The destructive power of HAARP is said to be in the generation of harmonic waves. I don't understand how it is focused, but I have read repeatedly that it can be focused anywhere in the planet, perhaps even into the ground as well as into the sky. The power of it has been likened to Tesla's "earthquake machine": https://mysteriousuniverse.org/2020/07/nikola-teslas-mysterious-earthquake-machine/ Whether or not the event attributed to this device ever happened, it is possible to develop incredible amounts of energy from a very modest standing wave. The Tacoma Bridge collapse is a prime example of this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XggxeuFDaDU
This scientist claims that HAARP can set off earthquakes with 30 watts of power. He allegedly is an expert on using these waves in geological exploration, like locating gas or oil deposits: https://www.bitchute.com/video/yFjCazNIqtDC/
I have worked on seismic crews where we used "vibe" trucks and microphone bags to locate oil. It's so neat watching the helicopter pilot relocate the bags for us. Epic skill.
OK, I'm going to spend some time going through all this in the next couple days. I need to understand the basics of this theory. There are some pretty big holes, some pretty big "leaps," here. Thanks for this!!!
We have been fed the lie that brute-force energy is the only way to get things done. Oscillation, resonance and harmonics are more powerful than they want us to know.
Like the opera singer shattering a glass. It is sustained resonant frequency causing vibration which breaks apart molecule adherence. Like Royal Rife frequency machine break apart cell walls. Like that earthquake in Turkey, collapsed building structure walls. The question we must ask is, what science is actually Science since we have basically been LIED to about everything, why would we think anything the "controllers" state is Fact is in fact FACT. I say it is mostly just Fiction and we had better start search for TRUTH in everything. GAW converts in the past 20 years think FAKE news started since 2000. It's ALL FAKE NEWS.
No. We haven't been lied to about EVERYTHING. Otherwise, you would be part of it (right?). If nothing was true, our civilization would have never formed, because we depend on truth to sustain our technology and economy. The key is to discriminate between lies and truth. And in order to doubt what you are told, YOU HAVE TO BE EDUCATED IN THE SUBJECT. I shout only to emphasize that holding up bogus conspiracy theories because one has paranoid suspicions of scientific developments is the reaction of fearful ignorance. All it takes is some know-nothing snake oil salesman to get your paranoia all keyed up over something you don't understand, be it HAARP, CERN, nuclear technology, or space travel.
to me fake news started when Kennedy was assassinated. That is where my memories go back to. Today I am so tainted by fake news that I really have a hard time trusting anything they pushed on us since then.
There’s another poppycock theory. If opera singers could shatter glass it would be a common parlor trick and there would be videos everywhere. In reality, the human vocal tract cannot generate enough energy nor focus it finely enough to shatter a glass.
Name the last singer to do it.
Brilliant, I also think that's closer to what is supposedly happening, but, you'll for sure agree that it's a LOOOONG way away from explaining "earthquakes from ionospheric energy" eh?
Yes, OK, but, just saying that shouldn't automatically preclude the emergency of a coherent, reasonably explainable theory of what exactly is happening, is my point.
Anyway, I'm late to the party (night shift time zone) but I'll add my 2 cents worth.
An earthquake releases stored energy. It can be triggered by a simple stream of water that lubricates two underground rock faces. There was a big hoohah in the UK about this when fracking triggered a small earthquake in the Midlands area.
The amount of energy required to trigger an earthquake therefore can be tiny.
Exactly how the HAARP antenna array could trigger an earthquake - only those involved in the projects know. I can't guess.
The HAARP antenna array certainly has the "steering" capability: the antenna phases can be altered to focus energy anywhere within visual range.
The original Russian "woodpecker" used pulsed radio frequency to achieve whatever it was designed for. (Top secret but probably weather modification.) By using line-of-sight microwave frequencies, the possibility of picking up the transmissions on an ordinary radio receiver (as per "woodpecker") is eliminated. Detection of microwave transmissions (afaik) is possible only within the beam.
Earthquakes are often preceded by "lights in the sky". I don't know when this was first observed but it's well documented. Microwave pulses aimed at the ionosphere could certainly ionise the air and produce "lights".
