If you consider yourself 'Awakened', you should be familiar with this pending SCOTUS case.
(americanmediaperiscope.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (137)
sorted by:
Thanks for the article. I've been scouring around, trying to follow this. This was the best part of the article:
Vote in Favor
If the Justices vote in favor of the petition:
Will the U.S. Marshals and Secret Service remove the 388 members? If removed, will they be replaced by qualified U.S. military officers to carry on the business of the United States of America in continuity-of-government maneuver? Will the removed members be indicted and tried for treason or a lesser offense? Will both the 2020 and 2022 elections be disqualified and replaced with a secure election at some point in 2023?
This could explain SO MUCH!
<passes hopium>
PS do you have any idea when this is going to be heard? I can't find it on Scotus calendar.
US Marshals are in the DOJ under the AG. Not gonna do anything regardless of how the court rules. Secret Service is in Homeland Security under Mayorkas. Again, nothing. The military is the only way. I doubt an obscure case will be the trigger, but let's see.
Retired military officer here. I will gladly come out of retirement to restore true justice to our country.
Thank you for your service. You may be needed one day to serve again.
Our family as well.
Good points. Let's see what happens. Roe v Wade gave me so much hope, I'm sure that anything can happen now!
I agree that an obscure case from seemingly out of nowhere could be the trigger... but then again, Hunter's laptop came from an Apple repair shop owner. Perhaps prescribing obscurity to massive "wins" is a move on the chessboard.
Judging by the current state of our military, not so sure this is the answer everyone has been hoping for. Basically the command structure are complete political woke hacks and the based rank and file have been mostly purged. Those that remain have demonstrated that they will follow illegal orders to keep their jobs and the command has done nothing to protect these soldiers. This was deliberate and done as a means to remove the military option off the table.
Or it's an unintended consequence of putting so much energy into the Invasion of Iraq and now for 20 years multiple generations of young people have seen thousands of fellow youths die for oil companies and Dick Cheney's PMC friends, all while never finding the promised and obviously false reason for the invasion in the first place... And yet the ongoing loss continues.
Yes, those things have contributed to the downturn in recruitment. But, those things you mention speak more to forces outside of the actual military itself - the complex of government and private industry that use our military to achieve political and commercial benefit. What I am talking about is the condition within our military itself. It has been a slow and deliberate destruction of the rank and file soldier which leaves us extremely vulnerable. The constant repetition of the mantra that the military is our only answer does not seriously consider the consequences of that reality. Military takeovers are never good for the people - especially when that military is compromised to the state that ours is.
Garland, and Mayorkas were appointments by an illegal regime, they would not have any legal authority over the DOJ and DHS. They would lose their power. This is a massive house of cards that will be coming down.
They haven't granted the petition yet - https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-380.html , not sure what the timeline looks like for that.
Oh yes, that makes sense, thank you for that. Let me rephrase - how do you think we can find out when they will do the process of granting the petition?
I'm both embarrassed and amazed that I don't understand this process.
Spoiler alert - they are not granting the petition.
Yeah I'm not too sure, looking at their case distribution schedule page, I think they may decide in early December perhaps? https://www.supremecourt.gov/casedistribution/casedistributionschedule.aspx
Thank you, fren, now isn't all of this VERY INTERESTING!
It’s not going to be heard. SCOTUS (unlike most appellate courts) has almost complete discretion as to what cases it hears and it doesn’t - it will deny cert on this case. Not dooming, just a lawfag.
I agree lawfag here too. Anyone can file. The government lawyers waived responding because they know it will be denied.
Probably depends on what dirt the cabal has on the justices and how much real integrity they have. These are not dumb people. They know out politicians have been taken over by foreign actors. I’m still trying to decide if the early “roe vs wade” vote was integrity or just ammo for the Democrats to use for midterms.
Could you give a lowly normfag the ELI5 on what this case is even about?
And what makes it obvious that SCOTUS will decline?
Thanks for helping us put this in context, fren.
Juan o savin talked about this today with Micheal Jaco. It's a pretty good watch.
https://rumble.com/v1xce96-juan-o-savin-lays-out-the-plan-for-return-of-cic-trump-and-scotus-treason-c.html
This is the part I needed clarification on and the article helped somewhat: