Nobody has ever proven that viruses exist. You can sift through my recent past comments for all the details if you're interested. Most don't want to entertain the possibility because they've been brainwashed their whole lives to believe otherwise. I get it. I too was once this way...and then I decided to research it.
"Covid" is a big mixture of things....unicorn viruses not being one of them. False test results, run-of-the-mill colds and flus, fear-generated illness (hypochondria), releasing of repressed traumas, vaccine poisonings as well as general cabal-induced sickness due to masks, lockdowns, lack of human interaction/touch, etc.
And yeah, I get it. The cabal "one bug" model is a lot easier to understand. Unfortunately, it's all a lie. From rabies to HIV to Covid - it's nothing but a string of expertly crafted lies to keep their slaves in a state of perpetual fear. From Louis Pasteur to Anthony Fauci, and everybody in between - liars (or massively brainwashed "experts") the whole lot of 'em.
Liberate the dogs from their insane vets!! And there is no such VIRUS. We have exactly the same amount of documented scientific evidence of Leprechauns as we do of the rabies virus --- ZILCH.
The ILLNESS that was diagnosed long before Pasteur the madman came around was called "Hydrophobia" (fear of water) as a tiny handful of patients who had suffered a vicious dog or wild animal attack were literally afraid to drink fluids a few days/weeks/months/years after the event. Quite perplexing to say the least.
I've studied about 5 documented cases of hydrophobia from the literature pre-dating 1870 (when Pasteur arrived on the scene). I've also researched all the rabies trials during Pasteur's era (where he fudged the numbers constantly). Surprise, surprise, the "establishment" rejected, suppressed and ignored the many dozens of doctors who thought the rabies jab was not only worthless, but quite often HARMFUL and sometimes DEADLY to the recipient. Kinda like now, eh?
One interesting example is that several of the doctors at that time did research into dog catchers (which was a thing back in the day 1900-1930) and found that these dog catchers had been bitten thousands of times by "rabid" dogs, but none ever "got rabies", nor took any shots. Hard to explain that away, eh?
Regarding the 5 older cases. The most fascinating is two boys who were viciously attacked and received multipole bits by the same dog at the same time in France around 1850. The first boy died of "hydrophobia" about two weeks later, but the second boy had shipped out to America a few days after the incident and lived there for twenty years before finally returning to France. When he arrived in France, he eventually learned of the fate of his friend which he had not heard while in America. A week after hearing of his friends untimely death, he too succumbed to hydrophobia. I wish there were more details, but very interesting nonetheless, eh?
Another case was of a man who died of hydrophobia some 30 years after he was attacked by a wolf. He was effectively a psychological basket case for about a two week period, unwilling to drink water, unable to open his mouth, refusing food/fluids and regularly and irrationally mumbling about the 30-year old wolf attack. The doctors could do nothing for him as he withered away.
I believe this ailment, called "hydrophobia" originally was a much more accurate assessment than the fake virus theory, as it is a psychological one. Being attacked by a wild animal or dog is incredibly traumatic and I can think of few other events in life that would be more traumatic. It happens over the course of several minutes often, and it must be incredibly frightening to endure.
I believe (can't prove) that what is going on psychologically is of a most primal nature. And that is, the human is effectively unable to defend himself while under attack. In short, the human is unable to "bite back", at the most primal level. We lack the equipment/behavior to defend against the attack and this causes a deep psychological shock.
As you may know, our psyche protects us when we are involved in a highly traumatic event, effectively burying the memory until it feels we are finally able to process it fully. This is extremely common with children that are victims of sexual abuse and also with veterans of war that were involved in extremely violent combat. Memory suppression is a powerful defense mechanism.
Now, what every few know is that the resolution of a trauma/conflict involves "re-living the event" in order to finally process and release the memory. It's part of the healing stage of any disease. Having to psychologically re-live the dog/animal attack would be incredibly intense, especially after years or decades. My guess would be it's much more difficult as more time passes, and easier for those who can resolve it within a few days/weeks of the attack.
So this part is 100% my own theory now as I have not seen anybody else speculate on what "rabies" might really be about. I believe that the strange behavior around not wanting to drink, not wanting to eat, etc. is a temporary PARALYSIS of the mouth/larynx/throat region, in effect replaying the attack while being unable to "bite back" and defend oneself. It's like our primal "bite reflex" has been lost in evolution although our old reptilian brain still wants to activate in order to defend. Crazy, eh? That's the best working theory I have at the moment based on all the published literature I can find.