Don't be confused by the term "electromagnetic". Think of a microwave oven. It focuses a microwave energy beam on the turntable. If the beam is very narrow, it can be effective over a great distance (think "laser"). The HAARP array extends over a large area; the greater the width, the narrower the focus. (Think satellite TV dish.)
I'm an electronics engineer - think OLD - experienced (and modest, too!). I've dealt with high frequency equipment. Microwave energy reflects off surfaces. It can reflect off atmospheric layers. I can certainly believe that technology exists, which could trigger an earthquake. I was a teenager when I listened to the "woodpecker" on my vacuum tube radio. The Russians, Chinese and Americans have had six decades to work on this technology.
The idea of resonance should not be dismissed. If a powerful energy beam is pulsed at the Schumann frequency and aimed (or reflected) at the Earth, I can imagine that bad things could happen. It might be worth looking at this page when an earthquake occurs:
https://in5d.com/todays-live-schumann-resonance-charts-and-resources/
I just bought "Angels don't play this HAARP - Advances in Tesla Technology".
(You can get a free PDF copy if you know where to look.)
Be aware of the patent pushers. There are many patents related to HAARP and every other fantastic scheme. I had a friend who patented a means for gathering energy from black holes. Having a patent doesn't mean it works or exists, but it's a favorite "proof."
"Be[ing] aware of patent pushers," suggests that a patent existing for something is "not good evidence." On the contrary, it is excellent evidence. Getting a U.S. patent is not easy. If you successfully get a patent, it suggests that it is at least plausible within the context of sound principles of engineering.
I agree that such "excellent evidence" is not sufficient evidence to meet the burden of proof of "beyond a reasonable doubt" for something working or existing, but that doesn't make it not excellent evidence.
"Evidence" of what? That someone had a bright idea that was superficially plausible? Certainly not evidence of anything that is in practice or is workable. I have nine patents. One of them came from work that did result in a working model, but the patent examiners knew nothing of it.
Throwing my uninformed 2 cents in the mix but along the lines of science not craziness, what if the Grammys being right before and being a massively (or they try to still be) broadcasted event could provide cover for energy and radio outputs. Doesn't mean it has to be the Grammys but like the Superbowl is in 3 days as well as to why other nations don't call us on it.
The Tacoma Bridge example is a disproof of your contention. The bridge was harmonically oscillated by a strong wind, WHICH PROVIDED ALL THE ENERGY. HAARP operates at a radiated power of about a megawatt, which is about a thousand horspower. Two supercharged automobiles would produce this much horsepower...but they would never be able to excite an earthquake. They would still have to produce all the energy greater than a hydrogen bomb...and they can't.
There is no linkage between HAARP and earthquakes. Heating up a patch in the ionosphere has no connection to the crust of the Earth. There is nothing "harmonic" about it. You have to establish a plausible physical theory for even thinking such a thing is possible. Just spitballing and saying "prove me wrong," will not do the trick.
I sit at my computer this morning, and what do I find? A comment to a post I made to a thread three months ago...to which you've been filling with your comments on and off since catsfive started it. I'm not sure why you're essentially communicating with just me, and singling me out, since no one is reading this thread any longer except you, but I'll go with it. You also seem to act as if I have already challenged you -- I have not "spitballed" nor said "prove me wrong." I'm not sure where this is coming from. I always treat others on this forum with respect.
You are firmly convinced of your interpretation of HAARP, and I don't need to change your mind. That's fine for you to entertain your understanding of it, but, since you asked me to respond, I will.
As others stated in this thread as well, if HAARP is indeed behind "some" earthquakes, it's not necessary for it to produce the energy you claim to cause an earthquake. All it has to do is release the pent-up energy on either side of a fault line, which, yes, is somewhat analogous to the Tacoma Bridge example. (There is, in fact, stored energy in a bridge. The weight of the structure, held by supports, contributed to the collapse once the harmonic waves began lifting, bouncing, and twisting it.) This "could" be accomplished either with standing waves, and/or localized heating of rock to the point of releasing steam to assist in the slippage. Expanding steam from groundwater, could, in fact, be all that's required to cause a fault to slip. Microwaves are good at that, no?
There is incredible energy in steam. In the example of an earthquake, it wouldn't be necessary for steam to be released all along the fault line to cause a quake. (i.e., lots and lots of energy from an exterior source interacting with the fault line for miles.) All that would be necessary is for a localized heating event to "push the first domino," so to speak. The energy stored in the plates does the rest.
