The Bible doesn’t say the earth is a dome either. The firmament being a solid canopy is a modern invention.
Where the Bible is silent, reason and scientific evidence must be used, and all of it points to a spherical earth. The best explanation for the firmament, then, is that it is the solid crust of the earth. This crust used to be connected all the way around the earth and had an ocean of water trapped underneath it. Genesis records that God called the firmament “heaven” because Earth was supposed to be heaven, the place where God dwelled with men. And one day it will be that way again.
During the Flood, this crust ruptured, allowing the “fountains of the deep” to break out and cover the earth in water.
There’s a difference between Big Science and actual scientific evidence. Scientific evidence and reason point both to the earth being a sphere and to the Covid “vaccines” being death jabs.
My problem with flat earthers is not that they inherently distrust institutions, it’s that their distrust is the only argument they have. If you want to propose an alternative model for how the world works, it has to be based in observational data and backed by reason. Every single flat earth argument and model falls apart under scrutiny. The evidence for the death jabs remains solid and plausible under scrutiny.
NASA isn’t right just because they’re right; they’re right because no one has proposed a better model that better explains the data.
Just have one Question...WHY does NASA Lie??.... You talk about 'flat-earthers' distrust in "institutions"...
Do you believe and 'trust' these professionals who are supposedly in a gravity-free environment dropping things?... I Don't...and my opinion is based on what I see and hear and then using logic, critical thinking and common sense... This is just one of many Cons...Whether one believes the Earth is a globe or Flat...
https://www.bitchute.com/video/2PVo7dZ36pLN/
NASA lie because if they have told us the truth.. how the heck would they be able to control us? Just by saying earth is flat means there is a higher intelligence design, a God, a creation, that we didn't come from monkeys, we didn't just randomly appear from evolution or big bang theory.
Telling us the truth means govt would have no power because as humanity we would ONLY answer to God, and not govt.
If people know there are more land beyond the wall, people would migrate there, venture out. That's why no matter how much all countries disagree and at war w/ one another, there is ONE thing they agree to..KEEP OUT OF ANTARTICA. You can go jail for life just by trespassing there. That is how precious Antartica is to DEM(ons)
The only things NASA has been lying about have to do with "climate change," which has very little to do with actual science, and everything to do with politics. But in that case, it is possible to find the actual data and prove their lies.
Their statements on matters relating to space, aeronautics, and planetary exploration are sound. Objections and questions are invariably based on ignorance and misunderstanding. Re the video: (1) The "falling" ring. What happened was obscured by the astronaut's hand. Nothing falling was "seen." As anyone who has dealt with a small implement knows, it doesn't take much of a fumble to flick it out of position. Other items were truly floating around, however. (2) The "falling" clip. Another fumble; you could see his right hand tripping it. (3) The "dropped" globe. It was squeezed away between the astronaut's arm and his thigh. Constant velocity, not accelerating. (4) International Space Station a hoax? Funny that such a hoax can be seen traveling overhead in the night sky. Or that there is no problem finding a profusion of images and videos of it. Plenty of people have traveled to it and come back.
This video is a prime example of ignorance and snark running riot. The compiler only knows what he wants to see and edits out the reality (floating objects). This is a world view that WANTS to be lied to, for the satisfaction of some perverse itch, so it goes looking for lies and makes lies out of truth. My opinion is based on having been in this industry for 40 years, and being able to sort fact from fiction.
So they'll lie about the jab but not space/the shape of earth? How does that stupidity compute in your head? Killing kids in the name of science is fine? But the shape of earth and space is the line you think they won't cross. You aren't as smart as you as trying to be. The argument that "nasa must be right because Noone has proposed better" is a flat out lie and fallacy.
We know they lied about the jab. We caught them red handed changing the definition of vaccines, and their claims that the jab protects against Covid have been demonstrated to be false. Every attempt to prove that the earth is flat, on the other hand, has fallen flat on its face.
Also, we know that there was a motive to lie about covid and the jabs; Big Pharma made billions. What benefit is gained from lying about the shape of the earth?
And no, my final argument is not invalid. If you want to propose an alternate explanation for the nature of the universe, the onus is on you to show that your proposal coincides with reality. The theory that best explains the available evidence wins until new evidence is discovered. Screaming that NASA was founded by Freemasons isn’t a good counter argument.
No, I am not. I am a Young Earth Creationist. Evolution is a theory without a mechanism, and the evidence against it grows stronger every day. If you want to learn more, the first half of this free online book outlines the problems with evolution and shows how the evidence points toward creation:
I've listened to both sides all along, but have never been on board with Darwinism. Its arguments are falling apart from the inside, even though we don't often hear about it. If you want to hear what seems to be the cutting edge of biological science, listen to Michael Levin, for example https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLiHLDrOTW8&t=36s. Mind blown to smithereens. The universe is electric. And we're part of the universe.
Science did not give us the COVID vaccine. That's why all of the rational people distrusted it. If science gave us the COVID vaccine, it's much more likely it would be popular.
Aha. Anti-scientist bigotry. First, there is the collectivist assumption that ALL scientists are identically alike in their moral and intellectual qualities. Then there is the logical conclusion that collective guilt is both necessary and defensible. It couldn't be more tidy if all the scientists were Jews, could it?
Not the same bunch that gave us the COVID vaccine. Big difference between geography and astronomy vs. germ warfare research.
The Bible doesn’t say the earth is a dome either. The firmament being a solid canopy is a modern invention.
