I think we are on opposite sides of the same coin. My view is that Trump said "fishing expedition" on purpose because it makes a Delta for us. He could have called it the "witch hunt" or any other term he found fit to use, but because of the Delta he chose to use fishing expedition. Had this been released tomorrow, I would guess he wouldn't have used that term. Just my thought, right or wrong I don't know.
I think DRan's point is that With the Q board in place, DJT can take many and any opportunities that arise to shoot out a Q confirmation. Just as he can draw an airQ and any given moment.
Trump has ultimate choice over making his statement. The question is, is he perhaps taking the opportunity and using it in a way that resonates with a Q delta.
That’s kind of the point I was making. Perhaps “delta” wasn’t the best term to use. The way I see it, Trump fit in the word fishing into this because he knew we would look at drops from this date. It’s not confirming anything other than Trump is aware of the Q drops. We know he knows, but in my mind this just kind of shows it to us.
Yes, but the strength of a delta is if it predicts the future.
Not at all. Not at all.
Future proves past. This does not mean that Q is predicting dates. It means that when things unfold, they will prove the validity and relevance of Q's board drops.
Personally, I'm not a big fan of the approach to Q drops as if they are foreshadowing every little event in the future.
Things like 11.3 are different. These are pre-established dates. But I think that most of what Q was dropping in the close to 5000 drops are events, issues and matters that were current at the time, because the primary purpose was to activate anons, build a movement of people awake and aware of what was happening, and from that place, just expand.
To interpret and analyse and see beyond the surface, we don't need Q anymore. As a whole, we've progressed forward, based on what we've learned and the skills, attitude and approaches we've learned.
Plus, the overall Plan is out there.
Regarding dates, etc, Q clarified how the Plan works, when they referenced the 'countdown' cycles used when launching a rocket to the moon, for example.
There are points and thresholds that have to be reached for the countdown to continue, when certain issues or requirements can pause it.
Same indicated by the red lines. These indicate threshold points, or trigger points resulting in certain movements, rather than a predictive, flat line rigid timetable.
A delta is simply a change in value, in our case time. Δt = t₂ - t₁. It is just how many seconds, minutes, hours, days, weeks, years of difference there is between 2 things, like a Q post and a happening.
I think we are on opposite sides of the same coin. My view is that Trump said "fishing expedition" on purpose because it makes a Delta for us. He could have called it the "witch hunt" or any other term he found fit to use, but because of the Delta he chose to use fishing expedition. Had this been released tomorrow, I would guess he wouldn't have used that term. Just my thought, right or wrong I don't know.
But wasn't this all driven by the DOJ and the date they chose to raid Mar-a-lago?
Trump didn't have any choice over the date to make his statement.
Unless he is in complete control !
Bingo.
Maybe Trump just choose the best Q word to use according to the day
I think DRan's point is that With the Q board in place, DJT can take many and any opportunities that arise to shoot out a Q confirmation. Just as he can draw an airQ and any given moment.
Trump has ultimate choice over making his statement. The question is, is he perhaps taking the opportunity and using it in a way that resonates with a Q delta.
I think Garland said it wasn't authorized by him, so could be "white hat FBI agents" doing a false flag event. Who knows.
Trump is now breaking fundraising records. It's waiting people up and they're pissed.
If this is true then somebody better start building some gallows...
That’s kind of the point I was making. Perhaps “delta” wasn’t the best term to use. The way I see it, Trump fit in the word fishing into this because he knew we would look at drops from this date. It’s not confirming anything other than Trump is aware of the Q drops. We know he knows, but in my mind this just kind of shows it to us.
Not at all. Not at all.
Future proves past. This does not mean that Q is predicting dates. It means that when things unfold, they will prove the validity and relevance of Q's board drops.
Personally, I'm not a big fan of the approach to Q drops as if they are foreshadowing every little event in the future.
Things like 11.3 are different. These are pre-established dates. But I think that most of what Q was dropping in the close to 5000 drops are events, issues and matters that were current at the time, because the primary purpose was to activate anons, build a movement of people awake and aware of what was happening, and from that place, just expand.
To interpret and analyse and see beyond the surface, we don't need Q anymore. As a whole, we've progressed forward, based on what we've learned and the skills, attitude and approaches we've learned.
Plus, the overall Plan is out there.
Regarding dates, etc, Q clarified how the Plan works, when they referenced the 'countdown' cycles used when launching a rocket to the moon, for example.
u/#q2679
There are points and thresholds that have to be reached for the countdown to continue, when certain issues or requirements can pause it.
Same indicated by the red lines. These indicate threshold points, or trigger points resulting in certain movements, rather than a predictive, flat line rigid timetable.
u/#q4414
https://qagg.news/?q=Delta+
A delta is simply a change in value, in our case time.
Δt = t₂ - t₁. It is just how many seconds, minutes, hours, days, weeks, years of difference there is between 2 things, like a Q post and a happening.Here are a few examples of Q using deltas.