You say there is no linkage between HAARP and earthquakes. You provide no evidence why you know this to be so, except for claiming that HAARP only interacts with the atmosphere. You ask me to "establish a plausible physical theory" for what I wrote, when I asked none of anyone else. You, also, didn't provide a plausible physical theory. But notice how I have written so much more to explain my point of view, than you did yours? At least I'm making a genuine attempt to explain myself.
The more one reads about this technology, the more it will become apparent that it can be focused anywhere, above or below ground. It can be reflected by the ionosphere, yes, but is this the only way it can be transmitted to distant locations? Only those who actually use this technology know for certain. But I submit to you, a microwave oven passes its energy through interior components from the magnetron to the food it's focused on in the tray, without heating up or melting those interior components. (The warming inside the oven -- other than the food and food container -- is radiant, not from the components themselves heating via the energy passing through them.) The only thing protecting you standing near it is special shielding.
I don't have time now to search, but there are videos of earthquakes and how they affect the Earth. Sometimes they just shake, but others, quite similar to waves, as a matter of fact. This was an area of interest of Nikola Tesla's. This particular event is controversial, but it is alleged he developed an "earthquake machine" -- a small device in a box with a modest output, utilizing standing wave theory. His theory was that all one needed to do was find the individual harmonic of a structure to get the structure itself to assist in amplifying the wave.
This is anecdotal, of course, but thirty minutes before the May 12, 2008 Sichuan earthquake, locals filmed very strange luminous and colorful lights in the clouds and sky. There is video of this.
Peace, brother. I'm not sure why you felt impelled to respond to a lone post I made, or why you seem offended by what I wrote. I don't come to this forum to pick "internet fights." I think it's most helpful to all who visit GAW to come to the message board with an open mind, because that's the way we can maximize what we learn. The minute we assume we know everything about a subject, is the very instant everyone else with a slightly different view becomes an adversary, and we close off the ability to perhaps absorb a new way of looking at things.
Sorry if the thread continuity is poor in this venue. Not my wheelhouse.
As for theories, one does not need to propose a theory for the fact that nothing is happening. I am acquainted with the physics of resonance, of microwaves, and of plasma (the ionosphere). There is no plausible connection between a heating of a patch of the ionosphere and an earthquake somewhere...especially far away.
The HAARP antenna can only be directed upwards to maybe + or - 60 degrees from vertical, with no good reason for such deflections. That is the nature of phased arrays. The beam resolution gets worse as it deflects from the axis of the array. (I once did a study on the placement of phased array communication antennas on the AWACS aircraft.) The point of the beam is to be absorbed, not to reflect. So, you can't have your cake and eat it, too.
A microwave oven has no focusing. The entire cavity is filled with microwaves. Your misunderstanding is an indication of your ignorance of the physics surrounding this question. The heating of food is from the water in the food, which absorbs energy from the microwave field. No "radiant" heating. The heating is from within, like a resistor getting hot when a current passes through it. You are protected by a Faraday shield in the form of a perforated metallic screen on the inside face of the glass-faced door. And that's all it is: a perforated metallic screen.
Colorful lights do not cause mechanical effects. But---to the extent that the earthquake results from stress in underlying rock, and if the underlying rock is granitic or otherwise contains much quartz---stressed quartz undergoes a polarity of charge and creates an electric field. So it is plausible that such lights are harbingers of the stresses that are about to be equilibriated by an earthquake.
Open minds are great. But empty minds are not the same thing. I run into a lot of sheer ignorance of science on this page, and it is needful to dispel ignorance before having an open mind is at all helpful.
I have a hard time keeping the right tone when it is difficult to recover a thread context, so I apologize if you felt ill-used. I also am not in this for fistfights, but I will admit that, after 45 years of practical engineering, I have little patience with ignorance walking around dressed as an open mind,
You misread my point about microwave ovens. (I'm ignorant now?) There IS radiant heating inside the oven -- that's why the walls of the oven get warm, from the radiant heating of the food. (i.e., there is no water molecules inside the plastic components to excite.) There is focusing to the extent that the microwave energy isn't evenly distributed across the interior volume. Why is food placed in the center? I also imagine there is some sort of reflective surface above the magnetron...that is a rudimentary form of focus. This schematic shows the reflection (focusing) I was referring to: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Fig-C1-Schematic-diagram-of-a-typical-microwave-oven-C1_fig39_307633263
The only reason I brought up the microwave point is that it is an example of microwave energy passing through "solid" material to reach water molecules where it can then interact. What is possible at higher wattages?
