No different from USA at the end of the day. Our governments are being interfered with by persons not yet identified. If they don't like the plan they crash the economy! Boris & Rishi was doing a good job of that before. MPs said enough!
Message 'if we don't like the people in authority we will get rid of them!'
Is that true though? A problem with "The Plan" (per Q), at least with regards to an outside view of it, is that it looks exactly the same as the Globalist Plan. The only difference is (presumably) how easy it is to see, and hopefully the end result (because of how easy it is to see). Thus project Warp Speed. If it goes faster (like it is), massive amounts of people see the fraud.
There are always a percent of people who see the fraud. In the Soviet takeover for example, quite a few fought back. It just wasn't enough. It is the percent of the population who see the fraud that is the key to which side wins.
The only path out of the slavery we have been living in for millennia is for We The People to stand up for ourselves. We need to eliminate the control structures that have been built by the aristocracy. It isn't about "getting the right people in leadership," it's about understanding that the entire concept of a Centralization of Authority is the fraud. It doesn't matter who is leading the UK (or the US, etc.). It is coming to a deep seated realization that our whole concept of a National Government is a fraud. This fraud is based on the frauds of Rulership and Jurisdiction.
Rulership, i.e. Central Authority inevitably infringes on our Inalienable Rights. It can't do otherwise. This fraud AKA what it means "to Rule." is ultimately a fraud of Jurisdiction. Each of us is the King or Queen of our own lives (and in any reasonable society, our property). We are all Sovereign, and that is our jurisdiction. When a Sovereign Government, AKA a Central Authority declares jurisdiction over our lives, our property, "for the greater good" (or National Security, or whatever reason they give) that is where the fraud happens. When the Central Authority builds "infrastructure," (physical, economic, etc.) that requires us to rely on it, it allows that Central Authority to claim jurisdiction over our lives. It is through creating need that this jurisdictional fraud by a Central Authority is implemented.
In order for We The People to get rid of that Central Authority and gain full Jurisdiction of our own lives we must feel the need to get rid of our Centralized Authority Governmental System entirely.
That's going to take a lot of pain. I think we have to see the "End of the World" plan (AKA The Utopia Plan) in it's entirety. We have to see where such a system inevitably leads (through their jurisdictional fraud), in this case at Warp Speed so the fraud is revealed to a large enough percentage of the population.
I don't know how long it will take, but I think we still have a ways to go.
As I understand it the Q plan is to return power to the people, whilst at the same time exposing the DS (add your preferred descriptor) and have them removed by legal means.
I am uncertain what your point is, it seems you want to live in some sort of non-governmental commune. Not sure hoe you economic situation would work, how are amenities provided and how are decisions taken.
What I have presented was what my research suggests is the real problem. It wasn't intended to provide a solution.
Not to say I can't make arguments for solutions, I can and have many times. The first step in any solution however, is in everyone seeing the REAL PROBLEM. The problem is not the Cabal (per se), but what they have done. What they have done is create the belief in the need for a Centralized Authority. We believe we must be Ruled. By this belief they can put in whatever they want. They can put in a "good Ruler" when they need to dial it back a bit, but the Centralized Authority is still in charge, committing the same fraud.
You assume I suggested a solution ("some sort of non-governmental commune") when I have offered nothing in that regard. I certainly didn't suggest anything (that I am aware of) that would promote what I quoted from you.
how are amenities provided and how are decisions taken
What "amenities" do you suggest we need (presumably you mean from some Central Authority)? Why do amenities need to be "provided" (given to us) by anyone? Who is providing them? Who is paying for them? Who is making them? How are they taken from those who are paying for them and/or making them and being provided to you?
Who is making decisions? What decisions need to be made?
If I live in a town, do I need a National Government to decide what the towns school teaches? Do I need a National Government (or any group of people) to force my children to learn what they deign important? Do I need a National Government to decide what are the best laws for the local community? Do I need a State Government for that? What decisions could a National and/or State Government possibly need to make to help me live in harmony with my neighbors?
Things like National Security are only necessary because the Cabal makes all wars. Things like International Relations are only necessary because the Cabal runs all countries. We The People never make war. A group of people will never attack another group of people unless they need food, or some other necessity, or because there is a propaganda campaign to make people believe there is a need (that almost certainly doesn't actually exist).
It is the Cabal that takes over countries for more resources. They do it all the time because they want it all. And they convince us to kill each other so they can achieve their goals. "National Security" is a fraud. It is a Con. The Cabal is always both sides.
