Simply watch the terrible theatrics of the archive footage. Once you watch that, with a touch of discernment, you can no longer trust anything nasa has spewed. God bless and God speed.
Hanging cloth still waves for a bit in vacuum when you're just bumped the pole, actually can wave for a bit longer due to the lack of air resistance before all of the energy is dissipated. Takes a bit more than 6th grade science to understand perhaps.
If you people were adults and living in the 60's you would know the whole Moon thing was BS! NASA can't even get the Artemis rocket off the ground because of all the engine problems! Where did they put this on Apollo 11?
So the 70's tech was that much more better than what we have today? Because as it stands we still cannot make it back to the moon. Why??? Elon is blasting cars into "space" we have the "space station". We also have videos of rats being blasted off into sppace on the rockets which is lol. That video of a rat on the back of a rocket thruster is lolzy.
You might be interested in this website: https://www.sibrel.com/ Check out the hoax confession video on the homepage...it's on YT, but it's been shadow-listed there so you can't search for it directly.
Here are a couple of heavy info sites to peruse for more info. This is one of those things you are just going to have to dig deep into for yourself if you want the truth.
We went back several times. A total of 6 moon landings were successful. Apollo 13 was unsuccessful. Going to the moon is EXPENSIVE; around 2.5% of the GDP over a 10-year period. We know what is there. It is a hunk of rock. So they stopped going.
The video of it was too perfect, how did a camera mounted to document the first steps survive the flight there? Or how was it tucked away?
Everything was planned in meticulous detail. Every second counted. They knew landing on the moon would be historic. To that end, there was a camera attached to a side of the LEM. Read up on it.
Everyone involved would certainly want to keep it hushed. Telling the truth now would be an embarrassment.
How would you possibly keep thousands upon thousands of people quiet if it was a hoax?
President Johnson was a slime ball and could have cooked this up.
No content here.
The suits just look to flimsy to withstand being in a harsh cold environment.
There is no air in space or on the moon. When inflated so that the astronaut can breathe, the suit becomes quite rigid.
when you look at the actual videos they look staged.
Yes, everything was "staged". It had to be. It was planned in meticulous detail, including having cameras to record as much as they could. This included the ability to recover film.
Here is a great audio book on the subject by Dave Mcgowan It's in 14 or chapters and hours and hours long. It looks at the science and the prevailing geopolitics of the day:
Firmly believe moon landing was real. Will be extremely disappointed if we find out that the trillions of dollars stolen from the American people was not used to establish the 1st space colony on the Dark Side of the Moon.
IMO, it's real. I'll try to answer some of your questions from my own knowledge. (I'm a power supply designer who has been R&D'ing propulsion systems on the side.)1. The answer has more to do with why we went. It was a JFK-inspired battle to be first with Russia. We didn't put the first satellite up, we didn't put the first man in space, but we beat Russia to the moon. The public was all behind it. Until we won. Then, the public interest declined. It was a huge financial endeavor and we were in Vietnam and had civil strife. NASA decided to go in a different direction and developed the 'reusable' space shuttle which never lived up to its financial promise, costing a $billion a flight. We had plans to build space stations to help build rockets in space. Finances and elections every 4 yrs makes that difficult. There was no profit margin. Just science advancement. A lot of it. But hard to justify the cost. 5. To be honest, the suits have many layers and at lower than atmospheric pressure to make them more maneuverable. They had a lot of experience in high altitude aircraft pressure suit design to lean on. I have vhs tapes from all the moon landings and what a difference in the quality in the last missions. I've listened to the autobiography audio book from Michael Collins, who describes in detail the whole mission experience. He was part of the first landing. These were the best military pilots we had. 8. The lights in a vacuum don't get picked up by any atmosphere (there is none) and shine brightly on the object they strike. 4. Johnson was a slimeball imo. lol.
that fuckin "spacecraft" looks like a complex box fort
gold aluminum foil and shower curtains
psyop against Russia..we have never been out near Earth orbit... one of my favorite vids on subject https://www.bitchute.com/video/Xi3JiHgGnFVB/
Not merely a psyop, the banksters who bankrolled this phony production made BILLION$$&
Once again, all the world’s a stage....and everything is a rich man’s trick.
Dont see how they could possibly ever reveal the truth. It would truly be the Great Awakening for a confession on a lie as big as this one.
lies to cover lies to cover lies..
Simply watch the terrible theatrics of the archive footage. Once you watch that, with a touch of discernment, you can no longer trust anything nasa has spewed. God bless and God speed.
Conspiracies.win is over that way along with the Flat Earthers.
Conspiracies.win doesn’t want them either.
https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/15Jn6esKL3/why-do-you-reject-the-wisdom-of-/c
I like how the flag waves in the wind on the moon, when moon has no atmosphere.
I was in 6th grade when i put it together. But not many other people get it. Im sure this community does.
