So pointing out flaws in your theory and offering counter evidence is a rant?
Basically you're here to tell me that I'm all wrong and the medical establishment is all right. Do I have your position accurately summarized?
I'm saying that viral and bacterial pathology does a better job of articulating its ideas, making accurate predictions, and providing evidence than you have.
Do you trust the media? Do you trust academia? You must, right? You keep citing both again and again as if we can trust them. Are you kidding me?
It's not a matter of trust, it's a matter of who has better arguments and evidence. Your model doesn't even accurately model the spread of communicable diseases because it denies that people catch bacteria from others and denies the viruses exist entirely. And I'll take the establishment's evidence over your complete lack of evidence any day, because at least they try to defend their position.
We know Covid is an engineered bioweapon because there's evidence.
We know the masking and social distance policies were ineffective and tyrannical because there's evidence
We know the Covid jabs are ineffective and have lethal side effects because there's evidence.
We know the medical establishment is wrong on the above items specifically because there's evidence. If you switch to the topic of viruses and bacteria not existing or not being pathogenic at all, that is a different set of claims, and it's your job to justify your own claims.
The establishment isn't wrong just because they're the establishment. If you're going to assert that anyone is wrong on any given subject, it's your responsibility to explain why and provide evidence. Simply screaming that they're the establishment isn't an argument, it's an inversion of the appeal to authority fallacy. Being anti-establishment for the sake of being anti-establishment isn't helpful. Such an attitude, when not based on evidence and rational arguments, is purely emotional thinking.
Why are you here on GA? To set us crazy conspiracy theorists straight?
Why are you here? To make us look like unhinged kooks like the flat-earthers and NESARA scammers do? To kill us off with bad medical advice? I can make random accusations too.
My aim is to help people think critically about everything, and this includes analyzing evidence and arguments both for and against your current position. Only looking at "evidence" that supports your pet theory is how flat earthers get to where they are. My aim is exact high standards for evidence and arguments so that this community doesn't get to that place, as it wastes time and turns newcomers off from our movement if they see that its members ignoring basic facts and logic.
You have provided neither evidence nor rational arguments for your position. You randomly associate various phobias to random diseases with no rhyme, reason, or explanation; claim that all diseases boil down to mind games, claim that cancer tissues are temporary and beneficial, claim that the human body creates bacteria, claim that viruses don't exist at all, and claim that TB has a less than 1% mortality rate. All of this without any supporting evidence, and when opposing evidence is presented you kick and scream that it's not true because it comes from people you don't like and it contradicts your position. This is not the mindset of a rational adult or truth-seeker, this is the mindset of an irrational child.
Just to be clear, before I begin, let the record show that you're here on GA to help us by shilling the establishment medical narrative that is REPLETE with DELIBERATE FLAWS & ASSUMPTIONS, not honest errors and mistakes, that are designed to disempower humanity and keep us operating in a state of FEAR. None of which you yet REALIZE as demonstrated by your continuing attempts to uphold the establishment lamestream narrative.
I find this remarkable actually. You must be EXTREMELY NEW to GA/Q/Conspiracy Reality. Apparently I'm going to be forced to treat you like somebody from the "Democracy Now" forum or Facebook - a normie - a died-in-the-wool academic. This requires an entirely different approach. After many years of interacting with this class of consciousness, I have a near complete understanding of to proceed as such. An entirely different approach than how I interact with the general GA population.
Have you ever heard the quote: "It's easier to fool somebody than to convince them they've been fooled"? It's a highly accurate statement. Do you know who said it? Mark Twain you say? So the 99% believe. Guess what? Even with this quote, as accurate as it is, it's doubly powerful as it proves the very point it's making. Because were you to dig a little deeper you'd learn that there's no evidence that Twain ever said this. As it turns out, there are dozens upon dozens of witty, intelligent and satirical quotes attributed to Twain that simply can't be verified as being said by Twain. In short, Twain is the "witty/intelligent quote go-to-guy", having uttered so many in his career. And had you taken the time to look a little further into the matter, you'd find out that Twain has, on at least two different occasions, made statements echoing the sentiment of the quote essentially using different words.
I share all this as it makes four invaluable points that must be understood if you wish to extricate yourself from the establishment quagmire. The first is, you, me and everybody else have been FOOLED millions of times over. Second, you must also realize that nobody wants to admit they've been fooled. It's human nature. And this is why it's so much harder to convince you that you've been fooled. You demonstrate this over and over again with nearly every point you think you're making about what I've said. Ringing loudly within all your efforts to tell me I'm wrong and discredit me is the sentiment "there's no way I've been fooled because look at all the (Pseudo)-evidence I can find with a rapid-fire Google search that supports my beliefs." And thirdly, you make the cardinal sin throughout your efforts, BLINDLY BELIEVING IN AUTHORITY without making a single effort to investigate any deeper. And fourth, you make no effort to do any critical thinking before making your points. You accept what you're being told at face value.
This is the "Authority Syndrome" brainwashing that all our leftist, normie, NPC friends are fully mesmerized by. And extricating them from it has thus far been near-impossible to achieve.