I think just like you. It's amazing how people will imagine that you have proposed a fully fledged solution, when all you did was point out some obvious problems with the current system. I too also have some potential solutions, or at least starting points, up my sleeves.
The USA is unique as to how it is set up and run and our constitution that backs all of us up. If you want to have a nation, you need a "government" or a leader. USA is set up so that there are many checks and balances between the elected Federal Government, elected State government and we the people. Our government has specific jobs and duties they are supposed to be doing beyond anything else they come up with to do. THE current government is undermining everything it is elected to do. Keep our nation's Sovereignty protected is a big one and it is failing that big time atm. Nations need a head because, Nations need to interact with other Nations and Need a national military to keep other nations from overrunning the place and taking over. Trade with other Nations is another reason to have a government. Government's that are too large (who bi pass the checks n balances to get what they want) or too small (dictator) end up screwing everyone in that nation over. IMO.
Because he's not permanent. It's a means to an end. He's a central figure that's shined a light on the corrupt establishment where the power is centralized.
Anarchy doesn't mean "no government" or "no leader" or "chaos," or "no laws," it means No Ruler. That is the definition. It literally means "without ruler." A Ruler, by definition, is someone (a King e.g.) or group of someones (an aristocracy e.g.) who has more Rights than the individual. They have the power to take away from the individual if they so choose. They have that Right, and the individual has no Right to stop them. A government "of, by, and for" the people can't have more Rights than the individuals that make up that society. Because the society is the government.
The word "anarchy" has been promoted with negative connotations because if people ever realize what it really means on a fundamental level they will revolt immediately. I don't just mean what I have exposed here, but I mean deep down inside, to grok what it means to live without a ruler.
The Cabal Trains us to think the way you have just suggested through school (made by them) and propaganda (they have always owned all the media). The "more basic instincts" that need to be kept in check have always been manipulated by their propaganda. I suggest you have no idea what our "more basic instincts" really are without the Cabal leading us around by the nose for thousands of years. I know I certainly don't.
I agree with most of the stuff you put on GAW but this isnt something I could ever get behind no matter what you want to call it or how you want to justify it. Men require government to contain their baser instincts.
The problem isnt government, it is that the People failed in our duty to remain vigilant in our inspection and control of the government. We got fat and lazy and allowed material gain to rule our worlds. We allowed the government to keep secrets from us. We allowed tyrannical creep through the decades. We gave up Liberty for temporary safety and material goods.
How this happened is debatable but I believe we fell victims to a flawless marketing campaign from things like the Saturday Evening Posts pics of idyllic American life, to images from Hollywood and TV and even the concept of "The American Dream" and "two cars in every garage". Comfort became our God and political intrigue and sexual indiscretion became our national joke. "You cant fight city hall". The casting couch. Keeping up with the Jones'. Our culture is filled with these "truisms".
What we face now isnt the governments fault. It is our fault for allowing it. Governments will always trend towards tyranny. Our Founding Fathers knew this and made a document that should have protected us through time. But we forgot what the words meant. It is a Republic, if you can keep it.
My opinion is that the foundation is sound. The rest of the building is full of rot. And that is our fault.
There is only one corporation in the world, and always has been. The idea that "big business" likes things one way or another has nothing to do with reality. They own everything. They make the rules for, and the rules that appear to be against them. They are always both sides in every conflict, including the making of laws.
For example, all laws that promote "regulations" designed to "limit" big business were written by them. For a couple rather important examples of this, see the Clayton Anti-Trust Act, which is America's "most important anti-big business legislation." It was written by John W. Davis, who was the personal lawyer of Rockefeller, Morgan, and Rothschild (among about a thousand other things, like Woodrow Wilson's Solicitor General, founding President of the CFR, etc., etc.). The Federal Reserve Act, the greatest piece of economic fuckery ever, was written for Woodrow Wilson and crew by Carter Glass, who, 20 years later, also happened to write the act that created the Securities and Exchange Commission, which was designed to ensure that the Stock Market wouldn't be manipulated because of what happened when it was manipulated all to hell to kick off The Great Depression. The SEC, rather than perform this function, insures fuckery in the Stock Market because of how it actually works, through Centralization of Authority using almost the exact same set up as the Federal Reserve does to achieve similar goals with the money supply.
Globalist 1:0 People of UK
No different from USA at the end of the day. Our governments are being interfered with by persons not yet identified. If they don't like the plan they crash the economy! Boris & Rishi was doing a good job of that before. MPs said enough!
Message 'if we don't like the people in authority we will get rid of them!'