Again, you misread the reason I mentioned the colored lights in the sky preceding the Sichuan earthquake. I wasn't implying that the lights themselves caused the earthquake. The implication is that the lights are perhaps evidence of some sort of unknown energy in the atmosphere. Might it be possible for a disturbance in the atmosphere to alter magnetism to produce ground effects? I don't imagine classroom theory in universities provide any clarity to this type of question.
My dad was an engineer, specializing in aeronautics at GE for 35 years. I know full well how the "engineering mind" perceives and processes, and rejects anything foreign. I gave up trying to have interesting discussions with him...it was just too frustrating, and it gave him yet more opportunities to be dismissive. Now, in his later years, his close-mindedness has been to his detriment.
It is simply too difficult to try to discuss a concept such as this via a messageboard. We can only describe summaries and concepts, and the rest of the research is up to the reader. There are several disturbing revelations from the book, Angels Don't Play This HAARP -- among them, several patents including "Nuclear-sized Explosions Without Radiation" and electromagnetic pulse weaponry. The only thing I can say to you is that there is a basis for suspicion of this technology.
You ask a number of questions. I don't pretend to know everything, but there are several HAARP stations around the world: http://fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/environment/weather_and_climate/news.php?q=1391796727
The destructive power of HAARP is said to be in the generation of harmonic waves. I don't understand how it is focused, but I have read repeatedly that it can be focused anywhere in the planet, perhaps even into the ground as well as into the sky. The power of it has been likened to Tesla's "earthquake machine": https://mysteriousuniverse.org/2020/07/nikola-teslas-mysterious-earthquake-machine/ Whether or not the event attributed to this device ever happened, it is possible to develop incredible amounts of energy from a very modest standing wave. The Tacoma Bridge collapse is a prime example of this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XggxeuFDaDU
This scientist claims that HAARP can set off earthquakes with 30 watts of power. He allegedly is an expert on using these waves in geological exploration, like locating gas or oil deposits: https://www.bitchute.com/video/yFjCazNIqtDC/
I have worked on seismic crews where we used "vibe" trucks and microphone bags to locate oil. It's so neat watching the helicopter pilot relocate the bags for us. Epic skill.
OK, I'm going to spend some time going through all this in the next couple days. I need to understand the basics of this theory. There are some pretty big holes, some pretty big "leaps," here. Thanks for this!!!
Dig into Tesla and also Royal Rife.
We have been fed the lie that brute-force energy is the only way to get things done. Oscillation, resonance and harmonics are more powerful than they want us to know.
Like the opera singer shattering a glass. It is sustained resonant frequency causing vibration which breaks apart molecule adherence. Like Royal Rife frequency machine break apart cell walls. Like that earthquake in Turkey, collapsed building structure walls. The question we must ask is, what science is actually Science since we have basically been LIED to about everything, why would we think anything the "controllers" state is Fact is in fact FACT. I say it is mostly just Fiction and we had better start search for TRUTH in everything. GAW converts in the past 20 years think FAKE news started since 2000. It's ALL FAKE NEWS.
No. We haven't been lied to about EVERYTHING. Otherwise, you would be part of it (right?). If nothing was true, our civilization would have never formed, because we depend on truth to sustain our technology and economy. The key is to discriminate between lies and truth. And in order to doubt what you are told, YOU HAVE TO BE EDUCATED IN THE SUBJECT. I shout only to emphasize that holding up bogus conspiracy theories because one has paranoid suspicions of scientific developments is the reaction of fearful ignorance. All it takes is some know-nothing snake oil salesman to get your paranoia all keyed up over something you don't understand, be it HAARP, CERN, nuclear technology, or space travel.
