Remember, remember the 5th of November. "Will you answer the call? Your Country needs you!"
(media.greatawakening.win)
REMEMBER... REMEMBER... TO VOTE!
Comments (44)
sorted by:
Remember, Remember
The 8th of November
The Democrat Treason and Plot
I know of no reason
Why the Democrat Treason
Should ever be forgot!
Top KEK! We have a rhyming wordsmith frog on the team...hehe
'V for Vendetta' (2005): https://www.imdb.com/video/vi4276093
-Natalie Portman's character "Evey" who is target of the State
-V character (wearing the Anonymous mask)
Full movie: https://123movies.net/watch/eLxRYyvO-v-for-vendetta.html
Anon Theatre: https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZDcTPAvx/-anon-theatre-v-for-vendetta-200/c/
Dominoes fall scene (predicting future events): https://greatawakening.win/p/15JTtt2kTs/movie-scenes-that-predicted-the-/c/
Anon Comic Club: https://greatawakening.win/p/15K6qHdxxf/-anon-comic-club-v-for-vendetta-/
It is interesting how many of the Leftards get used to deliver many of these pro individual rights and freedom messages. I have come to the conclusion that they are oblivious, low IQ inbred cabal family members that have been “placed” in their positions.
Stupid doesn’t know it’s stupid because...it’s stupid.
Rofl
There were some comms pointing to the 5th. I hope something happens.
Note that many cabal events are planned for Saturdays because that is their "religious Day" per the origin from Saturn which is synonymous with Satan. This means 1. They are predictable due to their tight adherence to the sun/satan religion per the day/numerology, and 2. There likely are White Hat counters to whatever they have planned.
This is also why the White Hats poke the cabal players on Saturdays...because it completely enrages them and forces them to make mistakes.
Guy Fawkes was right.
The Gunpowder Plot and Guy Fawkes: https://infogalactic.com/info/Guy_Fawkes
Note that he was friendly with the Jesuits and either knowingly or unknowingly may have been a pawn of the cabal. But the whole history and incident appears to be POSITIVELY getting weaponized against the cabal, imo.
At a single glance I was unable to figure out if King James I was a good guy or bad guy or puppet of someone, but the "restoration of the Crown to a Catholic", presumably loyal to the Vatican sounds like a cabal-controlled Vatican play. And I think it is pretty certain that the Vatican and the Jesuits were under the control of the cabal at the time of the Gunpowder Plot in 1604-5.
Well King James 1 DID order an English translation of the Bible, that was first published in 1611. The bible was gobbledegook to anyone who had not gone to Public School (What Brits call Private school) and University, to learn enough Latin to comprehend it.
This gave the common man, who at least could read English, a chance to read the Bible. Vatican seethed at that idea, because their acolytes had a mysterioso hold over their flocks, by mumbling in a foreign language - this lends credence to the Vatican plot - brewed to stop the publication.
However, I don't believe much of what was said about the restoration of a 'Catholic' to the throne. Sure James was a protestant, but his mother was a Catholic - as I was saying before, people kind of picked and chose whatever in those days - it wasn't genetic. Catholics hoped that they would be relieved from persecution by James, and the translation of the bible could be seen as a gesture of goodwill to the people. He was also seen as a moderate, so I kind of find it hard to imagine that people could get worked up about which side of the bed James got up out of.
Also on reading the history of GF, he was a mercenary, so I don't think he was necessarily devoted to whatever cause, just that he was paid to do it - again, this lends credence to the plot-a-la-Vatican, who had deep pockets.
It gets confusing after this, if one holds on to the Vatican plot thing - there is the fact that James II was a catholic (he married for love, and she was catholic), and he was subsequently chased out, because folks were thoroughly believing this anti-catholic nonsense by now, so ... is this a sign that the Vatican lost their hold?- This led to the William & Mary thing, oh great - a Dutch King - , but also, the Old pretender, hiding in Poland, and Bonnie Prince Charlie (1745). Were they catholic? Who knows, perhaps, but they were descendants of Kings, who had a claim to the throne, regardless of their faith, and many supported especially Charlie's return.
It all gets so confusing.
King James was also obsessed with the occult, he came out with a demonology book.
Perhaps the Catholics didn’t want the religion watered down & perverted the way Protestants had re-written & interpreted the 1,600 year old religion.
Before King James, there was only ONE Bible & a handful of “Christian” denominations; publishing the Bible was a way to dilute the faith & weaken Rome.
It’s no coincidence Freemasonry re-emerged from England.
I think the short answer is King James' efforts on the Bible were controlled by Vatican plants to "limit the damage" of something they could not stop. It is very possible that the whole Guy Fawkes thing was one big false flag used to justify something else. Once we find that "something else" connection, the whole event will likely make much more sense.
It is very possible that the planned attack on King James might have been to stop the Bible translation project or something else he was doing. I have not looked into the timing of that event relative to other things that were going on, but "timeline analysis" usually reveals some relationships.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible_translations
I doubt it were about bible really. It were serious politics.
Thing is Britain become "protestant" after decision of Henry VIII who created anglicanism simply because he had problems with getting divorces (because he wanted male heir). He ruled about 40 years. Next were his only son.He ruled 5 years. Next ruller were "Bloody" Mary who were Catholic and wanted to make Britain Catholic again.Yes,she ordered to burn protestant dissidents,but let's look WHY she had to do it:
Despite the fact she was only lawful daughter from his first and lawful marriage ! From royal and legitimate princess and heir to the throne to almost servant,to bastard by law... Daughter to a queen,become the "bastard" to let the King marry Ann Boleyn ,daughter of simple vice-count in the times when those things about "nobility" were taken so serious... greavious insult i think.
Her father killed already about 500 Catholics.Thing is Catholics were then PERSECUTED in England too. And executed too as we see...
Neither her father nor her brother were doing anything to let Mary her find a husband, she even wanted to run from England, she married at least Philip IInd of Spain at the age of 37. Those invention of "Anglicanism" by her father ruined her life. And she is called bloody because she ordered to kill 280 protestants.When I repeat - her father were responsible for killing over 500 Catholics and "it is nothing". She ruled 5 years only and died because of ovarian cancer or something.
And again Elisabeth I,her sister were enforcing Anglicanism. Of course she were, whole Anglicanism were invented to make her father marry her mother !
Elisabeth ruled about 40 years or more. Fawkes conspiracy were in 7-th year of rule of Jacob Stuart who were of course NOT the son of Elisabeth,but the son of Mary Stuart catholic queen of Scotland murdered/executed at the order of Elisabeth - he were raised as protestant,but it was mostly politician thing again.
It were all about politics and survival,because catholics and protestants were obviously fighting each other and murdering each others then. Come on, 8 years later begun bloody 30-years war which were ruining Europe (especially Germany). All because of religious and politician shit. Catholics simply had hope they would somehow "stop those filthy degenerate protestantism" in England.
Simply Catholics were persecuted side hoping that they would somehow win against "heresy" existing less than 100 years and there were almost as many of them as protestants then. It wouldn't be good for protestants of course,but that were the medieval times where there were no Ecomunism shit and religious differences were taken too bloody (yes: too bloody...) serious to be solved by debates instead of by violence.
So u/Sadness: it wasabout restoring Catholic rule,not just "Catholic on the throne". It was about stopping persecution of Catholics and starting persecution of Protestants instead. King was like president of USA.Alone without support of administration power of the president is quite limited.And so power of the king was. Court officials and house of the lords were those administration then.And that one officials were protestants. Do you REALLY think that such explosion of more than 20 barrels of gunpowder would kill only the king ? No,of course not. Fawkes wanted to blow up whole HOUSE OF LORDS ! Blow up whole fucking parliament not just only king. But as king were most important person there and only assault on the king were treated so seriously he is commonly known as man conspiring against the king.
Interesting that this is the very end of “V for Vendetta” with all of Parliament building getting completely demolished. Clearly symbolic of removal of yoke of oppression.
1605 was a year of three popes, if that can be a thing.
Yes it is a thing.Thing proving papacy considered as unified force itself were not so strong then.
But from another side - getting some legitimate cardinals from England who would be able to vote for some candidate to become a Pope...
Years later in 1621 conclave looked this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1621_papal_conclave 15 votes first,when previous pope in 1605 had 60 votes majority.
So it is possible having 1 or 2 legitimate cardinals from England were nice idea for some faction within Vatican. But really in those times Catholics were simply persecuted in England,and it was enough,blowing up the parliament with lords and king inside looked for Fawkes and his friends as nice idea.
Queen Elizabeth I was a hardcore occultist. She brought to her court John Dee, the magician who predicted Catholic Queen Mary’s death to the precise date.
Wow, most interesting. Clearly some habbenings there to dig into.
It's kinda weird, because the Dutch suffered under the Spanish, and William of Orange is a hero, and became King of England.
But, as you can see the people of that time switched sides willy-nilly, and the division between catholics and others was muddled.
Of course, it is not a good idea to blow up the houses of parliament, even today.
This is intentional. They have intentionally muddied the history so we can't figure it out. As far as the Dutch Republic goes, it also was targeted for demolition either in 1589 or 1689 I can't figure out which. I believe the whole Tulip mania was engineered by the cabal and I think that was in mid 1600s, so likely it started 1589. Can't figure out who got attacked in 1689 for sure. It may have been the first attack on Russia? Here is my 100 year cabal operating plan attempted decode: https://greatawakening.win/p/15Ir27hJv4/repost-the-q-year-on-the-89s-891/
Orange became King of England after he ran a coup against King James II, who converted to Roman Catholicism the year prior.
yes
“Protestant” Queen Elizabeth I was an occultist (see John Dee). Her “Protestant” mom was excuted for Witchcraft. King Henry the VIII started his own Anglican false “religion” with him as the head of the church & state. This Illegitimate occultic regime stole Catholic lands, Catholic Property, Catholic Church & persecuted those faithful Catholics that didn’t worship this false religion.
I think Guy Fawkes was based & attempting to return England to TRUE Christianity.
He deffo wasn't a leftie.
05-Nov-2018 5:14:18 PM CST; QPost 2425
https://qposts.online/?q=2425&s=postnum
Note that Election Day 2024 is also on November 5, and that would be a 6 Year Delta.
this reminds me, what ever happened to that hacker group, anonymous? if they were that good, wouldnt they have exposed some of the voter fraud by now? or were they nothing more than a govt op to confuse the sheep?
I think half got co-opted by intelligence agencies, and the other half went underground and became 4chan and 8chan.
It is time that our government relearned this
Lesson 1: Nov8
Remember Remember the 3rd of November (damn it!)
Nobody here is likely to forget until Trump's victory speech on Nov 5, 2024.
Watch this last night.
If you don't vote, a Democrat will vote for you.
Then you are complicit in the enslavement of humanity.
There are times when I could not vote, and so I tried to find one or two people to go vote when I couldn't.