Is that true though? A problem with "The Plan" (per Q), at least with regards to an outside view of it, is that it looks exactly the same as the Globalist Plan. The only difference is (presumably) how easy it is to see, and hopefully the end result (because of how easy it is to see). Thus project Warp Speed. If it goes faster (like it is), massive amounts of people see the fraud.
There are always a percent of people who see the fraud. In the Soviet takeover for example, quite a few fought back. It just wasn't enough. It is the percent of the population who see the fraud that is the key to which side wins.
The only path out of the slavery we have been living in for millennia is for We The People to stand up for ourselves. We need to eliminate the control structures that have been built by the aristocracy. It isn't about "getting the right people in leadership," it's about understanding that the entire concept of a Centralization of Authority is the fraud. It doesn't matter who is leading the UK (or the US, etc.). It is coming to a deep seated realization that our whole concept of a National Government is a fraud. This fraud is based on the frauds of Rulership and Jurisdiction.
Rulership, i.e. Central Authority inevitably infringes on our Inalienable Rights. It can't do otherwise. This fraud AKA what it means "to Rule." is ultimately a fraud of Jurisdiction. Each of us is the King or Queen of our own lives (and in any reasonable society, our property). We are all Sovereign, and that is our jurisdiction. When a Sovereign Government, AKA a Central Authority declares jurisdiction over our lives, our property, "for the greater good" (or National Security, or whatever reason they give) that is where the fraud happens. When the Central Authority builds "infrastructure," (physical, economic, etc.) that requires us to rely on it, it allows that Central Authority to claim jurisdiction over our lives. It is through creating need that this jurisdictional fraud by a Central Authority is implemented.
In order for We The People to get rid of that Central Authority and gain full Jurisdiction of our own lives we must feel the need to get rid of our Centralized Authority Governmental System entirely.
That's going to take a lot of pain. I think we have to see the "End of the World" plan (AKA The Utopia Plan) in it's entirety. We have to see where such a system inevitably leads (through their jurisdictional fraud), in this case at Warp Speed so the fraud is revealed to a large enough percentage of the population.
I don't know how long it will take, but I think we still have a ways to go.
As I understand it the Q plan is to return power to the people, whilst at the same time exposing the DS (add your preferred descriptor) and have them removed by legal means.
I am uncertain what your point is, it seems you want to live in some sort of non-governmental commune. Not sure hoe you economic situation would work, how are amenities provided and how are decisions taken.
What I have presented was what my research suggests is the real problem. It wasn't intended to provide a solution.
Not to say I can't make arguments for solutions, I can and have many times. The first step in any solution however, is in everyone seeing the REAL PROBLEM. The problem is not the Cabal (per se), but what they have done. What they have done is create the belief in the need for a Centralized Authority. We believe we must be Ruled. By this belief they can put in whatever they want. They can put in a "good Ruler" when they need to dial it back a bit, but the Centralized Authority is still in charge, committing the same fraud.
You assume I suggested a solution ("some sort of non-governmental commune") when I have offered nothing in that regard. I certainly didn't suggest anything (that I am aware of) that would promote what I quoted from you.
What "amenities" do you suggest we need (presumably you mean from some Central Authority)? Why do amenities need to be "provided" (given to us) by anyone? Who is providing them? Who is paying for them? Who is making them? How are they taken from those who are paying for them and/or making them and being provided to you?
Who is making decisions? What decisions need to be made?
If I live in a town, do I need a National Government to decide what the towns school teaches? Do I need a National Government (or any group of people) to force my children to learn what they deign important? Do I need a National Government to decide what are the best laws for the local community? Do I need a State Government for that? What decisions could a National and/or State Government possibly need to make to help me live in harmony with my neighbors?
Things like National Security are only necessary because the Cabal makes all wars. Things like International Relations are only necessary because the Cabal runs all countries. We The People never make war. A group of people will never attack another group of people unless they need food, or some other necessity, or because there is a propaganda campaign to make people believe there is a need (that almost certainly doesn't actually exist).
It is the Cabal that takes over countries for more resources. They do it all the time because they want it all. And they convince us to kill each other so they can achieve their goals. "National Security" is a fraud. It is a Con. The Cabal is always both sides.
I think just like you. It's amazing how people will imagine that you have proposed a fully fledged solution, when all you did was point out some obvious problems with the current system. I too also have some potential solutions, or at least starting points, up my sleeves.