Another thing I find quite fascinating is trying to understand what you think I'm doing here. It appears you are under the impression that I "made everything up" on my own as you continue to refer to "my theory". You also clearly think I'm a lunatic of sorts, sharing highly damaging and detrimental health and well-being information in order to cause harm and injury to my fellow humanity. Thus, in your mind, you've branded me an actual THREAT to your very well-being and safety. This you've made quite clear.
I find your position astonishingly naive and completely backwards as it's made abundantly clear on a daily basis here on GA that in reality, in truth and in all fact, it is the ESTABLISHMENT MEDICAL COMMUNITY that has proven to be the greatest threat to humanity's health and well-being. There's zero chance you're not aware of this frequenting this board.
This is inexcusable ignorance on your part which makes me question your intentions all the more. Now I do understand, many people here think it's just the recent Covid narrative and poisonous jabs when the establishment lost its way, not yet aware of how long the lies and deceptions have been going on. But this group of people approach what I say with curiosity and questions, not deliberate attempts to cast me as a fool, and worse, accuse me of spreading information that is detrimental to their health.
You're the first of this kind I have encountered. And make no mistake, you've cast me in this light of being "the real bad guy out to harm people" with everything you've said thus far. Let's not kid ourselves.
So pointing out flaws in your theory and offering counter evidence is a rant?
Let's use clear language as we proceed. Would you agree that you BELIEVE you pointed out some flaws in "My theory"? The only person thus far crediting you with pointing out any flaws is you. Right?
So I'm going to give you the opportunity to pick the most definitive "flaw" you BELIEVE you've pointed out and we'll dissect it from beginning to end. We simply don't have time to handle each one right now due to your present state of authority-mesmerization-syndrome. Hopefully, having walked you through your favorite one, you can then do your own due diligence and unwind the other points you think you've made.
So pick your favorite "flaw" and we'll do a deep dive together. That is, if you're ready to learn how you've been fooled.
I'm saying that viral and bacterial pathology does a better job of articulating its ideas, making accurate predictions, and providing evidence than you have.
Then you're deeply lost in the establishment, academic deception. This is the FUNDAMENTAL problem you have - blind belief in authority. As the ENTIRETY of viral and bacterial pathology is a LIE. Not some of it. Not a few parts of it. The whole she-bang, from beginning to end. The very fact that Koch's Postulates have never been satisfied should be all I need to say to prove my point. But unfortunately, due to your BELIEFS, it could take us quite some time to show you how you, and all the virologists and bacteriologists out there have been quite easily FOOLED, and why it's so hard to now convince them of such.
Is this your favorite "flaw" you wish to do a deep-dive on?
It's not a matter of trust, it's a matter of who has better arguments and evidence.
So you're now on record stating the establishment medical academics have Better arguments and evidence. Perhaps you'd prefer we dissect this irrational belief system flaw of yours? I can assure you, the exact opposite is the truth. Myself and thousands of others earnestly looked for these "better arguments and evidence" for well over a year. We couldn't find a shred of it. Not even a single point we could give them credit for. All we found were lies, deceptions and brainwashees blindly believing authorities.
Your model doesn't even accurately model the spread of communicable diseases because it denies that people catch bacteria from others and denies the viruses exist entirely.
Your thinking is backwards and this is perhaps the biggest hurdle we have to overcome. Do you believe Unicorns exist? If not, then you "deny they exist" which implies you're at fault, you're the "bad guy", you're the "denier". You cast aspersions in the wrong direction with this line of reasoning.
Further, your sentence IMPLICITLY ASSERTS the existence of such a thing known as a "Communicable Dis-ease". To assert that which has yet to be scientifically proven is what you've done in several of your points thus far. You've got the cart ahead of the horse. You're miles downstream from the lies and deceptions.
We know Covid is an engineered bioweapon because there's evidence.
And yet again, asserting what is unproven. You're a blind believer in the authoritative narrative. The only "We" in your sentence are the blind believers. Considering this is a dialogue between two people, this is a remarkably IGNORANT and ARROGANT statement to make as the only "we" in this context is you and I. And I can assure you, I have not seen a shred of scientific evidence demonstrating there is such a THING as "Covid (SARS-CoV2)". But you go one step further downstream in your false claim. Not only do you assert there is such a "thing", but you go one step further and also falsely claim this "thing" is a "bioweapon". All without a shred of actual proof.
Do you see how you're failing to make your points on all counts? Is this the "flaw in my theory" you wish to do a deep dive on? You've got to pick only one as it's obviously going to take a great deal of time and effort to deconstruct the myriad of FALSE BELIEFS you hold in your mind as "truths".
If you switch to the topic of viruses and bacteria not existing or not being pathogenic at all, that is a different set of claims, and it's your job to justify your own claims.
Damn straight it is. But you aren't interested in understanding this. Because you assert again and again and again that I can't possibly achieve this. Your mind is closed. You've clearly demonstrated this with every statement you make. After all "we know Covid is an engineered bioweapon", right?
