The girl in this video has already released multiple videos explaining that this is a kink of hers. She likes it really rough and roleplay. And it was consensual, not abuse. This isn't new video, it came out a while ago.
I really don't care what two consenting adults choose to do in the privacy of their own bedroom. The fact that you are clearly bothered by it is more concerning.
Here is a re-up. There is also another video where they are laying in bed afterwards and she is making fun of him for not hitting her hard enough and basically calling him a bitch.
This was all over social media ages ago. 'bootyjuice' is right, the woman in the video has explained loads of times this is her 'thing'. Since some of you never go on social media, you are in a bit of a bubble as far as news is concerned.
You need to ask yourself, why is this all coming out now? If this has been going on for years, why now? Could it be about the video he put out a month ago, basically calling out Balenciaga as Satanists? Could it be the tweet where he said they tried to buy him, but couldn’t? Could it be the dust up with Greta Thurnberg, the Rothschild family member?
There is a lot going on. Let’s use discernment before passing judgement. He could be a jerk AND. On our side. We’re not gonna like everyone.
And you have to ask yourself why do you care so much about some rando like a fanatic brain washed simp? I have no idea who this schmuck is and I smell pr stunt grift material when I see one. Ignoring it and moving on to important things.
nonsense. You are making something out of this that is just not there. I get that you may be a straight up missionary but not everyone is and although its not my thing, couldn't give a shit what 2 consenting adults do. You are completely missing the point about what is going on here. If you actually knew what was going on you would have seen this on social media ages ago and the woman and him afterwards. The fact its coming out again and you are so outraged by it says you need to widen your thought process.
I’m all for busting the guilty, but blurry video doesn’t go far to prove who is perpetrating the crime. This seems deepstatish. I’m not a fan of this Tate kid and I’ve seen his macho videos and I wouldn’t doubt that something is wrong with his extreme wealth from being a mma guy (that’s it right?), but with me the jury is still out.
Ok so discernment. The white hats are not the only ones that can deep fake. Either good or bad keep this in your mind. Weigh your knowledge with who is doing the messaging. Q. Does the DS want this person to be guilty. Think character assassination. Think.
The more important thing to know is this was used years ago because UK Big Brother producers thought he needed to be removed from the house. So this sex tape got released and they used it to remove him.
Is it the same girl? The violent video doesn't give us a good idea of what she looks like. He calls her by an east european name and the female who says its consentual is obviously American.
Same girl, she made two separate videos afterward to clear Andrew's name. If you watch the extended version of the video, that goes beyond the "sexual violence" the girl is making fun of Andrew for being "weak" and not going harder on her.
Now that you know this, if you require the actual videos go look youtube/rumble (might not be on youtube). Then you have a moral obligation to Truth to undo any lies/damage you may have done in ignorance. (This is true whenever we discover the Truth, not just on this subject.).
You do not address what I said, that the original video does not show who the woman is, its biscuit tin quality.
Any moral obligations I might have are not for you to define or remind me of, and for any lies I wrote, my conscience about them is none of your business, look after your own before you try to take charge of the conscience of anyone else.
IOW anyone who disagrees with you is a utter moral scoundrel. You can't deny that the female in the first video is unidentifiable so you seethe and scream at me as i have the temerity to answer you back. Are you in love with Mr Tate?
I do care if you have an utter disregard for Truth.
Are you in love with Mr Tate?
No. I don't know Mr. Tate. I love Truth.
As far as the video is concerned. And ignoring the fact that the woman came forward TWICE to let everyone know it was consensual. Lets use some common sense. The woman is wearing lingerie in the video. The camera is centered on the action. Which happens to be on a bed.
If this was spontaneous non-consensual activity; she most likely wouldn't be wearing lingerie. There would be no camera around, let alone centered on the bed they were on.
So not only do you have no regard for Truth you're an idiot.
The girl in this video has already released multiple videos explaining that this is a kink of hers. She likes it really rough and roleplay. And it was consensual, not abuse. This isn't new video, it came out a while ago.
You're fucking sick if you can watch that video and defend his actions.
nobody needs to defend it. They both consented to it and are grown adults. End of.
Look at the dumb canuck trying to police. It's cute.
I really don't care what two consenting adults choose to do in the privacy of their own bedroom. The fact that you are clearly bothered by it is more concerning.
The world is screwed. As you will see by the replies.
Utter degeneracy in the world due to brainwashing.
LOL. Weak minded people downvote instead of reply. Nice defense of this filth. GOD would be so proud of you defending these actions.
I don’t get your angle. She wanted him to do it. Is it weird? Yeah. But I feel as though you are overreacting.
Source?
https://www.tiktok.com/@narutoz..editz_/video/7136579660007247150?is_from_webapp=v1&item_id=7136579660007247150&lang=en
Here is a re-up. There is also another video where they are laying in bed afterwards and she is making fun of him for not hitting her hard enough and basically calling him a bitch.
This was all over social media ages ago. 'bootyjuice' is right, the woman in the video has explained loads of times this is her 'thing'. Since some of you never go on social media, you are in a bit of a bubble as far as news is concerned.
Why doesn’t this surprise me?
You need to ask yourself, why is this all coming out now? If this has been going on for years, why now? Could it be about the video he put out a month ago, basically calling out Balenciaga as Satanists? Could it be the tweet where he said they tried to buy him, but couldn’t? Could it be the dust up with Greta Thurnberg, the Rothschild family member?
