This was a comment from "BerlinWallCrosser", and I thought it was something worthwhile we should dig on. First I'd heard of it!!
Posting now because I'm headed out for the day and wanted to get some eyes on this. If true, this is MASSIVE. Berlin said we could verify the number of states - so perhaps y'all would like to pick this ball up and run with it? ;)
It's like what they did with the Vax EUA. They declared it had been "approved" even though it hadn't, and everyone just acted like it had been approved, the government, business', the military, and the people. No one called them on it. Instead of saying "you can't mandate an EUA vax," they went for exemptions.
US Secretary of State Knox officially declared it ratified (don't know if he was a banker).
It likely was not ratified, but if it were ever challenged today, a bunch of states would quickly ratify it before the case could get anywhere, and the judge would dismiss the case, saying it doesn't matter because it is ratified now.
If you want to know the truth about the income tax and 16th Amendment, you will be shocked to know that SCOTUS ruled that it did not change the Constitution, and that it is only an excise tax on engaging in federal government privileges, such as working for the government or being involved in a corporation chartered by Congress (Freddie Mac, etc.).
Read Cracking the Code:
https://files.catbox.moe/fwjqot.pdf
Where is this book from?
Today’s Clif High covers a lot.... but he mentioned that 1913 was a HUGE year for all the stuff that happened. I’d like to learn more!!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution#Ratification
"Ratification (by the requisite 36 states) was completed on February 3, 1913, with the ratification by Delaware.
The amendment was subsequently ratified by the following states, bringing the total number of ratifying states to forty-two[38] of the forty-eight then existing:
The legislatures of the following states rejected the amendment without ever subsequently ratifying it:
The legislatures of the following states never considered the proposed amendment:
Yeah, but that's from Wiki, which is not a valid source when it comes to anything of a political conspiracy nature.
There have been books written that show that some of the States did not really ratify, though it was claimed they did.
Doesn't matter really, but just pointing out that you can never rely on the DS puppets who post Wiki stuff on these types of issues.
I use wiki often first to get an overview of the "official" narrative, often I find already there clues which lead me further (and I really like the blue linked words and names which lead me to a overall picture/pattern).
Yes, you are totally right, and it was not meant as an end result, but a first step.
Slightly better? I don't know.
https://www.usconstitution.net/constamrat.html#Am16
https://www.usconstitution.net/xconst_Am16.html
Can't research? Try https://www.usconstitution.net/constamrat.html#Am16 That's where Wikipedia got the information. According to you I should not trust Wikipedia when they say that the atomic weight of natural bismuth is 209 amu?
Wikipedia is handy. A lot of it is correct, and we have no reason to think otherwise of it. Some of it is curated by political activists and is a muddle of contention.
Wasn't aware that the atomic weight of natural bismuth was something of "a political conspiracy nature."
Nor are easily verified government enactments.
Can't read?
I said:
I can't help if you see political conspiracies in matters of mere documentary facts. All I know is that you haven't any evidence the official account is untrue. The official evidence is that the amendment (which I despise) was truly ratified by more than the required number of states. You don't like it? Too bad.
This is the rest of BerlinWallCrosser's comment:
1913 is also the year the Federal Reserve was founded. Since inflation is discussed it would also seem to be a fit.
1913 sure set some bad things in motion.
The Titanic Never Sank.
Submersible photography established that the hull number on the sunken ship's propellers was 401....which was the Titanic's hull number. The propellers weighed 32 tons apiece and could not have been exchanged except in dry dock. Kindly set aside these conspiracy hobby horses. They don't ride well or long.