Hanging cloth still waves for a bit in vacuum when you're just bumped the pole, actually can wave for a bit longer due to the lack of air resistance before all of the energy is dissipated. Takes a bit more than 6th grade science to understand perhaps.
Still fake. the way it flys is different that the vibe from implanting. Thanks for the insight im sure you are correct but i will believe its fake.
1:34 https://youtu.be/We1HqGQRXkE
I especially like how the msm deboonks this claim. Comments on this video are great.
The multiple camera angles from moon footage, how many were cameramen in the crew?
If you people were adults and living in the 60's you would know the whole Moon thing was BS! NASA can't even get the Artemis rocket off the ground because of all the engine problems! Where did they put this on Apollo 11?
So the 70's tech was that much more better than what we have today? Because as it stands we still cannot make it back to the moon. Why??? Elon is blasting cars into "space" we have the "space station". We also have videos of rats being blasted off into sppace on the rockets which is lol. That video of a rat on the back of a rocket thruster is lolzy.
You might be interested in this website: https://www.sibrel.com/ Check out the hoax confession video on the homepage...it's on YT, but it's been shadow-listed there so you can't search for it directly.
"we lost the technology so we can't go back"
First time in history that breakthrough technology has been developed and then thrown in the trash can.
Didn’t Q said the moon landing was real?
Isn’t there a reflector we can receive photons back from up there?
Wouldn’t it have been easier to go vs faking it in 1969?
I mean, I’ve pulled this off in KSP. I think it can be done. Lol
I do a legit LOL when people make the "easier to go vs faking it"
That literally makes NO sense whatsoever.
Believe it or not, rocket technology was farther along in the late 60’s than camera technology.
Nah, they just didnt reveal what was possible in camera tech till later. Technology is years behind what they really have.
Sound like the old , Photoshop wasnt available back them type response to all those fake images from Nasa.
FAKE AF.
The better question to ask is WHY fake it?
This guy Burt gets it👆🏻
It was real.
NASA didn’t go but Kevin Bacon and Tom Hanks did. 🥴
I'm 50/50 on it, like this thread :)
Here are a couple of heavy info sites to peruse for more info. This is one of those things you are just going to have to dig deep into for yourself if you want the truth.
https://www.aulis.com/index.html
http://apollotruth.atspace.co.uk/
Not fake.
We went back several times. A total of 6 moon landings were successful. Apollo 13 was unsuccessful. Going to the moon is EXPENSIVE; around 2.5% of the GDP over a 10-year period. We know what is there. It is a hunk of rock. So they stopped going.
Everything was planned in meticulous detail. Every second counted. They knew landing on the moon would be historic. To that end, there was a camera attached to a side of the LEM. Read up on it.
How would you possibly keep thousands upon thousands of people quiet if it was a hoax?
No content here.
There is no air in space or on the moon. When inflated so that the astronaut can breathe, the suit becomes quite rigid.
Yes, everything was "staged". It had to be. It was planned in meticulous detail, including having cameras to record as much as they could. This included the ability to recover film.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=780SAiciNbU
There is no atmosphere in space or on the moon. There is nothing to diffuse the sunlight. Yes, it's going to be very bright.
I like you
Thanks friend
#3 very compartmentalized. Only a relatively few HAD to know all the details.
Here is a great audio book on the subject by Dave Mcgowan It's in 14 or chapters and hours and hours long. It looks at the science and the prevailing geopolitics of the day:
transcript;
https://centerforaninformedamerica.com/moondoggie/
It convinced me that we didn't go.
Firmly believe moon landing was real. Will be extremely disappointed if we find out that the trillions of dollars stolen from the American people was not used to establish the 1st space colony on the Dark Side of the Moon.
IMO, it's real. I'll try to answer some of your questions from my own knowledge. (I'm a power supply designer who has been R&D'ing propulsion systems on the side.)1. The answer has more to do with why we went. It was a JFK-inspired battle to be first with Russia. We didn't put the first satellite up, we didn't put the first man in space, but we beat Russia to the moon. The public was all behind it. Until we won. Then, the public interest declined. It was a huge financial endeavor and we were in Vietnam and had civil strife. NASA decided to go in a different direction and developed the 'reusable' space shuttle which never lived up to its financial promise, costing a $billion a flight. We had plans to build space stations to help build rockets in space. Finances and elections every 4 yrs makes that difficult. There was no profit margin. Just science advancement. A lot of it. But hard to justify the cost. 5. To be honest, the suits have many layers and at lower than atmospheric pressure to make them more maneuverable. They had a lot of experience in high altitude aircraft pressure suit design to lean on. I have vhs tapes from all the moon landings and what a difference in the quality in the last missions. I've listened to the autobiography audio book from Michael Collins, who describes in detail the whole mission experience. He was part of the first landing. These were the best military pilots we had. 8. The lights in a vacuum don't get picked up by any atmosphere (there is none) and shine brightly on the object they strike. 4. Johnson was a slimeball imo. lol.
This guy says we went. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNzXze5Yza8