Pick your side.
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (31)
sorted by:
Just a notch to the left of anarchy.
I think you are right, that is if we ever had a constitutional republic in the first place. We have been deceived for a very long time. Shame on our country and maybe shame on us for putting elected officials in charge of so much of our lives. The truth of power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely has been shown to be very true.
Why did he write "chose wisely"? That's past tense. Surely he means "choose wisely"? Or is he sending a message with the missing "o"?
Good catch. I'm not certain, but he probably isn't trying to be cryptic and send a "hidden" message. Although I don't know. I agree with you, he probably meant choose wisely, unless he is talking of himself and he chose wisely when he had the choice.
Here’s my total freedom…. You’re making me uncomfortable, The Architect. Not a big fan of black and white thinking, pitting total freedom against total control. And don’t use the Pepe meme.
So you want a gray area of coercion?
Had the same thought.
Been on freedoms side for my whole life
DAMMIT, he was so close, and now my OCD will never forgive that typo.
...
He's right, though.
Freedom is not "Christian-enforced values." That's a dictatorship with a religious dictator.
In the end there are only two churches... 🤔
OMG, I need to be in the Matrix for this..
This is the way.
Does total freedom include allowing minors to go on hormone blockers and/or have surgery to mutilate organs?
Does it mean going along with the idea that adults can prey on minors and/or animals should be left up to be victims of sick evil deviants?
Does total freedom include allowing adults to indoctrinate the minds of the youth by getting them to hate or distrust their parents? To see that adult as their "safe space" rather than that minor wanting to go feel the safety in going to their parent when they are dealing with difficult situations?
Does that total freedom also mean staying silent when a woman has multiple abortions because she refuses to practice safe sex and always knows that she can kill her unborn child instead of taking any kind of responsibility for her actions?
I dont think anyone is after THAT kind of freedom.... in fact, that just makes us slaves to the devil
No, it means total freedom from government coercion, not total freedom from rules protecting other people.
Did you think I used “rules” to avoid using “laws”? Legitimate law enforcement isn’t coercive. You statists are trying to construct a strawman by saying that those of us who want freedom from government coercion really want freedom from laws. Not true. God gave us the law so we could be more free from strife.
What is "legitimate law enforcement?" Modern brown shirts telling you what you may or may not do?
Laws for the last 100+ years have been written specifically to infringe on our rights. I'm not saying you're wrong, but they protect the government, not us.
No one was arguing against legit laws, you super-heterosexual man, you
Good boy
Ok, but if it isnt specified as such by very people fighting for the cause of such, then they can, and will, sway people to fight for full freedom to include freedom of consequences. We must, and should have all along, have people declare EXACTLY what it is they are advocating for, no "in between the lines"/assumption messaging.
Its cool that you have a person IRL relationship with him to know for sure what it IS or IS NOT that he is implying roll eyes Character limits be damned, one can make multiple tweets.
Far too many people, even in this "movement" give strangers online too much blind trust and faith.
Obviously, you care more than you are letting on, but ok....