Never read the almost 5,000 posts that began on October 28, 2017, in need of a refresher, preying on those who do or.....?
Q has many voices/personas/styles.
Trump has repeatedly confirmed current Q but, as Q always urged readers to do, learn to research and think for yourself using logic and critical analysis. Obviously, each person, especially truth seekers, are unique.
Fortunately, having a question and seeking answers is the OPPOSITE of assuming.
Hopefully helpful feedback: "So maybe you" would have reacted with less hostility if you'd noticed/understood what it means when someone lists possibilities including "or....." that ends with a question mark?
Im offering a digital snickers in hopes it inspires a return of WWG1WGA comraderie.
As I ended by original post, "best wishes : )." I meant it.
Definitely a different writing style. There were three distinct writing styles from the initial drops, but one was consistent overall. I think that may have been Rich Higgins, and he died earlier this year. We may never know. The new drops don't have the intel drop feeling like the others did so it may be fake or an entirely different writer type. Note that not one of the new drops has a link to information.
"As oblique and effectively meaningless as always".
When used diagnostically, this feedback can lead to improvement. When that happens, things can start becoming more evocative and curiosity inspjiring rather than remaining "oblique and effectively meaningless ".
If unwilling to grow, perhaps find a status quo comfy community that's a better fit like patriots dot win or breitbart. Fortunately, MAGA is a big tent.
Makes me think of Chris Yoon, who I have nothing against. I like him. He will probably read this. Updooting would make that more likely.
Chris is a Christian youtuber who often states what's going to happen and when. His prophecies and predictions are clearly based on theories he reads from anons, but he doesn't state that outright. He gets a little carried away and gets it wrong, often. It's not a good look for Q.
To Chris, or any other budding prophets. Prophecy is living word. It is not set in stone, because stones are dead. Living word stays connected to the tree of life. It does not fall to the ground. It's always in motion. Always changing; becoming. X will happen on Y date is not prophecy.
That said, Q or fake Q is wrong here. Some of you are prophets. The rest of you should ask to become prophets. "Follow after charity, and desire spiritual gifts, but rather that ye may prophesy."
Yes, i know Q is a team but this doesn't sound like Q at all.
The new ones just don't.
cause its not
You don’t know, so stop pretending like you do.
Then its time to pack up shop because then everything falls into questionable territory with every post then
"This doesn't sound like Q".
Never read the almost 5,000 posts that began on October 28, 2017, in need of a refresher, preying on those who do or.....?
Q has many voices/personas/styles.
Trump has repeatedly confirmed current Q but, as Q always urged readers to do, learn to research and think for yourself using logic and critical analysis. Obviously, each person, especially truth seekers, are unique.
Best wishes : ).
Been with Q since the start and read them more times than I can count, so maybe you shouldn't assume.
"So maybe you shouldnt assume".
Fortunately, having a question and seeking answers is the OPPOSITE of assuming.
Hopefully helpful feedback: "So maybe you" would have reacted with less hostility if you'd noticed/understood what it means when someone lists possibilities including "or....." that ends with a question mark?
Im offering a digital snickers in hopes it inspires a return of WWG1WGA comraderie.
As I ended by original post, "best wishes : )." I meant it.
Definitely a different writing style. There were three distinct writing styles from the initial drops, but one was consistent overall. I think that may have been Rich Higgins, and he died earlier this year. We may never know. The new drops don't have the intel drop feeling like the others did so it may be fake or an entirely different writer type. Note that not one of the new drops has a link to information.
for a "cult leader" he sure is terrible at it
"As oblique and effectively meaningless as always".
When used diagnostically, this feedback can lead to improvement. When that happens, things can start becoming more evocative and curiosity inspjiring rather than remaining "oblique and effectively meaningless ".
If unwilling to grow, perhaps find a status quo comfy community that's a better fit like patriots dot win or breitbart. Fortunately, MAGA is a big tent.
What is a "Q sychophant"? An iteration of Trump cultist?
Fortunately, "its useless" to you =/= "Its useless".
Again, useless to you. ... only?
Elon? Praying Poophead? Kanye? DeSantis? Tim Poole?
Makes me think of Chris Yoon, who I have nothing against. I like him. He will probably read this. Updooting would make that more likely.
Chris is a Christian youtuber who often states what's going to happen and when. His prophecies and predictions are clearly based on theories he reads from anons, but he doesn't state that outright. He gets a little carried away and gets it wrong, often. It's not a good look for Q.
To Chris, or any other budding prophets. Prophecy is living word. It is not set in stone, because stones are dead. Living word stays connected to the tree of life. It does not fall to the ground. It's always in motion. Always changing; becoming. X will happen on Y date is not prophecy.
That said, Q or fake Q is wrong here. Some of you are prophets. The rest of you should ask to become prophets. "Follow after charity, and desire spiritual gifts, but rather that ye may prophesy."
Doesn't it depend on what definition of "prophet" Q intends? Perhaps your definition =/= Qs definition?
As Q reminded readers "multiple meanings exist". Q also encouraged readers to "expand your thinking".
So many false prophets. Jesus is Truth.