I think that is referring to all-cause mortality, not the subset of people that had some sort of illness (however, you are correct that the hospital "protocol" using ventilators was fatal for many that were subjected to it). That will probably become its own separate lawsuit.
If those numbers were for all-cause mortality, it will need to be corrected for age groups (a lot of people that get injected are old, a lot of those that don't tend to be younger, etc.)
Even so, that is too big of a delta to not have some sort of clear correlation between the injections and increased mortality.
I was going to say, this data needs to be stratified by age, but… scrolls, scrolls, oh yea, they have that too… and these shots seems to increase the odds of all-cause death for every age bracket.
This is an absolutely useless statistic. It doesn't prove a thing.
Why? Because the characteristics of vaxxed group are FUNDAMENTALLY DIFFERENT than the unvaxxed group.
How so? The elderly were far more likely to get vaxxed (as were immuno-compromised, etc), and therefore the 'vaxxed group' are far more likely to die simply because of advanced age, existing sickness, etc.
Personally, I think the shots are terrible, but be very careful when getting hyped about statistics. They very often lie.
I'm glad to hear that. Most of the statistics are so obfuscated that it is impossible to extract anything meaningful.
Unfortunately, it's almost impossible to quantify how much more 'baseline-sickly' the vaxxed group is (because the sickly were pushed harder, and have stories like 'I am immuno-compromised, so my doctor told me I REALLY need to take the vaxx', etc).
Also, 'scared' people (the ones who are more likely to get vaxxed) are more likely to die (especially with a constant barrage of fear-messaging from the MSM). I have NO idea how much this would skew numbers -- I'm just saying that it's a factor.
Still, the age bracketed data helps make the findings more significant. Thanks for pointing that out.
You got downdooted for being skeptical?! That's the main reason this community exists. Your response to being informed of the bracketed data was dignified and civil. We need more of that.
He got downvoted for not even bothering to read the article before commenting. the Age segregated information is contained in the article. Maybe you should also try reading the subject matter before commenting.
We can all just attack each other for our mistakes, or we can encourage each other to do better and be better. I assume he was commenting on the large text image of the post and hadn't scrolled down to find the link in the comments yet. When this was explained to him, he thanked the commenter. I love seeing tense exchanges dissolve into friendly concurrence.
And you can bet that those who were unvaxxed and died, were killed by the hospital protocol
I think that is referring to all-cause mortality, not the subset of people that had some sort of illness (however, you are correct that the hospital "protocol" using ventilators was fatal for many that were subjected to it). That will probably become its own separate lawsuit.
If those numbers were for all-cause mortality, it will need to be corrected for age groups (a lot of people that get injected are old, a lot of those that don't tend to be younger, etc.)
Even so, that is too big of a delta to not have some sort of clear correlation between the injections and increased mortality.
@BrittRepublican https://rb.gy/mpmgi2
THANKS FOR THE LINK.....SHARING
uBlock Origin has prevented the following page from loading:
https://rb.gy/mpmgi2
Because of the following filter:
||rb.gy^
Found in: EasyList
I was going to say, this data needs to be stratified by age, but… scrolls, scrolls, oh yea, they have that too… and these shots seems to increase the odds of all-cause death for every age bracket.
Wow.
1 of 172 not vaccinated people, what the fuck is that based on ?
Yeah I want to know how they came to these numbers that seems really high.
This is an absolutely useless statistic. It doesn't prove a thing.
Why? Because the characteristics of vaxxed group are FUNDAMENTALLY DIFFERENT than the unvaxxed group.
How so? The elderly were far more likely to get vaxxed (as were immuno-compromised, etc), and therefore the 'vaxxed group' are far more likely to die simply because of advanced age, existing sickness, etc.
Personally, I think the shots are terrible, but be very careful when getting hyped about statistics. They very often lie.
Bill gates favorite book. How to lie with statistics.
Read the article. They have age bracketed data.
I'm glad to hear that. Most of the statistics are so obfuscated that it is impossible to extract anything meaningful.
Unfortunately, it's almost impossible to quantify how much more 'baseline-sickly' the vaxxed group is (because the sickly were pushed harder, and have stories like 'I am immuno-compromised, so my doctor told me I REALLY need to take the vaxx', etc).
Also, 'scared' people (the ones who are more likely to get vaxxed) are more likely to die (especially with a constant barrage of fear-messaging from the MSM). I have NO idea how much this would skew numbers -- I'm just saying that it's a factor.
Still, the age bracketed data helps make the findings more significant. Thanks for pointing that out.
You got downdooted for being skeptical?! That's the main reason this community exists. Your response to being informed of the bracketed data was dignified and civil. We need more of that.
Thanks for the comment.
We are facing unprecedented evil in this world. We need to fight it with real facts, and there are plenty of solid facts to fight with...
If a normie can dismiss our 'evidence' (as easily as I did), then we need to shift our attention to solid, unquestionable evidence.
Just trying to help the cause...
He got downvoted for not even bothering to read the article before commenting. the Age segregated information is contained in the article. Maybe you should also try reading the subject matter before commenting.
We can all just attack each other for our mistakes, or we can encourage each other to do better and be better. I assume he was commenting on the large text image of the post and hadn't scrolled down to find the link in the comments yet. When this was explained to him, he thanked the commenter. I love seeing tense exchanges dissolve into friendly concurrence.
This is why I come here
So you didnt read the entire article? The part where it breaks it down in different age groups?
"Safe and effective" - yeah, for [them]. Never forget context and point of view is everything in this strange war.
1 in 73? That's all?
So Far… unfortunately it’s still early based on what I’ve been researching.. Gitmo for those complicit!!😡
Yep..
So far.
1:172 feels like a lot still
About 1% of people die every year in the normal course of things.
Wiki lists the UK as 0.88% That's 1 in 114, so the unvaxxed are dying at less than normal rate and the vaxxed at more.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_mortality_rate
it is horrifying!