The modern scientific literature on rabies is scant and low on detail. Virtually 99% of the population around the world gets a rabies shot after a dog attack nowadays. And just like in the past, a tiny percentage succumb regardless.
Lastly, it's worth noting that there were roughly 50 cases of hydrophobia deaths per year reported in France, Germany (Prussia) and England in the decades preceding the emergence of Pasteur. After he drummed up his poison jab, the numbers skyrocketed to between 2500 and 5000 deaths per year. If nothing else, this should be all you really need to know to reconsider things.
The actual "rabid dog" is a simple explanation by comparison. These dogs are suffering from one of three things (or multiple) - starvation, abusive treatment and/or poisoning. This is painfully obvious to anybody who cares to look at the evidence with an open mind. The fact that the human population is brainwashed into rushing their kids to the hospital for a highly gruesome and painful round of rabies shots every time Fido the family dog nips one of them matches up quite perfectly with the insanity we are seeing today with the ConVid jab. It's the height of absurdity!!!
And I can guarantee that some of these kids who get the multiple rounds on rabies jabs suffer some serious trauma along the way. This is also my working theory around autism. The anti-vax crowd presses on with their theory of neurotoxins being the culprit. While I can't discount this as a possibility, it just doesn't make sense scientifically. If a bunch of kids in the same neighborhood or that see the same pediatrician all suddenly got autism after their routine MMR jab, then the neurotoxin theory would make some sense. But this never happens. It's always completely RANDOM. One kid gets the MMR in Detroit, another kid gets the DPT in New York at a different time, another kid takes the HPV in LA at a different time etc. Different places, different times, different jabs, different ages, etc. While at the same time, it's simple to demonstrate that other kids in those localities took the same jab, from the same "batch" around the same time, but didn't become autistic.
My working theory on the autism scourge is that some of these kids suffer an anger/fear/betrayal trauma DURING THE JAB EVENT itself. These are kids that have suffered some other type of conflict prior to, and it is this second trauma event they are unable to understand/process (why is my mother, my protector letting them do these horrible things to me?) which leads their psyche to bury the memory by suppressing a region of the brain that assists with what we would call "normal functioning". If you've ever watched a very young child heavily scream and suffer through a round of jabs, you'd know what I mean. It's horrific to watch.
Anyway - believe it or not, I could say a lot more but that should suffice for now. You can view my many other comments the past week or so regarding how we now definitively know that nobody has even demonstrated the existence of a virus in any rational and realistic way.
What do you think? Crazy? Impossible? Possible? Probable?
And you should read this VIROLIEGY post specifically about some of Kirsch's earlier claims (and most anything else on the site for that matter), as well as the many posts by u/Morpheus11 on the topic.
I find those like Kirsch who are valuable to us for all their criticisms of the vaccine while insisting on the existence of viruses to be serving in the role of limited hangouts. They reveal some truths to those who are already persuaded to believe them anyway, all the while never ranging far and wide enough to bring more fundamental and insidious aspects under the light. The circular and unscientific nature of virology is never considered, nor is its blatant misuse of language to obscure or change meaning (e.g., "isolation").
The limited hangouts give vaccine skeptics lots to chew on while keeping their gaze from ever coming to rest on the more central question of virus existence. That's because unquestioning belief in an invisible entity on which essentially anything can be blamed, and on which people have to trust the experts is more valuable than believing in the effectiveness of vaccines. The concept of a virus is the supreme weapon in the arsenal of those who thrive on deception, and must be defended at all costs.
Yeah, I read it many days ago. And wrote a whole bunch about it here in a thread a few days ago.
Steve is a double-jabbed, lifelong liberal who's donated millions to the likes of Hillary and Obama over the years. He still believes in "experts/authorities" and has demonstrated that he isn't interested in any other perspectives.
I support his anti-jab efforts, but he's lost in the logical "appeal to authority" fallacy when it comes to leprechaun viruses.
Net-Net - he's still 98% brainwashed. He's only recently realized that ALL VAXES aren't proven "safe & effective", but he still advocates for them nonetheless.
Steve's gotta lot to learn. You can sift through my comments from a few days ago for a full breakdown on everything Steve and his trained virology buddies choose to ignore.
Interesting. I'm at a point where I'm not too sure what to believe in -- anything seems possible at the moment.
