I've studied the UFO/Abduction phenomenon for 30 years. Project Blue Beam is the hypothesis of a french author and nothing more. Unclear to me why it has become part of the consciousness, but there's nothing substantive behind it. And I would directly challenge anyone to substantiate it with anything beyond the musings of that author.
That's like trying to tell us to prove that the government would mass sacrifice thousands of people to get us into a war in the middle east on September 10th, 2001. If there's no information out there, then it cannot be proven.
He didn't ask for proof, just evidence. There's plenty of evidence for 9/11 being the government, and plenty of logical explanation to back up the idea with. The only evidence isn't hard "proof". This is the lie of modern science. Is there ANY type of proof for project blue beam outside of what the other guy said?
To be clear, I don't know a lot about the topic and don't have my mind made up either way, just pointing out that there are levels and types of evidence between "some guy said it" and "concrete, undeniable proof". It doesn't have to be 2 to convince people who aren't convinced by 1.
It is psychology. Wishful thinking will take any suggestion and elevate it to accepted fact ("Is it so? It might be so. It should be so. It must be so."). And then get offended when the reality of the fantasy is mentioned. The crowd on this site have a great need for an earthly savior, whether it is Q, White Hats, secret technology, or Aliens. It is wish-fulfillment fantasy.
I share your concern. But I advise against thinking of this as a "clown world." We are not up against ridiculous boobs; we are up against genocidal psychopaths. They are like the Joker character in Batman stories---except they do not favor fancy clothes or bizarre makeup. However, considering Rachel Levine and the now-fired Sam Brinton, the bizarre aspects are coming out for viewing. This is not funny. It is pathological, and extremely dangerous. But I don't think you disagree.
The people in control aren't clowns, but they made the world into a "clown world" to make it easier to destroy.
But I generally agree with what you say here. The people we're fighting against are very, very evil, and very competent at executing that evil. Not clowns themselves by any means.
I was talking to JackieDaytona74 about people who insist that their fantasy is real. I have no problem with the uncommitted. I am one myself (but I don't bother with fantasies). Psychology is revealed by what people say and the arguments they make. It doesn't require telepathy.
It's assuming that people who directly argue a position believe the position, and are committed. I've presented plenty of arguments I'm not fully convinced on, without making explicitly clear I'm not a full believer in the theory/idea.
Devil's advocate has value, and pushing discussion forward does as well. One need not say this is what they're doing for that to be true.
I've studied the UFO/Abduction phenomenon for 30 years. Project Blue Beam is the hypothesis of a french author and nothing more. Unclear to me why it has become part of the consciousness, but there's nothing substantive behind it. And I would directly challenge anyone to substantiate it with anything beyond the musings of that author.
That's like trying to tell us to prove that the government would mass sacrifice thousands of people to get us into a war in the middle east on September 10th, 2001. If there's no information out there, then it cannot be proven.
A study of human nature in all its forms tells us everything we need to know.
He didn't ask for proof, just evidence. There's plenty of evidence for 9/11 being the government, and plenty of logical explanation to back up the idea with. The only evidence isn't hard "proof". This is the lie of modern science. Is there ANY type of proof for project blue beam outside of what the other guy said?
To be clear, I don't know a lot about the topic and don't have my mind made up either way, just pointing out that there are levels and types of evidence between "some guy said it" and "concrete, undeniable proof". It doesn't have to be 2 to convince people who aren't convinced by 1.
It is psychology. Wishful thinking will take any suggestion and elevate it to accepted fact ("Is it so? It might be so. It should be so. It must be so."). And then get offended when the reality of the fantasy is mentioned. The crowd on this site have a great need for an earthly savior, whether it is Q, White Hats, secret technology, or Aliens. It is wish-fulfillment fantasy.
I share your concern. But I advise against thinking of this as a "clown world." We are not up against ridiculous boobs; we are up against genocidal psychopaths. They are like the Joker character in Batman stories---except they do not favor fancy clothes or bizarre makeup. However, considering Rachel Levine and the now-fired Sam Brinton, the bizarre aspects are coming out for viewing. This is not funny. It is pathological, and extremely dangerous. But I don't think you disagree.
The people in control aren't clowns, but they made the world into a "clown world" to make it easier to destroy.
But I generally agree with what you say here. The people we're fighting against are very, very evil, and very competent at executing that evil. Not clowns themselves by any means.
Plenty of people are perfectly capable of sitting comfortably at "it might be so" until further evidence is provided.
Maybe don't talk like you know people you know nothing about. Kinda ironic, in fact.
I was talking to JackieDaytona74 about people who insist that their fantasy is real. I have no problem with the uncommitted. I am one myself (but I don't bother with fantasies). Psychology is revealed by what people say and the arguments they make. It doesn't require telepathy.
It's assuming that people who directly argue a position believe the position, and are committed. I've presented plenty of arguments I'm not fully convinced on, without making explicitly clear I'm not a full believer in the theory/idea.
Devil's advocate has value, and pushing discussion forward does as well. One need not say this is what they're doing for that to be true.