just because someone slightly criticizes DJT doesn't immediately makes them controlled opposition.
Obviously, but also, you never watched any of his shows, so how much context do you have.
One single action is very rarely enough to identify someone's motives, agenda or direction. But Stew Peter's exhibits a lot more.
Note also, did DJT ever "promise" to lock Hillary up? As far as I know, it was a rebuttal in a debate, but what about on the campaign trail? So, is ti even a fair statement to say that it was a major campaign promise? I'd be happy to see the data.
An attack asset (like any underhanded operation) will strike by first projecting vulnerability. And, they use rhetoric rather than facts.
Hillary committed the most extreme acts of espionage against the USA since the Rosenburg's sold the A-bomb to the USSR. DJT was in charge of the military, and DoJ. Hillary is still free, and continues to damage the USA.
If DJT isn't responsible for letting the bitch walk, who is? Who do we the people need to hold accountable for the failure to lock Hillary up? Answer: The republican party establishment; losers, weaklings, and traitors. The party needs to be demolished to it's core.
The bigger picture you are sadly missing is that arresting the puppets would solve nothing. They just wipe the slate clean and bring out new puppets and push back their plan by another 20 years. And rinse and repeat. Until people wake up. Until there is Great Awakening. Which is where we are headed, right now.
Yeah well, that awakening would be happening a hell of lot faster, and more productively if ANY of the leftist icons of injustice were in jail- or better, exploded in an electric chair like, Ethel Rosenberg.
Again you are missing the point. Putting someone in the jail will wake people up for a few days about that particular person. Not about what the Cabal is planning to do to all of us. But yeah, if you lose the plot the world will indeed look dark to you.
If the DOJ/FBI etc are totally politicized and basically a fifth column how was Pres Trump supposed to prosecute her? Time has shown he was enveloped by a fifth column who ignored/obfuscated/slow walked/sabotaged anything he instructed or tried to do, aided by a media/democrat complex that screw CT Ed to the high heavens to have him hung drawn and quartered if he had the temerity to try to get “law enforcement” to do their damned jobs
I agree with that. Trump should not be faulted for the crimes of the swamp, and traitorous cowards who undermined our justice system for their own personal goals, and to further the swamp globohomo/commie/nazi agenda.
But we the people do need to hold somebody accountable. Who bears the ultimate responsibility for [most] everything that has been going wrong in America for the last 30 years?
I'll give you a hint- Which president first steered America onto a course to lead a "new world order," then allied US corporate interests with communist China?
We know he apparently undermined his own movie and everyone in it by including video of people collapsing who weren't vaxxed. It was the primary lead during debunks.
I'm willing to consider he's just been undermined, but he often forces things in very inelegant ways despite a seemingly solid budget.
Who has that much money and time to crank out movies and programming on ideas they haven't vetted? It's a spook activity. Real people have jobs and families. Who is this guy?
I'll go far out there with another one: Steve Kirsch. Obsessed with the idea that Hamlin is vaxx injured even though the whole thing obviously could have been staged. MIT connections. Stew Peters connections. The guy has been begging for a chance to debate the vax and I listened to him collapse in the @iancopeland5 Twitter stream in a pathetically unprepared and emotional manner.
Now if you're thinking mirror and looking for a deep undercover white hat, consider iancopeland5 because he is upping the intellectual rigor of his alleged opponents (us), vs. feeding us what we want to hear (Steve and Stew).
I was not defending this particular individual(As I said as a preface), my context is the one provided by OP itself.
All I said is that you can't immediately label someone as controlled opposition based solely on this, as you point out yourself is an obvious assumption, though for OP seemed to be more than enough to outright confirm the accusation.
I may not have watched any of his stuff, but I did get some of it from pure osmosis, and seems to me he always heavily attacked the whole cOViD scam at least.
Also, DJT may not have outright come out and said "IMMA LOCK THAT BITCH UP!!! because that'd have gone very poorly, but he did promise he was going to "drain the swamp", so locking that wretch up should be implied one would think.
At least that's what a "normie" would think I'd guess, us that have some understanding of "the plan" might be able to shrug it off, but it still stands that to immediate appearances very little swamp draining was done.
Note, the OP said "confirmed". Which really implies, to me, that there are already suspicions, doubts, thoughts that SP is controlled opposition. I certainly fall into that category, although I'm fairly happy with my conclusion as opposed to mere suspicion.
So, sure, based ONLY on this (i.e. one action), you cannot label anyone controlled oppo, but if you have 10 other data points, then certainly this one might clinch the deal. Which is what I think the OP is saying, and which I am inclined to agree with.
To me, the entire post by Peters reeks of controlled oppo attack. I might try to quantify that via a rigorous textual analysis (a field in which I have some training), but it would take a few pages to write that all up in a way that articulates it to the layman. By which, I'm not suggesting you should take my word for it. I'm just saying, that for me, the post reeks, and as such, goes a long way to supporting the OP's primary assertion - that SP just confirmed the role he's playing.
That attack on DJT as not having fulfilled a promise to lock up Clinton stinks to high heaven, imo, but I will grant that interpretation is going to depend a lot on what your starting point is. I have no issue if someone doesn't see it like that, but I'm still going to testify as to what my perception is!!!!