Where the Bible is silent, reason and scientific evidence must be used, and all of it points to a spherical earth. The best explanation for the firmament, then, is that it is the solid crust of the earth. This crust used to be connected all the way around the earth and had an ocean of water trapped underneath it. Genesis records that God called the firmament “heaven” because Earth was supposed to be heaven, the place where God dwelled with men. And one day it will be that way again.
During the Flood, this crust ruptured, allowing the “fountains of the deep” to break out and cover the earth in water.
👌
There’s a difference between Big Science and actual scientific evidence. Scientific evidence and reason point both to the earth being a sphere and to the Covid “vaccines” being death jabs.
My problem with flat earthers is not that they inherently distrust institutions, it’s that their distrust is the only argument they have. If you want to propose an alternative model for how the world works, it has to be based in observational data and backed by reason. Every single flat earth argument and model falls apart under scrutiny. The evidence for the death jabs remains solid and plausible under scrutiny.
NASA isn’t right just because they’re right; they’re right because no one has proposed a better model that better explains the data.
Just have one Question...WHY does NASA Lie??.... You talk about 'flat-earthers' distrust in "institutions"... Do you believe and 'trust' these professionals who are supposedly in a gravity-free environment dropping things?... I Don't...and my opinion is based on what I see and hear and then using logic, critical thinking and common sense... This is just one of many Cons...Whether one believes the Earth is a globe or Flat... https://www.bitchute.com/video/2PVo7dZ36pLN/
They lie to conceal the truth, of course!
Exactly what that truth is, well that's up for debate.
NASA lie because if they have told us the truth.. how the heck would they be able to control us? Just by saying earth is flat means there is a higher intelligence design, a God, a creation, that we didn't come from monkeys, we didn't just randomly appear from evolution or big bang theory.
Telling us the truth means govt would have no power because as humanity we would ONLY answer to God, and not govt.
If people know there are more land beyond the wall, people would migrate there, venture out. That's why no matter how much all countries disagree and at war w/ one another, there is ONE thing they agree to..KEEP OUT OF ANTARTICA. You can go jail for life just by trespassing there. That is how precious Antartica is to DEM(ons)
The only things NASA has been lying about have to do with "climate change," which has very little to do with actual science, and everything to do with politics. But in that case, it is possible to find the actual data and prove their lies.
Their statements on matters relating to space, aeronautics, and planetary exploration are sound. Objections and questions are invariably based on ignorance and misunderstanding. Re the video: (1) The "falling" ring. What happened was obscured by the astronaut's hand. Nothing falling was "seen." As anyone who has dealt with a small implement knows, it doesn't take much of a fumble to flick it out of position. Other items were truly floating around, however. (2) The "falling" clip. Another fumble; you could see his right hand tripping it. (3) The "dropped" globe. It was squeezed away between the astronaut's arm and his thigh. Constant velocity, not accelerating. (4) International Space Station a hoax? Funny that such a hoax can be seen traveling overhead in the night sky. Or that there is no problem finding a profusion of images and videos of it. Plenty of people have traveled to it and come back.
This video is a prime example of ignorance and snark running riot. The compiler only knows what he wants to see and edits out the reality (floating objects). This is a world view that WANTS to be lied to, for the satisfaction of some perverse itch, so it goes looking for lies and makes lies out of truth. My opinion is based on having been in this industry for 40 years, and being able to sort fact from fiction.
So they'll lie about the jab but not space/the shape of earth? How does that stupidity compute in your head? Killing kids in the name of science is fine? But the shape of earth and space is the line you think they won't cross. You aren't as smart as you as trying to be. The argument that "nasa must be right because Noone has proposed better" is a flat out lie and fallacy.
Sail straight west, without veering and eventually you will end up where you started. This is not possible on a flat plane.
We know they lied about the jab. We caught them red handed changing the definition of vaccines, and their claims that the jab protects against Covid have been demonstrated to be false. Every attempt to prove that the earth is flat, on the other hand, has fallen flat on its face.
Also, we know that there was a motive to lie about covid and the jabs; Big Pharma made billions. What benefit is gained from lying about the shape of the earth?
And no, my final argument is not invalid. If you want to propose an alternate explanation for the nature of the universe, the onus is on you to show that your proposal coincides with reality. The theory that best explains the available evidence wins until new evidence is discovered. Screaming that NASA was founded by Freemasons isn’t a good counter argument.
No, I am not. I am a Young Earth Creationist. Evolution is a theory without a mechanism, and the evidence against it grows stronger every day. If you want to learn more, the first half of this free online book outlines the problems with evolution and shows how the evidence points toward creation:
http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/PartI.html
I've listened to both sides all along, but have never been on board with Darwinism. Its arguments are falling apart from the inside, even though we don't often hear about it. If you want to hear what seems to be the cutting edge of biological science, listen to Michael Levin, for example https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLiHLDrOTW8&t=36s. Mind blown to smithereens. The universe is electric. And we're part of the universe.
If you went up to space, and saw it for yourself, you'd still call it a hoax with that attitude.
Attitude or Altitude lol
"neither has anyone else"
aka you can never be wrong despite literally all of those manned space missions
Science did not give us the COVID vaccine. That's why all of the rational people distrusted it. If science gave us the COVID vaccine, it's much more likely it would be popular.
Aha. Anti-scientist bigotry. First, there is the collectivist assumption that ALL scientists are identically alike in their moral and intellectual qualities. Then there is the logical conclusion that collective guilt is both necessary and defensible. It couldn't be more tidy if all the scientists were Jews, could it?
Not the same bunch that gave us the COVID vaccine. Big difference between geography and astronomy vs. germ warfare research.