This sex ed book tells minors to go online to "safely" research their kinks and fantasies. They promote porn to minors calling it a "fun, sugary treat" & to research by watching their "favorite porn performers". This goes way beyond grooming. This is sexual enticement of minors.😡😡😡
(media.greatawakening.win)
🤢 These people are sick! 🤮
Porn is a slippery slope to addiction, dissatisfaction and dehumanisation, as well as extremely harmful to produce.
I don't think it should ever be recommended, least of all to impressionable youngsters.
It ruins lives,
Not all has malicious intent, but there is a LOT of human trafficking in porn.
It's a door that can't be closed now that it's open, but it's definitely sad.
Shouldn't be encouraging kids to look at porn. Should be encouraging them to read a book. Play video games. Go out with friends. Study. Pick up a hobby (that isn't porn). Essentially, anything that is meant for a * K I D *. Sex isn't meant for kids.
Pedophilic bastards.
Post pubescent teens aren't kids. If we want to keep certain age restrictions, fine. But we need massive overhauls on how we view and educate teens.
13 or 14 should be soft starting adulthood. And those that can prove they are responsible adults should be recognized as such. This can happen as early as 15 or 16. But retarding our youth five years was a mistake and our "education" is mostly pollution.
As for human trafficking, absolutely that needs to be dismantled. However as long as men and women desire boobs, there will always be a sex trade. And those who engage in it, it's their business. As long as there is consent, it's no one's place to regulate people's lives no matter how right you think you are.
A 12 and 13 year old is still a kid. This isn't even up for discussion or argument, and there is no actual response you can successfully make against this point so I would avoid trying.
Possibly. But they tried that, and we ended up in a very awful position.
This can be a slippery slope. Additionally, this is not relevant to schooling. This is something up for parents to decide. If you want to make a commentary on parenting and how they should be gradually increasing freedom and responsibility, I'm right there with you. But schools do not get to make this dictation to the kids over their parents.
True, repression has consequences but this would probably be a "meet in the middle" argument which neither side is willing to do at the present juncture, as they are too far apart now.
We are in agreement (sort of) but getting kids addicted to porn has a lot of far reaching developmental problems, both physically and socially. Thus, advocating porn directly to children in the primes of their youth is nothing short of destructive degeneracy.
Even a video game can improve physical and mental reflex, hand-eye coordination and increase the speed of problem solving.
There is nothing beneficial to porn except the dopamine hit, so while I don't think it should be stigmatized like our side tends to do, I do absolutely NOT ever agree with providing this sort of material to very young youth.
Hey no one is forcing anyone to be here...
That's a pretty weird thing to occur.
I watch a few very wholesome channels focused on various things, and they get a lot of praise for how wholesome they are.
You always gotta take the good with the bad and vice versa. There will always be jerks, but there are also good ones too.
The only two white characters on the cover are fat.
Or paralyzed in a wheelchair.
I saw that immediately too.
And one is portrayed as dorky/non athletic and the other as trans/gay.
And one emphasizes the black man x fat white woman dynamic.
Nogs take the fat whitey because nobody else will and they're less of a headache than their own.
Sugar is a pretty decent analogy for porn actually. Both addictive. One slowly kills your body and the other fries your brain.
Until you become aware of the illusion then it starts to subside.
All we need is education on the subject. It's fantasy no different than other fantasy. It's not intimacy, it's indulgence.
It can effect your brian, but no more than drinking a soda will give you diabetes...
Yes, it's important to educate people on the dangers and risks of porn. However, we must also be careful not to exaggerate them either and shaming people will just make them want to indulge harder.
People have the right to choose for themselves and that right needs to be respected.
I never said anybody didn't have the right to choose if they watch it. Or shame anyone. Or exagerate it. I said the analogy is decent.
Like you said, 1 soda doesn't give you diabetes just like 1 porno doesn't rot your brain, but both are addictive and destructive in excess.
“ So anyways —I started blastin’ …”
What is the author's name?
Authors are Erika Moen and Matthew Nolan.
The images on this post are the left's "new normal." Everyone's obese or chubby, mostly non-white, and it's hard to tell what gender they are. That's the way they want everyone to look and everyone to live. And, of course, they throw in the disabled person for "inclusivity" because people in wheelchairs can be deranged perverts, too, you know.
It will benefit our youth and empower your relationships with your offspring to have an honest discussion about this subject matter. To ban something like this is to give it cause. However, to talk things out and let people decide for themselves is the way forward.