No. Science can be figured out by anyone. That's literally what science is. It's why we didn't fall for the vax.
to me fake news started when Kennedy was assassinated. That is where my memories go back to. Today I am so tainted by fake news that I really have a hard time trusting anything they pushed on us since then.
There’s another poppycock theory. If opera singers could shatter glass it would be a common parlor trick and there would be videos everywhere. In reality, the human vocal tract cannot generate enough energy nor focus it finely enough to shatter a glass. Name the last singer to do it.
Well said!
Brilliant, I also think that's closer to what is supposedly happening, but, you'll for sure agree that it's a LOOOONG way away from explaining "earthquakes from ionospheric energy" eh?
Well, then, that would include you, wouldn't it?
That's not enough. That's merely "personal incredulity" masked with word salad
Yes, OK, but, just saying that shouldn't automatically preclude the emergency of a coherent, reasonably explainable theory of what exactly is happening, is my point.
Emergency?
Anyway, I'm late to the party (night shift time zone) but I'll add my 2 cents worth.
An earthquake releases stored energy. It can be triggered by a simple stream of water that lubricates two underground rock faces. There was a big hoohah in the UK about this when fracking triggered a small earthquake in the Midlands area.
The amount of energy required to trigger an earthquake therefore can be tiny.
Exactly how the HAARP antenna array could trigger an earthquake - only those involved in the projects know. I can't guess.
The HAARP antenna array certainly has the "steering" capability: the antenna phases can be altered to focus energy anywhere within visual range.
The original Russian "woodpecker" used pulsed radio frequency to achieve whatever it was designed for. (Top secret but probably weather modification.) By using line-of-sight microwave frequencies, the possibility of picking up the transmissions on an ordinary radio receiver (as per "woodpecker") is eliminated. Detection of microwave transmissions (afaik) is possible only within the beam.
Earthquakes are often preceded by "lights in the sky". I don't know when this was first observed but it's well documented. Microwave pulses aimed at the ionosphere could certainly ionise the air and produce "lights".
Don't be confused by the term "electromagnetic". Think of a microwave oven. It focuses a microwave energy beam on the turntable. If the beam is very narrow, it can be effective over a great distance (think "laser"). The HAARP array extends over a large area; the greater the width, the narrower the focus. (Think satellite TV dish.)
I'm an electronics engineer - think OLD - experienced (and modest, too!). I've dealt with high frequency equipment. Microwave energy reflects off surfaces. It can reflect off atmospheric layers. I can certainly believe that technology exists, which could trigger an earthquake. I was a teenager when I listened to the "woodpecker" on my vacuum tube radio. The Russians, Chinese and Americans have had six decades to work on this technology.
The idea of resonance should not be dismissed. If a powerful energy beam is pulsed at the Schumann frequency and aimed (or reflected) at the Earth, I can imagine that bad things could happen. It might be worth looking at this page when an earthquake occurs: https://in5d.com/todays-live-schumann-resonance-charts-and-resources/
I just bought "Angels don't play this HAARP - Advances in Tesla Technology".
(You can get a free PDF copy if you know where to look.)
There's an interview of the author discussing the book here (1995): https://files.catbox.moe/gkus9l.mp3
Gives a quick overview of the book. Worth a listen.
It's no lie if that's the only way things can get done. Mumbo-jumbo has no power whatsoever. No evidence of it.
Be aware of the patent pushers. There are many patents related to HAARP and every other fantastic scheme. I had a friend who patented a means for gathering energy from black holes. Having a patent doesn't mean it works or exists, but it's a favorite "proof."
"Be[ing] aware of patent pushers," suggests that a patent existing for something is "not good evidence." On the contrary, it is excellent evidence. Getting a U.S. patent is not easy. If you successfully get a patent, it suggests that it is at least plausible within the context of sound principles of engineering.
I agree that such "excellent evidence" is not sufficient evidence to meet the burden of proof of "beyond a reasonable doubt" for something working or existing, but that doesn't make it not excellent evidence.
You can patent anything in the USA, even a perpetual motion machine. (but it has to come with a working model)
Some of the USN patents are batshit crazy, but they are there.
"Evidence" of what? That someone had a bright idea that was superficially plausible? Certainly not evidence of anything that is in practice or is workable. I have nine patents. One of them came from work that did result in a working model, but the patent examiners knew nothing of it.