There is a lot going on. Let’s use discernment before passing judgement. He could be a jerk AND. On our side. We’re not gonna like everyone.
And you have to ask yourself why do you care so much about some rando like a fanatic brain washed simp? I have no idea who this schmuck is and I smell pr stunt grift material when I see one. Ignoring it and moving on to important things.
Tate is controlled. His father was CIA. This is them using assets to change the narrative. VIRGIN ISLANDS SUED JP MORGAN!!!
I'm not a Tate fan but in light of all the fake news being pushed I will wait until more information is put forth before I jump on a story like this.
What a douche bag Tate is.
Apparently the woman in the video eventually came out to say it was a weird consensual act.
Apparently you're gullible. Like battered wife syndrome... they will defend their abuser. This is how you mentally BREAK someone.
nonsense. You are making something out of this that is just not there. I get that you may be a straight up missionary but not everyone is and although its not my thing, couldn't give a shit what 2 consenting adults do. You are completely missing the point about what is going on here. If you actually knew what was going on you would have seen this on social media ages ago and the woman and him afterwards. The fact its coming out again and you are so outraged by it says you need to widen your thought process.
Source?
Listed above.
Wow these people (Tate and Carlson for supporting him) are sick.
And there's the other side of the story.
Was that 1990s phone cam? Blurry videos always make me skeptical.
Yeah, so normal. I'm sure we all have grainy videos where we appear to be beating women but it's just the POTATO Camera right? You're sick.
you are emotionally over reacting to something that is 2 consenting adults. Relax your gums, there is more important things to be angry about.
I’m all for busting the guilty, but blurry video doesn’t go far to prove who is perpetrating the crime. This seems deepstatish. I’m not a fan of this Tate kid and I’ve seen his macho videos and I wouldn’t doubt that something is wrong with his extreme wealth from being a mma guy (that’s it right?), but with me the jury is still out.
Pretty sure Tucker didn’t know about all this. But yes, Tate is scum.
Just about everybody knew about this ages ago and nobody gives a shit because its consensual.
How do you know it was consensual?
It's called... the internet.
Andrew Tate’s Ex Speaks Out About Abuse Allegations
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/nfSCIVAcXOU
Snark isn’t needed. I was asking a legit question.
I don't even care if she asked him to do it. If he had any character he would say no not a chance in hell am I abusing a woman.
Deep state putting out a hit on Andrew Tate. Why now, and what is this a distraction from?
Distraction from Epstein’s client list for starters. Jan 6 dropping arrest for trump. Brunson case.
Seems this is a move to get George Tekai’s panties all bunched up.
Huge rush to jump to conclusions with this; the rush to do so is pretty sad based on everything you've been lied to about literally everything.
Let’s give it the 72 hour rules for once. I don’t follow him but I’m nit sad he’s preaching masculinity to young men god knows they need it
His last sentence of this video is all you need to know about whoever this guy is.
Ok so discernment. The white hats are not the only ones that can deep fake. Either good or bad keep this in your mind. Weigh your knowledge with who is doing the messaging. Q. Does the DS want this person to be guilty. Think character assassination. Think.
No. TATE is already a CIA Operative. They just use them when they want to distract you. ie. VIRGIN ISLANDS JUST SUED JP MORGAN.
The more important thing to know is this was used years ago because UK Big Brother producers thought he needed to be removed from the house. So this sex tape got released and they used it to remove him.
Proof this is Tate?
Both Tate and the girl admit it was them, in consensual activity. She has posted at least two videos stating she asked Tate to do this.
Is it the same girl? The violent video doesn't give us a good idea of what she looks like. He calls her by an east european name and the female who says its consentual is obviously American.
Same girl, she made two separate videos afterward to clear Andrew's name. If you watch the extended version of the video, that goes beyond the "sexual violence" the girl is making fun of Andrew for being "weak" and not going harder on her.
Now that you know this, if you require the actual videos go look youtube/rumble (might not be on youtube). Then you have a moral obligation to Truth to undo any lies/damage you may have done in ignorance. (This is true whenever we discover the Truth, not just on this subject.).
You do not address what I said, that the original video does not show who the woman is, its biscuit tin quality.
Any moral obligations I might have are not for you to define or remind me of, and for any lies I wrote, my conscience about them is none of your business, look after your own before you try to take charge of the conscience of anyone else.
IOW anyone who disagrees with you is a utter moral scoundrel. You can't deny that the female in the first video is unidentifiable so you seethe and scream at me as i have the temerity to answer you back. Are you in love with Mr Tate?
I don't care if you disagree with me.
I do care if you have an utter disregard for Truth.
No. I don't know Mr. Tate. I love Truth.
As far as the video is concerned. And ignoring the fact that the woman came forward TWICE to let everyone know it was consensual. Lets use some common sense. The woman is wearing lingerie in the video. The camera is centered on the action. Which happens to be on a bed.
If this was spontaneous non-consensual activity; she most likely wouldn't be wearing lingerie. There would be no camera around, let alone centered on the bed they were on.
So not only do you have no regard for Truth you're an idiot.
Movie…Psy-Op…War…🤔
For the record I am not an Own Benjamin fan
I posted this earlier.
Not a fan of Owen either but I like him waaaay more than Tate.
Tate is a toxic motherfucker, straight up down.
It is all one big f*cking psyop..I hate this ride..I want to get off.
Be strong fren
https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZDqYUprY/weve-all-heard-it-before-but-mos/c/
That's a shame.