° above his northern horizon.
Care to guess what an observer at the equator sees?
Do you know why we see these differences?
We are on a rotating globe”
Upvote for common sense.
Because under a geocentric model, we are stationary and the stars rotate above. The heliocentric model says that our 23.4 degrees of tilt is angled towards Polaris, thus it appears to be stationary with all stars rotating around it.
90 degrees - 23.4 degrees = ...
Yep, math really is racist AND satanic
The controllers' fake model math embodies 666 everywhere.
Globe earthers read this and go ‘just a coincidence’, because their entire metaphysics is ‘coincidence’. They believe that life began by coincidence. They believe that their consciousness is a coincidence. 66.6 implies meaning. They deny all meaning. It’s nilhilism.
You just said in another comment this isnt about flat earth. You are shilly as fuck
I'm not sure why you're mentioning that at all. Nothing to do with the topic at hand. We're talking about Antarctica. Do you have any comments on the image or Antarctica in general?
You’re not sure at all? Are you kidding? Your entire comment I replied to is about this photo being evidence the earth may be flat.
The earth is flat. Research it before spouting off thinking you’re smart for knowing what we all knew. They lied about everything. Wake up.
ROFLMAO
Why are there cold and hot spots on a flat Earth? Without the notion of 'poles', why wouldn't we all have nearly identical weather (varying by elevation). Theory is that all the suns rays are 'parallel' and hit all of flat Earth at the same rate (very little variation because sun is so far away.) Antarctica elevation varies bet 2000 and 4500k meters (roughly). Ice and snow covered, with permanent snowcap. Appalachian mountains around 6000k meters. No permanent snowcap, melts every year. That would fall in line with a globe theory. With flat Earth, seems like the valleys would be the permanent cold spots.
Link me to the barely watched, years old YT vids you bookmarked… any Planet X vid? I’ll take those as well. 🙄
No, you're taking it that way. I don't jump to such conclusions. I'm talking about why there aren't videos of Antarctica, why the images suck, and why this image in particular has a strange spot in the forensic tool. So you have no comment on the topic at hand? Why don't you just give your thoughts on Antarctica videos/photos, if your mind permits you to do so, rather than just distract you with some other topic.
I’m taking it that way?
You specifically said, “Not like your typical flat earther who lacks an objective mind and simply finds the idea of a flat earth scintillating. I’ve since been searching for proofs either way. Please keep in my that I’m already fully aware of globe theory, and have a 1st class honours degree in aeronautical engineering. I supposed that one of the best proofs would be video footage of Antartica from space.”
I replied directly to your point and gave you the proof for which you are looking and you replied with telling me it has nothing to do with the topic at hand.