Though, common sense tells me that viruses like the flu virus exists. When my wife gets sick, then everyone else in the family catches it.
One might argue that it's a parasite as opposed to a virus, but one thing for sure is that there exists a contagious entity that can cause the human body to become sick and ill.
Yep, this is the big stumbling block for almost everybody. I totally understand.
The very dissatisfying and highly disappointing rebuttal to this is that it is worry-concern-fear that leads to this situation. There's a reason most first year medical students are hypochondriacs. The same phenomenon is at work when we think somebody near to us is "contagious".
I go much further and suggest that all disease arises from a variety of different life situations that catch us off guard in which we cannot quickly resolve. Our psyche responds by making various adjustments to our tissues, organs, bones etc. to help us deal with the conflict and ultimately resolve it.
Doesn't "it stink" when your wife or kids come home with the flu? Think that through and see if you can connect the dots...if you'd like. If you don't, then don't. But keep that open-mind. It will go a long way in the times ahead.
You can read some of my prior comments here on the board for my much longer explanations as to how and why nobody has ever demonstrated the existence of a theoretical virus.
What I find most surprising here on GA is that so few realize the propagandists, or "disinfo agents", are ACTIVELY creating material for the rapidly growing population of "conspiracy theorists" out there. The mainstream propaganda is ready made, following decades of indoctrination and brainwashing for all of us. They're having to gin up a lot of new stuff to keep the growing conspiracy crowd confused.
Are there biolabs in Ukraine? Of course there are. But I'd suggest they aren't doing any "gain of function virus reserach" at all. What they're involved in is far more sinister.
I believe viruses (and bacteria) are real…but I am questioning germ theory (theory that bacteria, fungi, parasites, viruses) are responsible solely for disease, as opposed to the terrain theory, which states that something is going on in the body (inflammation, mildly sub-optimal health, vitamin and micronutrient deficiencies) which then allow disease agents (from above groups, including viruses) to get a foothold in a persons body to then create illness. Interesting to see the different people who put forth those competing ideas…and who had the backing of the elite to win the day…I seem to remember some deathbed confession about germ theory wrong…or something. Interesting stuff.
I think Kirsch is more than confused. I think his mission is to keep folks from questioning the existence of viruses at all costs. He gives us dirt on the vaxx at no cost, because we already think it's deadly, but he always guards the temple of the virus.
He's smart, knows how to do research, and is not vested (as far as we know) in the idea of a virus. And yet he pulls out all stops to engage in full on sophistry and outright denial whenever the precious virus is threatened. And it is extremely precious to those who want to control us.
Great analysis (and thanks for the previous shoutout).
Don't forget that Kirsch runs the "Vaccine Safety Research Foundation (VSRF)" as his philanthropic passion to help humankind. I don't know how many people he employs, nor how long he's been running his foundation. But what I do know with certainty is that if there were no such thing as viruses, there would be no need for the VSRF any longer either.
Suffice it to say, he's got a little more than just a vested interest in keeping the virus story alive.
I've requested a phone call with him 3 times now. He keeps asking for someone to explain how he got covid from his wife, if not a virus. It's too complicated an explanation to do in writing, and possibly too unbelievable to process even after thoroughly explained. Nonetheless, I keep pushing him.
He has engaged in some back and forth banter with me, but as soon as I say; "hey Steve, let's have a quick chat/zoom to clarify some things", he goes quiet on me.
Net-Net - His sincerity appears to be highly dubious in my estimation, as you rightly point out as well.
Great! We're greatly outnumbered here. There are those who have sincerely researched the subject, and those that haven't. Your comment above is spot on. Pure 'ganda.
I feel the need to write a fresh thread reminding us Q folk that the cabal is actively generating mass quantities of 'ganda for our consumption on an hourly basis. It seems this notion is being overlooked by far too many.
It's gonna be a rough "told ya so". Hopefully dropping comments here from time to time will ease the shock a bit, as opposed to those that never even considered the possibility.
Thanks for researching and informing yourself rather than believing all the lies and keep up the red pillin' Pyro!
Nobody has ever proven that viruses exist. You can sift through my recent past comments for all the details if you're interested. Most don't want to entertain the possibility because they've been brainwashed their whole lives to believe otherwise. I get it. I too was once this way...and then I decided to research it.
