I did some searches of this case to begin on Jan 6th, 2023 on Brave, etc and it was pretty much useless... These are the key results I found on Yandex.com.
Loy Brunson is a Constitutional scholar and one of 4 Brunson brothers. Members of Congress do not have the broad immunity that many of them think they do. The destruction of this concept of Congressional immunity may soon play a huge role as the Supreme Court starts hearing the case Jan 6, 2023 (www.bitchute.com)
SCOTUS Brunson v Adams 22-380 Case- Impeachment of members of Congress not required as Court has power to remove all 388 Defendants from holding office if found guilty under charges of Treason due to violation of their oath by not investigating the claims of election fraud and adhering to the enemy! (https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZqPSMuev/scotus-brunson-v-adams-22380-cas/c/ )
Brunson Bros. drain the swamp
ralandbrunson.com The first One, filed by Loy Brunson is still held up in the Utah Federal Court. The second one, filed by Raland J. Brunson has made it to the Supreme Court of the United...
Is this the Supreme Court case that will... - American Thinker
americanthinker.com›blog/2022…this…supreme_court… —Question of Law in the Supreme Court case known as Brunson v. Alma S. Adams; et al. (Biden, Harris, Pence & 385 Members of Congress). They Broke Their Oaths.
WILL SCOTUS TAKE THIS ON? The Four Brunson Brothers...
thegatewaypundit.com›2022…will-scotus…brunson…385… According to the complaint, Brunson v. Alma; et al (Docket #22-380), the defendants, Biden, Harris, Pence ... The Brunsons are now appealing the case to the Supreme Court.
BRUNSON v. STATE | FindLaw | Supreme Court of Georgia.
caselaw.findlaw.com›ga-supreme-court/1634985.html Case opinion for GA Supreme Court BRUNSON v. STATE. ... 2. Brunson contends that the trial court should have instructed the jury on the affirmative defense of self-defense.
What I hope all patriots get from this is that when someone swears an oath to the Constitution, it's a big deal. And that person is expected to keep their oath, and if they choose not to, they have effectively 'vacated' their seat and need to go. If they don't go on their own, their constituents can have them removed.
It's been so long since these people have been held accountable that it's like nobody (citizens) even knows they are supposed to be and can be held accountable. It's not just for something as big as investigating an election. It's for any violation of their oath. How many current local, state, and federal politicians, LE, etc. would even still be in office if their constituents held them accountable? The constitution provides a way for so many things to be dealt with, but the people (the ones in 'we the people') need to know their Constitution so they can hold them accountable.
Too Iong have we expected the police to police when the power is with the people. To think the foundingfathers would have had it any other way is to be ignorant of the founding tenets that America was built upon.
What the people need now is to set the precedent with a great example of an infringement on the rights of a public servant's constituents or dereliction of duty. Sounds awfully like a certain event that happened at the capital. Rhymes with Ban You Carry Tricks.
Dude, we are patient but not that patient, kek.
Oop's let me edit that... LOL
This isn't a hearing of the case. It's a hearing to decide if the case will be heard. It probably won't be.
Nino Rodriguez on Rumble interview with Loy Brunson. Explosive! What could actually happen! https://rumble.com/v22vbrw-juan-o-savin-with-david-nino-rodriguez.html
Remember; SCOTUS has the power to adjudicate this case! That means if SCOTUS rules on this case, they have the power to remove these 388 congress, senate members along with Biden, Harris & Pence from office! Never to hold political office again! Due to their breach of oath.
Breach of oath on Jan 6 2021 to NOT send the electoral votes back to the states knowing there was election fraud reported from DNI Radcliff from 2020 presidential election! There is precedence on their responsibility as it was a matter of Nat'l Security to do so. Failed to protect America from foreign & domestic election interference.
So now, it is all falling into place - here is what we have;
SCOTUS rules Trump's tax returns released to the public. This sets a precedence to have ALL congressional members in both house & senate to have their tax returns made public (audited). As well as Biden, Harris & Pence.
In bloated Omnibus Bill that was just passed, in that bill was written in that VPOTUS presiding over Senate/House electoral votes 'DOES NOT' have the power to decide whether electoral votes go back to state for decertification.' (so, in essence Pence DID HAVE this VPOTUS power on sending back the votes).
BRUNSON v ALMA/STATE CASE - SCOTUS could rule to remove these 388 members including PENCE, BIDEN & HARRIS from office for breach of oath in their sworn obligation to WE, the PEOPLE to protect us from foreign & domestic election interference. By not doing so, it was an ACT of WAR. (Removal by US Marshals, Secret Service, Military, etc.) This is a civil case, but would lead to criminal with investigations, audits, money laundering, conspiracies to commit election fraud with foreign & domestic entities. (RICO cases)
TRUMP did not concede, he was not de-briefed, etc. therefore there is no need for him to be sworn in again. He simply just resumes office. (A ceremonial event like an inauguration to be held on the original March 4th date.He appoints a new VPOTUS and assists with continuity of gov't in filling all those vacant house/senate members in congress. Special elections, appointments, etc. (Remember back in August 2022 Trump posted; 'reinstate me as POTUS or hold a new election. IMO this was his 'warning' to the Deep State of things to come!'
