https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnlamattina/2018/06/28/the-biopharmaceutical-industry-provides-75-of-the-fdas-drug-review-budget-is-this-a-problem/?sh=5050ad1249ec

I've said this before - we have no idea how much damage Bill Clinton did to the health care industry while everyone was focused on Hillary trying to push socialized medicine. But that's when things started changing for the worse at a rapid pace.

Look at this graph!

Good info for everyone to know.

The problem is that taxpayers should be providing 100% of the FDA's budget along with 100% of the CDC's and NIH's budgets. That is providing that all three organizations are on the up and up. Of course that last sentence is about as truthful as the overall fake news.

Is that the dude from Nickleback?

Hugely!

Original article?

https://archive.md/h3O5m

https://web.archive.org/web/20221217234328/https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnlamattina/2018/06/28/the-biopharmaceutical-industry-provides-75-of-the-fdas-drug-review-budget-is-this-a-problem/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnlamattina/2018/06/28/the-biopharmaceutical-industry-provides-75-of-the-fdas-drug-review-budget-is-this-a-problem/

75% smells like a Conflict of Interest

What is a "Conflict of Interest"?

For those not familiar with a conflict of interest (COI). A conflict of interest is a set of conditions in which professional judgment concerning a PRIMARY interest tends to be unduly influenced by a SECONDARY interest. For example, if the PRIMARY interest is the welfare of you the citizens or the validity of research. But this PRIMARY interest is unduly influenced by a SECONDARY interest about financial gain of pharmaceutical companies. Then there is a conflict of interest. Which is bad. Because there is a risk that financial gain is put above your safety.