Throwing my uninformed 2 cents in the mix but along the lines of science not craziness, what if the Grammys being right before and being a massively (or they try to still be) broadcasted event could provide cover for energy and radio outputs. Doesn't mean it has to be the Grammys but like the Superbowl is in 3 days as well as to why other nations don't call us on it.
I did not know you were a Doodle Bugger! KEK
^this is why Fringe was basically my favorite show of all time
If energy is focused on a weak spot doesn't require that much.
They just need enough to "light the fuse", send small vibrations for long enough to trigger what they want.
You could probably do this, but not with 30 watts, and building something resonant would literally destroy the earth.
The Tacoma Bridge example is a disproof of your contention. The bridge was harmonically oscillated by a strong wind, WHICH PROVIDED ALL THE ENERGY. HAARP operates at a radiated power of about a megawatt, which is about a thousand horspower. Two supercharged automobiles would produce this much horsepower...but they would never be able to excite an earthquake. They would still have to produce all the energy greater than a hydrogen bomb...and they can't.
There is no linkage between HAARP and earthquakes. Heating up a patch in the ionosphere has no connection to the crust of the Earth. There is nothing "harmonic" about it. You have to establish a plausible physical theory for even thinking such a thing is possible. Just spitballing and saying "prove me wrong," will not do the trick.
I sit at my computer this morning, and what do I find? A comment to a post I made to a thread three months ago...to which you've been filling with your comments on and off since catsfive started it. I'm not sure why you're essentially communicating with just me, and singling me out, since no one is reading this thread any longer except you, but I'll go with it. You also seem to act as if I have already challenged you -- I have not "spitballed" nor said "prove me wrong." I'm not sure where this is coming from. I always treat others on this forum with respect.
You are firmly convinced of your interpretation of HAARP, and I don't need to change your mind. That's fine for you to entertain your understanding of it, but, since you asked me to respond, I will.
As others stated in this thread as well, if HAARP is indeed behind "some" earthquakes, it's not necessary for it to produce the energy you claim to cause an earthquake. All it has to do is release the pent-up energy on either side of a fault line, which, yes, is somewhat analogous to the Tacoma Bridge example. (There is, in fact, stored energy in a bridge. The weight of the structure, held by supports, contributed to the collapse once the harmonic waves began lifting, bouncing, and twisting it.) This "could" be accomplished either with standing waves, and/or localized heating of rock to the point of releasing steam to assist in the slippage. Expanding steam from groundwater, could, in fact, be all that's required to cause a fault to slip. Microwaves are good at that, no?
There is incredible energy in steam. In the example of an earthquake, it wouldn't be necessary for steam to be released all along the fault line to cause a quake. (i.e., lots and lots of energy from an exterior source interacting with the fault line for miles.) All that would be necessary is for a localized heating event to "push the first domino," so to speak. The energy stored in the plates does the rest.
You say there is no linkage between HAARP and earthquakes. You provide no evidence why you know this to be so, except for claiming that HAARP only interacts with the atmosphere. You ask me to "establish a plausible physical theory" for what I wrote, when I asked none of anyone else. You, also, didn't provide a plausible physical theory. But notice how I have written so much more to explain my point of view, than you did yours? At least I'm making a genuine attempt to explain myself.
The more one reads about this technology, the more it will become apparent that it can be focused anywhere, above or below ground. It can be reflected by the ionosphere, yes, but is this the only way it can be transmitted to distant locations? Only those who actually use this technology know for certain. But I submit to you, a microwave oven passes its energy through interior components from the magnetron to the food it's focused on in the tray, without heating up or melting those interior components. (The warming inside the oven -- other than the food and food container -- is radiant, not from the components themselves heating via the energy passing through them.) The only thing protecting you standing near it is special shielding.
I don't have time now to search, but there are videos of earthquakes and how they affect the Earth. Sometimes they just shake, but others, quite similar to waves, as a matter of fact. This was an area of interest of Nikola Tesla's. This particular event is controversial, but it is alleged he developed an "earthquake machine" -- a small device in a box with a modest output, utilizing standing wave theory. His theory was that all one needed to do was find the individual harmonic of a structure to get the structure itself to assist in amplifying the wave.