"Covid" is a big mixture of things....unicorn viruses not being one of them. False test results, run-of-the-mill colds and flus, fear-generated illness (hypochondria), releasing of repressed traumas, vaccine poisonings as well as general cabal-induced sickness due to masks, lockdowns, lack of human interaction/touch, etc.
And yeah, I get it. The cabal "one bug" model is a lot easier to understand. Unfortunately, it's all a lie. From rabies to HIV to Covid - it's nothing but a string of expertly crafted lies to keep their slaves in a state of perpetual fear. From Louis Pasteur to Anthony Fauci, and everybody in between - liars (or massively brainwashed "experts") the whole lot of 'em.
Rabies?
Leprechauns?
Didn't see leprechauns mentioned in your comment.
But, rabies?
Dogs are going to be so stoked to find out there's no such illness LOL
Liberate the dogs from their insane vets!! And there is no such VIRUS. We have exactly the same amount of documented scientific evidence of Leprechauns as we do of the rabies virus --- ZILCH.
The ILLNESS that was diagnosed long before Pasteur the madman came around was called "Hydrophobia" (fear of water) as a tiny handful of patients who had suffered a vicious dog or wild animal attack were literally afraid to drink fluids a few days/weeks/months/years after the event. Quite perplexing to say the least.
I've studied about 5 documented cases of hydrophobia from the literature pre-dating 1870 (when Pasteur arrived on the scene). I've also researched all the rabies trials during Pasteur's era (where he fudged the numbers constantly). Surprise, surprise, the "establishment" rejected, suppressed and ignored the many dozens of doctors who thought the rabies jab was not only worthless, but quite often HARMFUL and sometimes DEADLY to the recipient. Kinda like now, eh?
One interesting example is that several of the doctors at that time did research into dog catchers (which was a thing back in the day 1900-1930) and found that these dog catchers had been bitten thousands of times by "rabid" dogs, but none ever "got rabies", nor took any shots. Hard to explain that away, eh?
Regarding the 5 older cases. The most fascinating is two boys who were viciously attacked and received multipole bits by the same dog at the same time in France around 1850. The first boy died of "hydrophobia" about two weeks later, but the second boy had shipped out to America a few days after the incident and lived there for twenty years before finally returning to France. When he arrived in France, he eventually learned of the fate of his friend which he had not heard while in America. A week after hearing of his friends untimely death, he too succumbed to hydrophobia. I wish there were more details, but very interesting nonetheless, eh?
Another case was of a man who died of hydrophobia some 30 years after he was attacked by a wolf. He was effectively a psychological basket case for about a two week period, unwilling to drink water, unable to open his mouth, refusing food/fluids and regularly and irrationally mumbling about the 30-year old wolf attack. The doctors could do nothing for him as he withered away.
I believe this ailment, called "hydrophobia" originally was a much more accurate assessment than the fake virus theory, as it is a psychological one. Being attacked by a wild animal or dog is incredibly traumatic and I can think of few other events in life that would be more traumatic. It happens over the course of several minutes often, and it must be incredibly frightening to endure.
I believe (can't prove) that what is going on psychologically is of a most primal nature. And that is, the human is effectively unable to defend himself while under attack. In short, the human is unable to "bite back", at the most primal level. We lack the equipment/behavior to defend against the attack and this causes a deep psychological shock.
As you may know, our psyche protects us when we are involved in a highly traumatic event, effectively burying the memory until it feels we are finally able to process it fully. This is extremely common with children that are victims of sexual abuse and also with veterans of war that were involved in extremely violent combat. Memory suppression is a powerful defense mechanism.
Now, what every few know is that the resolution of a trauma/conflict involves "re-living the event" in order to finally process and release the memory. It's part of the healing stage of any disease. Having to psychologically re-live the dog/animal attack would be incredibly intense, especially after years or decades. My guess would be it's much more difficult as more time passes, and easier for those who can resolve it within a few days/weeks of the attack.
So this part is 100% my own theory now as I have not seen anybody else speculate on what "rabies" might really be about. I believe that the strange behavior around not wanting to drink, not wanting to eat, etc. is a temporary PARALYSIS of the mouth/larynx/throat region, in effect replaying the attack while being unable to "bite back" and defend oneself. It's like our primal "bite reflex" has been lost in evolution although our old reptilian brain still wants to activate in order to defend. Crazy, eh? That's the best working theory I have at the moment based on all the published literature I can find.