Obviously, but also, you never watched any of his shows, so how much context do you have.
One single action is very rarely enough to identify someone's motives, agenda or direction. But Stew Peter's exhibits a lot more.
Note also, did DJT ever "promise" to lock Hillary up? As far as I know, it was a rebuttal in a debate, but what about on the campaign trail? So, is ti even a fair statement to say that it was a major campaign promise? I'd be happy to see the data.
An attack asset (like any underhanded operation) will strike by first projecting vulnerability. And, they use rhetoric rather than facts.
Hillary committed the most extreme acts of espionage against the USA since the Rosenburg's sold the A-bomb to the USSR. DJT was in charge of the military, and DoJ. Hillary is still free, and continues to damage the USA.
If DJT isn't responsible for letting the bitch walk, who is? Who do we the people need to hold accountable for the failure to lock Hillary up? Answer: The republican party establishment; losers, weaklings, and traitors. The party needs to be demolished to it's core.
The bigger picture you are sadly missing is that arresting the puppets would solve nothing. They just wipe the slate clean and bring out new puppets and push back their plan by another 20 years. And rinse and repeat. Until people wake up. Until there is Great Awakening. Which is where we are headed, right now.
Yeah well, that awakening would be happening a hell of lot faster, and more productively if ANY of the leftist icons of injustice were in jail- or better, exploded in an electric chair like, Ethel Rosenberg.
Again you are missing the point. Putting someone in the jail will wake people up for a few days about that particular person. Not about what the Cabal is planning to do to all of us. But yeah, if you lose the plot the world will indeed look dark to you.
You're too focused on the leftists. Remember the fucking Bushes?
This isn't a political issue or a party issue. It's a fate of mankind issue.
If the DOJ/FBI etc are totally politicized and basically a fifth column how was Pres Trump supposed to prosecute her? Time has shown he was enveloped by a fifth column who ignored/obfuscated/slow walked/sabotaged anything he instructed or tried to do, aided by a media/democrat complex that screw CT Ed to the high heavens to have him hung drawn and quartered if he had the temerity to try to get “law enforcement” to do their damned jobs
I agree with that. Trump should not be faulted for the crimes of the swamp, and traitorous cowards who undermined our justice system for their own personal goals, and to further the swamp globohomo/commie/nazi agenda.
But we the people do need to hold somebody accountable. Who bears the ultimate responsibility for [most] everything that has been going wrong in America for the last 30 years?
I'll give you a hint- Which president first steered America onto a course to lead a "new world order," then allied US corporate interests with communist China?
We know he apparently undermined his own movie and everyone in it by including video of people collapsing who weren't vaxxed. It was the primary lead during debunks.
I'm willing to consider he's just been undermined, but he often forces things in very inelegant ways despite a seemingly solid budget.
Who has that much money and time to crank out movies and programming on ideas they haven't vetted? It's a spook activity. Real people have jobs and families. Who is this guy?
I'll go far out there with another one: Steve Kirsch. Obsessed with the idea that Hamlin is vaxx injured even though the whole thing obviously could have been staged. MIT connections. Stew Peters connections. The guy has been begging for a chance to debate the vax and I listened to him collapse in the @iancopeland5 Twitter stream in a pathetically unprepared and emotional manner.
Now if you're thinking mirror and looking for a deep undercover white hat, consider iancopeland5 because he is upping the intellectual rigor of his alleged opponents (us), vs. feeding us what we want to hear (Steve and Stew).
I was not defending this particular individual(As I said as a preface), my context is the one provided by OP itself.
All I said is that you can't immediately label someone as controlled opposition based solely on this, as you point out yourself is an obvious assumption, though for OP seemed to be more than enough to outright confirm the accusation.
I may not have watched any of his stuff, but I did get some of it from pure osmosis, and seems to me he always heavily attacked the whole cOViD scam at least.
Also, DJT may not have outright come out and said "IMMA LOCK THAT BITCH UP!!! because that'd have gone very poorly, but he did promise he was going to "drain the swamp", so locking that wretch up should be implied one would think.
At least that's what a "normie" would think I'd guess, us that have some understanding of "the plan" might be able to shrug it off, but it still stands that to immediate appearances very little swamp draining was done.
Note, the OP said "confirmed". Which really implies, to me, that there are already suspicions, doubts, thoughts that SP is controlled opposition. I certainly fall into that category, although I'm fairly happy with my conclusion as opposed to mere suspicion.
So, sure, based ONLY on this (i.e. one action), you cannot label anyone controlled oppo, but if you have 10 other data points, then certainly this one might clinch the deal. Which is what I think the OP is saying, and which I am inclined to agree with.
To me, the entire post by Peters reeks of controlled oppo attack. I might try to quantify that via a rigorous textual analysis (a field in which I have some training), but it would take a few pages to write that all up in a way that articulates it to the layman. By which, I'm not suggesting you should take my word for it. I'm just saying, that for me, the post reeks, and as such, goes a long way to supporting the OP's primary assertion - that SP just confirmed the role he's playing.
That attack on DJT as not having fulfilled a promise to lock up Clinton stinks to high heaven, imo, but I will grant that interpretation is going to depend a lot on what your starting point is. I have no issue if someone doesn't see it like that, but I'm still going to testify as to what my perception is!!!!