John Rich on 2nd Amendment limitations—
HERE’S YOU’RE ANSWER 👍👍🇺🇸
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (18)
sorted by:
I'll stick with,
None of your frickin business,
"Shall not be infringed"
is with out limit, or restriction...
Oath breaker,
Amendment hater,
Gun taker,
American faker,
Fucking Rino Rat Commie...
What a list!
Did I miss anybody ?
Let me known
There's room to grow...
Sure I'll think of some:
-Fear addict
-MOLON LABE
-FAFO
-A rifle behind every blade of grass
In all honestly, you don't need an answer.
Double tap just to make sure 😎
Here's your sign: SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
I no longer care what a politician thinks I need. I didn't really before, but the past 6 years have solidified in my mind they have no business deciding.
Yikes. Now imagine there is more than one and the police are waiting outside while everything "cools down".
They can bag off. Thou shalt not infringe fools
Shall not be infringed.
I need as many rounds as I am willing to carry.
Law abiding citizens who can pass a basic background check equal to the rigor needed to serve as infantry should have no small arms restrictions whatsoever.
Don't infringe on my count, I need at least 30
Any "regulation" (modern usage) is infringement. There is no purpose-related qualification, talk of militia and personal defense aside. It's like buying a typewriter. (Hitler killed more people from writing "Mein Kampf" than by anything he did with a weapon.)
What limitations?
1 ▼ – SoMuchWinning45 10 hours ago +1 / -0 What limitations?
How many rounds are allowed in the magazine. Is it an Assault rifle. Each step we comply with is another towards all guns being banned.
Limitations are unconstitutional.