The USA is unique as to how it is set up and run and our constitution that backs all of us up. If you want to have a nation, you need a "government" or a leader. USA is set up so that there are many checks and balances between the elected Federal Government, elected State government and we the people. Our government has specific jobs and duties they are supposed to be doing beyond anything else they come up with to do. THE current government is undermining everything it is elected to do. Keep our nation's Sovereignty protected is a big one and it is failing that big time atm. Nations need a head because, Nations need to interact with other Nations and Need a national military to keep other nations from overrunning the place and taking over. Trade with other Nations is another reason to have a government. Government's that are too large (who bi pass the checks n balances to get what they want) or too small (dictator) end up screwing everyone in that nation over. IMO.
What is a "nation" and why would you want one?
GEOTUS stands for God emperor correct? Where does that figure into entirely abolished centralized authority Governmental system?
Because he's not permanent. It's a means to an end. He's a central figure that's shined a light on the corrupt establishment where the power is centralized.
That is the right question to ask.
Great comment. Thanks for taking the time to write it.
So basically you espouse anarchy.
Ill pass. Men need government to keep their more base instincts in check.
Anarchy doesn't mean "no government" or "no leader" or "chaos," or "no laws," it means No Ruler. That is the definition. It literally means "without ruler." A Ruler, by definition, is someone (a King e.g.) or group of someones (an aristocracy e.g.) who has more Rights than the individual. They have the power to take away from the individual if they so choose. They have that Right, and the individual has no Right to stop them. A government "of, by, and for" the people can't have more Rights than the individuals that make up that society. Because the society is the government.
The word "anarchy" has been promoted with negative connotations because if people ever realize what it really means on a fundamental level they will revolt immediately. I don't just mean what I have exposed here, but I mean deep down inside, to grok what it means to live without a ruler.
The Cabal Trains us to think the way you have just suggested through school (made by them) and propaganda (they have always owned all the media). The "more basic instincts" that need to be kept in check have always been manipulated by their propaganda. I suggest you have no idea what our "more basic instincts" really are without the Cabal leading us around by the nose for thousands of years. I know I certainly don't.
I agree with most of the stuff you put on GAW but this isnt something I could ever get behind no matter what you want to call it or how you want to justify it. Men require government to contain their baser instincts.
The problem isnt government, it is that the People failed in our duty to remain vigilant in our inspection and control of the government. We got fat and lazy and allowed material gain to rule our worlds. We allowed the government to keep secrets from us. We allowed tyrannical creep through the decades. We gave up Liberty for temporary safety and material goods.
How this happened is debatable but I believe we fell victims to a flawless marketing campaign from things like the Saturday Evening Posts pics of idyllic American life, to images from Hollywood and TV and even the concept of "The American Dream" and "two cars in every garage". Comfort became our God and political intrigue and sexual indiscretion became our national joke. "You cant fight city hall". The casting couch. Keeping up with the Jones'. Our culture is filled with these "truisms".
What we face now isnt the governments fault. It is our fault for allowing it. Governments will always trend towards tyranny. Our Founding Fathers knew this and made a document that should have protected us through time. But we forgot what the words meant. It is a Republic, if you can keep it.
My opinion is that the foundation is sound. The rest of the building is full of rot. And that is our fault.
How about this for a good and proper way to start? http://reclaimingtherepublic.org/
What if that was the intended plan by the WHs?
High Tax High Spend Big Government provides many opportunities for certain big business's. Just like all the money pouring into Ukraine.
The Crashing of the economy was mostly fearmongering - just like covid jabs etc.
The conservative party didn't elect the right person so try again, try try try again until to elect the person we want you to.
There is only one corporation in the world, and always has been. The idea that "big business" likes things one way or another has nothing to do with reality. They own everything. They make the rules for, and the rules that appear to be against them. They are always both sides in every conflict, including the making of laws.
For example, all laws that promote "regulations" designed to "limit" big business were written by them. For a couple rather important examples of this, see the Clayton Anti-Trust Act, which is America's "most important anti-big business legislation." It was written by John W. Davis, who was the personal lawyer of Rockefeller, Morgan, and Rothschild (among about a thousand other things, like Woodrow Wilson's Solicitor General, founding President of the CFR, etc., etc.). The Federal Reserve Act, the greatest piece of economic fuckery ever, was written for Woodrow Wilson and crew by Carter Glass, who, 20 years later, also happened to write the act that created the Securities and Exchange Commission, which was designed to ensure that the Stock Market wouldn't be manipulated because of what happened when it was manipulated all to hell to kick off The Great Depression. The SEC, rather than perform this function, insures fuckery in the Stock Market because of how it actually works, through Centralization of Authority using almost the exact same set up as the Federal Reserve does to achieve similar goals with the money supply.