So is the AP guilty of a felony for having the phony results posted of the MI primary?
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (22)
sorted by:
Strange how the numbers came up . Media darlings
I think the idea that they were testing the system is a totally fair idea though. They do have to test the systems.
But testing in production? wow.
That means, they have no pre-prod/staging/test env, can't figure out routing, can't mirror nor replicate data, have poor automation, and are generally a bunch of IT hacks that will fight you one every step of the way to improve the environment. Prove me wrong.
I mean, Nov 2020 was also a test to see how far they could cheat.
So far (SO FAR) they've succeeded.
I hope real results will be same. That would be some upset..
I smell....
BULLSHIT!!!!
Ahh yes, I smell shat too.
Someone should make note of these numbers and compare on election night.
They’ll just claim stupidity and hope no one looks into the matter.
Too late. We noticed.
Oh, and the world is watching and knows we noticed.
Not only that, but God knows. He is Allknowing.
As a programmer I think this is a stretch... systems to have to be tested, they won't just magically work together. AP does report election numbers, so they will test integration with these platforms, that's just natural. I am sure the elections are still stolen, I just don't think this is a smoking gun in particular.
and then post the exact same results tuesday
Didn't we just go through this last month or so? Primary results before the primary. Was it Georgia? Same excuse given then? Doesn't anyone own pitchforks anymore, or do they clash with your poodle skirts?
It will be funny if the results end up matching what was released in their so called test. ;o)
Just don’t confuse guilty with arrested, charged or sentenced. Also yes.
7+ hours to figure out who to blame lmao
Hope someone archived the polling data and screenshotted it.
They will claim it is an interesting coincidence, move along....