https://conventionofstates.com/
From what I've seen and heard about it, it is trying to create an Article 5 convention of states to impose term limits on federal officials, restrict spending and budgeting by the federal government, and returns power to the states that the federal government stole form them a long time ago.
We are told by Gen Flynn and Q to get LOCALLY INVOLVED! This is a great way to do it. Apparently, all we have to do is sign the petition and say which state we live in, and it gets counted to the state petition for our state. Over 2 million signatures and growing (though i doubt the counter is accurate).
So far, 17 states have signed the petition, but we would need twice that to convene. If any of you haven't found about this yet, please look into it! A lot of people on our side have endorsed it, including DeSantis, Mark Levin, Rand Paul, and James O'Keefe.
This is dangerous, it opens up the constitution to be messed with by the liberals as well. They could hijack the convention and do who knows what with the constitution.
ICYMI... The Constitution is being decimated by liberal and crooked career politicians. The framers knew that one day we may need a way around a corrupt government and they wrote Article 5 which allows a super majority of states to come together and remedy the situation. Term limits, fiscal responsibility and now we also need honest elections. Its not about changing or overhauling anything, its there, its law, its part of the Constitution.
Madison, Hamilton and Washington were strongly opposed to Art 5 Convention of any sort. They did not hide the fact that this clause is a weak point of the Constitution, created as a last minute compromise with the anti-federalists, made to get the draft of the 1787' Constitution finally signed:
• J.Madison in Federalist No.49 (Feb 2nd, 1788) said, a convention is neither proper nor effective to restrain government when it encroaches. "The passions therefore, not the reason of the public, would sit in judgment." (in the event of the Convention).
• J.Madison said in his letter to Turberville (Nov 2nd, 1788), he “trembled” at the prospect of a second convention. If there was an Article 5 convention, then “the most violent partizans” and “individuals of insidious views” would strive to be delegates and would have “a dangerous opportunity of sapping the very foundations of the fabric of our Country".
• A.Hamilton in Federalist No.85 (May 28th,1788; last paragraph) said, he “dreads” the consequences of another convention because the enemies of the Constitution want to get rid of it.
• G.Washington warned Richard Peters in his letter (Sep 7th,1788. last paragraph), about the danger he saw threatening the peace and prosperity that was only recently restored to the people of America (G. Mason's initiative for a new Constitution, Virginia). He perceived a second convention of states as an existential threat to the Republic.
If we had truly free and fair elections would we even think about opening up the Constitution for a massive overhaul? Fixing 2020 will go a lot farther in preventing bad government than risking the Constitution as we know it being rewritten.
They want to add an amendment, not rewrite the consitution. read the link
You’ll definitely want to research this subject deeply before committing to it. Soros has two or three different organizations pushing for COS. The best argument I’ve heard against it is simple - if they see no reason to follow the Constitution as written, what makes you think a COS amendment would be different? We have to overhaul our current government and remove the corruption.
If Soros is pushing it then it's definitely suspect. We need to know the full details including how the agenda is controlled and what SPECIFIC language is being pushed and can that be locked in prior to opening the COS? Bannon covered this yesterday and is for it. But I have reservations because I'm not convinced the current batch of GOP are really America First and will stick to their promises. I do like/support term limits, etc. But that could just be the carrot to get us to fall for a trick.
You don't need to know the specific language of the state applications to determine the outcome of such Convention.
It's the Congress who calls the Convention; states only apply (Art V). In combination with Art I, sec 8, last clause, Congress additionally has exclusive and unlimited legislative powers over the Convention. Those who set the rules determine the outcome.
Language of a state application has no legal power, only thing that matters is whether the state applies for a Convention or not. (scholars). That's why the enemies of the US Constitution simultaneously push Wolf-pac in liberal states and COS, BBA and Term Limits initiatives in the republican states. The goal is 34 state applications in total (Wolf-pac+COS+BBA+Term Limits+...), because that's the point of no return for the US.
They (Pelosi, Schumer) will determine how the state delegates are chosen, how the votes are counted (electoral college?), what issue has priority, will deliberations of the Convention take place behind closed doors, what additional amendments to the Constitution be considered, should convention consider new ratification method of the new constitution (basing on the 1787 precedence), etc... Here is a statement made by constitutionalist Edwin Vieria on the matter.
https://www.heritage.org/about-heritage/mission
You’re right, the people selling the idea make it sound safe. My research tells me it isn’t. And if we have to vote for convention delegates in the same broken process, we have no real control.
Yet again, Congress is the one proposing amendments and not the states? The government needs to be entirely overhauled.
I completely understand your frustration, I think we all feel it. I would like to see the difference a few clean elections would have on our government first. Like I said, if the current election process is used to choose state delegates for the convention the deck is stacked against us. And, a lot people in Congress will end up being delegates anyway.
Neither. It's the Convention who proposes amendments and, since it's the Congress who creates the laws for the purpose of the convention, Congress will determine the outcome of the Convention.
States only apply, therefore they have no guaranteed say on the matter. Their applications have no legal standing other than applying for a Convention only. Congress may allow the convention to create entirely new ratification method, basing on the 1787 precedence, so even then the state's role is unknown.
STAY AWAY FROM OUR PRECIOUS CONSTITUTION!
The Constitution does not need to be re-written, It needs to be re-read. If you have free and fair elections you wouldn't need "term limits"
Do not be fooled frens! This is their plan to end the constitution!
Considering I haven't seen many rings support this, idk what you are talking about lol.
They don't know either.
Edwin Vieria regarding the COS plot: https://rumble.com/v127bkj-convention-of-the-states-worse-than-pandoras-box-edwin-vieira-phd-jd.html