The modern scientific literature on rabies is scant and low on detail. Virtually 99% of the population around the world gets a rabies shot after a dog attack nowadays. And just like in the past, a tiny percentage succumb regardless.
Lastly, it's worth noting that there were roughly 50 cases of hydrophobia deaths per year reported in France, Germany (Prussia) and England in the decades preceding the emergence of Pasteur. After he drummed up his poison jab, the numbers skyrocketed to between 2500 and 5000 deaths per year. If nothing else, this should be all you really need to know to reconsider things.
The actual "rabid dog" is a simple explanation by comparison. These dogs are suffering from one of three things (or multiple) - starvation, abusive treatment and/or poisoning. This is painfully obvious to anybody who cares to look at the evidence with an open mind. The fact that the human population is brainwashed into rushing their kids to the hospital for a highly gruesome and painful round of rabies shots every time Fido the family dog nips one of them matches up quite perfectly with the insanity we are seeing today with the ConVid jab. It's the height of absurdity!!!
And I can guarantee that some of these kids who get the multiple rounds on rabies jabs suffer some serious trauma along the way. This is also my working theory around autism. The anti-vax crowd presses on with their theory of neurotoxins being the culprit. While I can't discount this as a possibility, it just doesn't make sense scientifically. If a bunch of kids in the same neighborhood or that see the same pediatrician all suddenly got autism after their routine MMR jab, then the neurotoxin theory would make some sense. But this never happens. It's always completely RANDOM. One kid gets the MMR in Detroit, another kid gets the DPT in New York at a different time, another kid takes the HPV in LA at a different time etc. Different places, different times, different jabs, different ages, etc. While at the same time, it's simple to demonstrate that other kids in those localities took the same jab, from the same "batch" around the same time, but didn't become autistic.
My working theory on the autism scourge is that some of these kids suffer an anger/fear/betrayal trauma DURING THE JAB EVENT itself. These are kids that have suffered some other type of conflict prior to, and it is this second trauma event they are unable to understand/process (why is my mother, my protector letting them do these horrible things to me?) which leads their psyche to bury the memory by suppressing a region of the brain that assists with what we would call "normal functioning". If you've ever watched a very young child heavily scream and suffer through a round of jabs, you'd know what I mean. It's horrific to watch.
Anyway - believe it or not, I could say a lot more but that should suffice for now. You can view my many other comments the past week or so regarding how we now definitively know that nobody has even demonstrated the existence of a virus in any rational and realistic way.
What do you think? Crazy? Impossible? Possible? Probable?
You should read this
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/if-viruses-dont-exist-then-how-can
And you should read this VIROLIEGY post specifically about some of Kirsch's earlier claims (and most anything else on the site for that matter), as well as the many posts by u/Morpheus11 on the topic.
I find those like Kirsch who are valuable to us for all their criticisms of the vaccine while insisting on the existence of viruses to be serving in the role of limited hangouts. They reveal some truths to those who are already persuaded to believe them anyway, all the while never ranging far and wide enough to bring more fundamental and insidious aspects under the light. The circular and unscientific nature of virology is never considered, nor is its blatant misuse of language to obscure or change meaning (e.g., "isolation").
The limited hangouts give vaccine skeptics lots to chew on while keeping their gaze from ever coming to rest on the more central question of virus existence. That's because unquestioning belief in an invisible entity on which essentially anything can be blamed, and on which people have to trust the experts is more valuable than believing in the effectiveness of vaccines. The concept of a virus is the supreme weapon in the arsenal of those who thrive on deception, and must be defended at all costs.
Yeah, I read it many days ago. And wrote a whole bunch about it here in a thread a few days ago.
Steve is a double-jabbed, lifelong liberal who's donated millions to the likes of Hillary and Obama over the years. He still believes in "experts/authorities" and has demonstrated that he isn't interested in any other perspectives.
I support his anti-jab efforts, but he's lost in the logical "appeal to authority" fallacy when it comes to leprechaun viruses.
Net-Net - he's still 98% brainwashed. He's only recently realized that ALL VAXES aren't proven "safe & effective", but he still advocates for them nonetheless.
Steve's gotta lot to learn. You can sift through my comments from a few days ago for a full breakdown on everything Steve and his trained virology buddies choose to ignore.
Interesting. I'm at a point where I'm not too sure what to believe in -- anything seems possible at the moment.
