Chiang Kai-shek was a Chinese nationalist and leader of the Republic of China from 1928 until his death in 1975.
He fought a civil war against the members of the Chinese Communist Party from 1928-1946, before he was driven out of mainland China. The Republic of China controls Taiwan to this day.
Chiang Kai-shek may or may not have been a CIA sock puppet, but he had absolutely nothing to do with Vietnam.
What they probably took issue with is that the question presupposes that JA is a journalist. It's a debate in which one side claims that publishing anything that falls into your lap, without taking into consideration negative effects, like doxing people, isn't "journalism".
That's a very fair question and politely put. There's nothing which needed to be removed.
I guess the problem is that it implies that the Democrats have polar opposite double standards and therefore no integrity.
You nailed it.
Can a Democrat win by playing by the rules? Ever?
The answer is no.
OP is incorrect. The Democrats were never anti-war. It’s just a cloak they wore while trying to undermine the USA’s fight against communism.
Chiang Kai-shek was a Chinese nationalist and leader of the Republic of China from 1928 until his death in 1975.
He fought a civil war against the members of the Chinese Communist Party from 1928-1946, before he was driven out of mainland China. The Republic of China controls Taiwan to this day.
Chiang Kai-shek may or may not have been a CIA sock puppet, but he had absolutely nothing to do with Vietnam.
Thank you for the correction. That was a brain fart. I meant to say Ho Chi Minh.
Now do Mao.
Day by day and almost minute by minute, the past was brought up to date.
What they probably took issue with is that the question presupposes that JA is a journalist. It's a debate in which one side claims that publishing anything that falls into your lap, without taking into consideration negative effects, like doxing people, isn't "journalism".