NG can only be activated by president or a state governor.
So who did it?
Article has a strange error:
“What you notice is 54 states and territories—not everybody's doing it, and those that are have invested in cyber talent and cyber missions for years,” said Brig. Gen. Gent Welsh, the assistant adjutant general and commander of the Washington Air National Guard.
54 states?
Fourteen states have ongoing cyber and election security support: Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Iowa, Illinois, Louisiana, North Carolina, New Mexico, New York, Pennsylvania, Washington, and West Virginia.
Why would the corrupt Illinois governor (Pritzker) invite the military to watch his election in 2022? Is he really that desperate for sheep to see the race as legitimate. I don't buy that. Almost all of these states have democratic governors.
They wouldn't want more eyeballs on their cheat, they'd want less.
So who is it??? Any real patriot would know not to forge Q. It must either be someone who is laughing at us & wants to get their jollies off. OR is is the black hats
In either case they are a black hat
Evil is that which imitates good - to almost be the twin
I don't understand this line of thinking. We have so many newbies. These comms are for them. They are to excite and make them feel part of this mission now. You are no longer the primary audience. Anyone you have tried to reach has either believed you or flat out rejected you at this point. Newbies are our best shot for sharing this with people within their spheres. We have a seasoned member of this board rejecting them and hurting their intended purpose. The nature of the posts can't change over time? Be strategic for this point in the mission?
The nature of Q posts changed a lot, as if more than one personality. The comment above that there was too much data than needed. Q posted some very long posts with lots of info. in them. The trip code is correct
I agree. This post has only two declarative sentences. The rest are questions. I don't grasp the logic of "Oh, this can't be Q. He isn't telling us 'not enough'." How can he tell us anything new, if we insist that it not deviate from the past? I think somebody wants to take a ride in a time machine, "back to the Good Old Q Posts" when we were all watching a movie, and could argue about when/if the Storm would happen!
Very… way too much data when it’s not needed. Q was short and sweet where Q needs to be and didn’t force a whole load of direct info like this
But it does ask a very big question:
That's an excellent question.
https://www.defenseone.com/defense-systems/2022/11/more-dozen-states-have-activated-national-guard-secure-midterm-elections/379412/
NG can only be activated by president or a state governor.
So who did it?
Article has a strange error:
54 states?
Why would the corrupt Illinois governor (Pritzker) invite the military to watch his election in 2022? Is he really that desperate for sheep to see the race as legitimate. I don't buy that. Almost all of these states have democratic governors.
They wouldn't want more eyeballs on their cheat, they'd want less.
"54 states?"
No. 54 states and territories.
SpaceForce was ordered by the commander in chief djt
Since the governors can't be expected to do this (especially Washington), we are returned to the question: Who is the President?
So who is it??? Any real patriot would know not to forge Q. It must either be someone who is laughing at us & wants to get their jollies off. OR is is the black hats
In either case they are a black hat
Evil is that which imitates good - to almost be the twin
I don't understand this line of thinking. We have so many newbies. These comms are for them. They are to excite and make them feel part of this mission now. You are no longer the primary audience. Anyone you have tried to reach has either believed you or flat out rejected you at this point. Newbies are our best shot for sharing this with people within their spheres. We have a seasoned member of this board rejecting them and hurting their intended purpose. The nature of the posts can't change over time? Be strategic for this point in the mission?
The nature of Q posts changed a lot, as if more than one personality. The comment above that there was too much data than needed. Q posted some very long posts with lots of info. in them. The trip code is correct
I agree. This post has only two declarative sentences. The rest are questions. I don't grasp the logic of "Oh, this can't be Q. He isn't telling us 'not enough'." How can he tell us anything new, if we insist that it not deviate from the past? I think somebody wants to take a ride in a time machine, "back to the Good Old Q Posts" when we were all watching a movie, and could argue about when/if the Storm would happen!