Though, common sense tells me that viruses like the flu virus exists. When my wife gets sick, then everyone else in the family catches it.
One might argue that it's a parasite as opposed to a virus, but one thing for sure is that there exists a contagious entity that can cause the human body to become sick and ill.
Yep, this is the big stumbling block for almost everybody. I totally understand.
The very dissatisfying and highly disappointing rebuttal to this is that it is worry-concern-fear that leads to this situation. There's a reason most first year medical students are hypochondriacs. The same phenomenon is at work when we think somebody near to us is "contagious".
I go much further and suggest that all disease arises from a variety of different life situations that catch us off guard in which we cannot quickly resolve. Our psyche responds by making various adjustments to our tissues, organs, bones etc. to help us deal with the conflict and ultimately resolve it.
Doesn't "it stink" when your wife or kids come home with the flu? Think that through and see if you can connect the dots...if you'd like. If you don't, then don't. But keep that open-mind. It will go a long way in the times ahead.
You can read some of my prior comments here on the board for my much longer explanations as to how and why nobody has ever demonstrated the existence of a theoretical virus.
What I find most surprising here on GA is that so few realize the propagandists, or "disinfo agents", are ACTIVELY creating material for the rapidly growing population of "conspiracy theorists" out there. The mainstream propaganda is ready made, following decades of indoctrination and brainwashing for all of us. They're having to gin up a lot of new stuff to keep the growing conspiracy crowd confused.
Are there biolabs in Ukraine? Of course there are. But I'd suggest they aren't doing any "gain of function virus reserach" at all. What they're involved in is far more sinister.
I believe viruses (and bacteria) are real…but I am questioning germ theory (theory that bacteria, fungi, parasites, viruses) are responsible solely for disease, as opposed to the terrain theory, which states that something is going on in the body (inflammation, mildly sub-optimal health, vitamin and micronutrient deficiencies) which then allow disease agents (from above groups, including viruses) to get a foothold in a persons body to then create illness. Interesting to see the different people who put forth those competing ideas…and who had the backing of the elite to win the day…I seem to remember some deathbed confession about germ theory wrong…or something. Interesting stuff.
I think Kirsch is more than confused. I think his mission is to keep folks from questioning the existence of viruses at all costs. He gives us dirt on the vaxx at no cost, because we already think it's deadly, but he always guards the temple of the virus.
He's smart, knows how to do research, and is not vested (as far as we know) in the idea of a virus. And yet he pulls out all stops to engage in full on sophistry and outright denial whenever the precious virus is threatened. And it is extremely precious to those who want to control us.
Great analysis (and thanks for the previous shoutout).
Don't forget that Kirsch runs the "Vaccine Safety Research Foundation (VSRF)" as his philanthropic passion to help humankind. I don't know how many people he employs, nor how long he's been running his foundation. But what I do know with certainty is that if there were no such thing as viruses, there would be no need for the VSRF any longer either.
Suffice it to say, he's got a little more than just a vested interest in keeping the virus story alive.
I've requested a phone call with him 3 times now. He keeps asking for someone to explain how he got covid from his wife, if not a virus. It's too complicated an explanation to do in writing, and possibly too unbelievable to process even after thoroughly explained. Nonetheless, I keep pushing him.
He has engaged in some back and forth banter with me, but as soon as I say; "hey Steve, let's have a quick chat/zoom to clarify some things", he goes quiet on me.
Net-Net - His sincerity appears to be highly dubious in my estimation, as you rightly point out as well.
We shall see...
I am with you. Whatever virus I got last November was no joke.
You'd be the first to demonstrate they do if so!
Apparently even us Q folk aren't ready for this, yet.
I agree... C19 doesn't exist. It's all one giant Propaganda Campaign. (see my comment above).
Oh well... can't wait for that "I told ya so". That will be rough...
Great! We're greatly outnumbered here. There are those who have sincerely researched the subject, and those that haven't. Your comment above is spot on. Pure 'ganda.
I feel the need to write a fresh thread reminding us Q folk that the cabal is actively generating mass quantities of 'ganda for our consumption on an hourly basis. It seems this notion is being overlooked by far too many.
It's gonna be a rough "told ya so". Hopefully dropping comments here from time to time will ease the shock a bit, as opposed to those that never even considered the possibility.
Thanks for researching and informing yourself rather than believing all the lies and keep up the red pillin' Pyro!