This is anecdotal, of course, but thirty minutes before the May 12, 2008 Sichuan earthquake, locals filmed very strange luminous and colorful lights in the clouds and sky. There is video of this.
Peace, brother. I'm not sure why you felt impelled to respond to a lone post I made, or why you seem offended by what I wrote. I don't come to this forum to pick "internet fights." I think it's most helpful to all who visit GAW to come to the message board with an open mind, because that's the way we can maximize what we learn. The minute we assume we know everything about a subject, is the very instant everyone else with a slightly different view becomes an adversary, and we close off the ability to perhaps absorb a new way of looking at things.
Sorry if the thread continuity is poor in this venue. Not my wheelhouse.
As for theories, one does not need to propose a theory for the fact that nothing is happening. I am acquainted with the physics of resonance, of microwaves, and of plasma (the ionosphere). There is no plausible connection between a heating of a patch of the ionosphere and an earthquake somewhere...especially far away.
The HAARP antenna can only be directed upwards to maybe + or - 60 degrees from vertical, with no good reason for such deflections. That is the nature of phased arrays. The beam resolution gets worse as it deflects from the axis of the array. (I once did a study on the placement of phased array communication antennas on the AWACS aircraft.) The point of the beam is to be absorbed, not to reflect. So, you can't have your cake and eat it, too.
A microwave oven has no focusing. The entire cavity is filled with microwaves. Your misunderstanding is an indication of your ignorance of the physics surrounding this question. The heating of food is from the water in the food, which absorbs energy from the microwave field. No "radiant" heating. The heating is from within, like a resistor getting hot when a current passes through it. You are protected by a Faraday shield in the form of a perforated metallic screen on the inside face of the glass-faced door. And that's all it is: a perforated metallic screen.
Colorful lights do not cause mechanical effects. But---to the extent that the earthquake results from stress in underlying rock, and if the underlying rock is granitic or otherwise contains much quartz---stressed quartz undergoes a polarity of charge and creates an electric field. So it is plausible that such lights are harbingers of the stresses that are about to be equilibriated by an earthquake.
Open minds are great. But empty minds are not the same thing. I run into a lot of sheer ignorance of science on this page, and it is needful to dispel ignorance before having an open mind is at all helpful.
I have a hard time keeping the right tone when it is difficult to recover a thread context, so I apologize if you felt ill-used. I also am not in this for fistfights, but I will admit that, after 45 years of practical engineering, I have little patience with ignorance walking around dressed as an open mind,
You misread my point about microwave ovens. (I'm ignorant now?) There IS radiant heating inside the oven -- that's why the walls of the oven get warm, from the radiant heating of the food. (i.e., there is no water molecules inside the plastic components to excite.) There is focusing to the extent that the microwave energy isn't evenly distributed across the interior volume. Why is food placed in the center? I also imagine there is some sort of reflective surface above the magnetron...that is a rudimentary form of focus. This schematic shows the reflection (focusing) I was referring to: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Fig-C1-Schematic-diagram-of-a-typical-microwave-oven-C1_fig39_307633263
The only reason I brought up the microwave point is that it is an example of microwave energy passing through "solid" material to reach water molecules where it can then interact. What is possible at higher wattages?
Again, you misread the reason I mentioned the colored lights in the sky preceding the Sichuan earthquake. I wasn't implying that the lights themselves caused the earthquake. The implication is that the lights are perhaps evidence of some sort of unknown energy in the atmosphere. Might it be possible for a disturbance in the atmosphere to alter magnetism to produce ground effects? I don't imagine classroom theory in universities provide any clarity to this type of question.
My dad was an engineer, specializing in aeronautics at GE for 35 years. I know full well how the "engineering mind" perceives and processes, and rejects anything foreign. I gave up trying to have interesting discussions with him...it was just too frustrating, and it gave him yet more opportunities to be dismissive. Now, in his later years, his close-mindedness has been to his detriment.
It is simply too difficult to try to discuss a concept such as this via a messageboard. We can only describe summaries and concepts, and the rest of the research is up to the reader. There are several disturbing revelations from the book, Angels Don't Play This HAARP -- among them, several patents including "Nuclear-sized Explosions Without Radiation" and electromagnetic pulse weaponry. The only thing I can say to you is that there is a basis for suspicion of this technology.