BE AWARE OF DEEP STATE FALSE FLAGS DURING THIS TRANSITION PERIOD!
Members of fake MSM, Social Media, Corporations, Big Pharma, Medical, Banking involved in the RICO case as well...
Recall 25+ years ago when Biden presided over senate during now Justice Thomas' SCOTUS appointment. Thomas has been a very patient man (player) and will inflict PAIN on Biden (removal from office). V = Vendetta (or Victory!)
They're going to take a hard pass. That there are people here who do not get this is frankly astounding.
I wish. The realistic in me says no BUT I still have hope as after all, Roe v Wade was overturned.
Thank you. I have hope too. I’ve read the entire case - I’m a retired school teacher, not a lawyer - But boy, today the discussion seems so negative. I also hope it isn’t a huge let down. We’ve had so many…We need a ‘in your face’ WIN! Maybe it will wake more people up!
Agree...nurse here wanting to work 4 more years as the future seems uncertain. Education system has gotten crazy also and no easy fix there either.
Exactly. I retired 12 years ago. I had planned to work another 5 or 6 but I just could not do it. It had changed so much. Hope you get your 4 more years in. I had a good friend years ago who was a nurse. I admire you for what you do. Thank you.
Seems a simple and effective REMEDY.
The oath thing is a big deal. I didn’t have an opportunity for military service but am in the fire service. We’ve been having issues with department members keeping their commitments including some of the volunteer officers.
In one of the conversations I brought up that we all took an oath that may result in our death depending on actions required to protect others. I don’t remember the exact words but one of the captains whined back that he adheres to the oath ‘when he’s on duty’ and not otherwise.
I was so surprised I didn’t have a calm response and gritted teeth to keep from saying something disrespectful. And no one else jumped into the debate.
My understanding is that on Jan 6th the court is ONLY deciding whether to move forward on this case. NOT to officially take up the case.
Check this video of a constitutional law expert explaining the complaint filed in the Brunson case in detail:
https://rumble.com/v235yf8-constitutional-law-part-ii-the-brunson-brothers-lawsuit-before-the-supreme-.html
Also, read this article from a professor teaching constitutional law:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/tim-canova-supreme-court-considers-case-seeking-overturn-2020-presidential-election/
I've been around the block enough time to know exactly what is going to happen....
If it happens this way, it was all a waste. It's not going to happen this way. How long would it take to refill the swap with new scumbags? If it happens this way, then nothing at all will change.
I feel like suddenly the case will just get dismissed like Kerry Lakes did. Gavel, dismissed blah, blah, blah. Reminds me of the Trump announcements and alll the hype. Hmm, we will see.
And just like that an article dooms you.
Wow.
I disagree. The fact that the Brandon administration didn’t file a brief in response shows that they’ve already given up. This is going all the way.
Case denied.
The court is not going to save America.
Not filing a brief doesn’t mean that they think they have a weak case. It means that they agree with the arguments already briefed in the lower courts about why this case should be dismissed, and which the lower courts accepted.
There is nothing for the administration to file a brief about unless the court grants cert so that the case is being argued on the merits.
This post here at the Great Awakening has a sober second look at this matter https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZqPbRnN9/-the-truth-about-the-brunson-cas/c/
I asked a question on that posting but maybe others on this post can also answer. With all the cases they turn away, why even agree to look at this one if they have no standing to rule on it? There are so many “constitutional experts” on both sides of this issue that, frankly, I’m just confused. Some say they have that power and some say not. I’m just an accountant trying to understand.
I think people who are opposing this case are looking at it from purely procedural point of view and this is not how Supreme Court does things.
I am looking at this case from national importance point of view.
https://rumble.com/v235yf8-constitutional-law-part-ii-the-brunson-brothers-lawsuit-before-the-supreme-.html
As per allegations in the complaint (which is being explained in this above video), there are 31 states that have violated election laws. I don't think there is any other Court which can decide this issue other than SCOTUS?
The people opposing this case may be right that based on past history, SCOTUS will not get involved in this case. But my point is that if they want to get involved, they have full authority and jurisdiction to take action in this case!
Let's see what happens!
They haven’t looked at this one yet. It’s on the docket, but that just means that Brunson filled out the right paperwork and mailed it to the right address.
The Jan 6 conference is when they look at it, decide whether they have jurisdiction (not “standing” - that’s something completely different that plaintiffs must show), and decide whether this one will be another of the vast number of cases that are turned away.
"This column isn’t going to earn anyone money—to the contrary—many of you will likely hate us for writing it. But the truth is the truth".
A wise man once said anything before "BUT" is BS.
Agreed.
Id add, if the Juano/Nino/McKay/Ward/Parkes circle is promoting it then it's most likely going to amount to nothing substantial.
What would say George Washington respond to that?
I think you've nailed it...
The Hobbit Frodo Baggins feels all but overwhelmed by the enormity of the task ahead of him and tells the wizard Gandalf,
“I wish it need not have happened in my time.”
“So do I,” replies Gandalf. “And so do all who live to see such times. But it is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us.”
Happy New Year, to all dear friends and fellow travellers.