Amidst the myriad of logical fallacies you are trying to wield against me, this is yet another; the "reverse proof of claim logical fallacy". There's a maxim of law that states: "He who makes the claim bears the burden of proof". And in all we're discussing, the CLAIMANT is undeniably our trillion-dollar medical establishment cabal. So is this the "flaw" you wish to investigate? That you believe the establishment can support their claim that viruses exist or bacteria are pathogenic?
The establishment isn't wrong just because they're the establishment. If you're going to assert that anyone is wrong on any given subject, it's your responsibility to explain why and provide evidence.
LOL. You've got everything backwards yet again. The problem we're going to have here is that you don't realize that what you have accepted as "evidence" of your BELIEFS is anything but. It's going to be a long unwind to demonstrate because it's clear you aren't yet ready to accept the possibility that you've been *FOOLED yet. This you make clear again and again.
Simply screaming that they're the establishment isn't an argument, it's an inversion of the appeal to authority fallacy.
You'd think after all we've been through the past 3 years, you'd be open to what I say and doing some investigation of your own. But nope, you're actually trapped in this space where they only pulled off the great Covid lie recently. That it took them over a hundred years to pull off this lie you are entirely unwilling to accept as a possibility. In your mind, it's simply IMPOSSIBLE that this is the case. This is what you think -> "there's no way they could have been lying to us all this time about "muh germs". This is your resounding stance. IMPOSSIBLE. You overtly admit to this again and again. There's just no way you could have been fooled, is there?
Being anti-establishment for the sake of being anti-establishment isn't helpful. Such an attitude, when not based on evidence and rational arguments, is purely emotional thinking.
Who said it was? It is you that builds the strawman arguments. You're projecting all the time as well. By your name-calling and implications about what I've shared and my intentions, it is you that has injected "emotional thinking" into this discourse.
Not once did you say - "well, what you say is certainly interesting, what led you to these conclusions"? Not even once. All you've done this far is attack, attack and attack what I've said from a deeply EMOTIONAL state of FEAR.
let the record show that you're here on GA to help us by shilling the establishment medical narrative that is REPLETE with DELIBERATE FLAWS & ASSUMPTIONS,
Yet you have failed to show one instance where germ theory or viral pathology are incorrect, and your own theory has zero predictive power.
I find this remarkable actually. You must be EXTREMELY NEW to GA/Q/Conspiracy Reality.
Ah, the old argument of "my opponent disagrees with me, therefore they're an idiot". Nice ad hominem. I've been in the Q space for at least 2 years now. So what? Seniority does not magically bestow legitimacy.
This is the FUNDAMENTAL problem you have - blind belief in authority.
Asking for evidence and logic equals blind belief in authority.... right. Whatever you say.
[on whether Covid is a bioweapon] And yet again, asserting what is unproven. You're a blind believer in the authoritative narrative.
But the idea that Covid is a bioweapon runs counter to the dominant medical establishment. So then I am not blindly believing authority, if I was I wouldn't be on GAW in the first place.
Because you assert again and again and again that I can't possibly achieve this. [prove that bacteria/viruses aren't the cause of disease]
I never said you couldn't, I said you haven't. Not once have explained how emotional states or phobias trigger illnesses, you just assert that this is the case and expect me to believe you because you're anti establishment, which ironically is itself a call to blind belief in authority.
"He who makes the claim bears the burden of proof". And in all we're discussing, the CLAIMANT is undeniably our trillion-dollar medical establishment cabal. So is this the "flaw" you wish to investigate?
Being a multi-trillion dollar industry is neither a crime nor a flaw. If so, then the scam artists who push flat earth, NESARA, and germ theory are guilty of the exact same thing on a smaller scale.
The problem we're going to have here is that you don't realize that what you have accepted as "evidence" of your BELIEFS is anything but.
You are pushing the claim that the evidence for germ theory is bunk. That's YOUR claim, which means YOU have to defend it.
You'd think after all we've been through the past 3 years, you'd be open to what I say and doing some investigation of your own.
I am open to those who make reasonable arguments and put forward evidence, you have done neither. I'm still waiting for which strain of Hepatitis excessive anger causes, and how the heck an emotional state causes an blood-borne pathogen/STD.
Not once did you say - "well, what you say is certainly interesting, what led you to these conclusions"? Not even once. All you've done this far is attack, attack and attack what I've said from a deeply EMOTIONAL state of FEAR.
Pointing out potential problems and lack of evidence is a golden opportunity for you to explain how you arrived at your conclusions. Yet you have failed to do so; you have only doubled down on your assertions with no explanation and failed to address the contradictory evidence that I provided. Putting your theory under scrutiny is not an attack, it is how ideas are forged and refined. All theories should be subject to scrutiny, and if you view that as an attack, all it shows is that you are the one who is afraid of criticism.
Why are you here? To make us look like unhinged kooks like the flat-earthers and NESARA scammers do? To kill us off with bad medical advice? I can make random accusations too.
I'm here to spread wisdom and pointers to truth to like-minded people. You're clearly the one spreading 'bad medical advice" by continuously shilling for the establishment medical cartel. But obviously, you don't realize this which is the most frightening aspect of it all. As with the vast majority of our profoundly miseducated "doctors", you all actually think you're "doing the right thing" by spreading the BELIEFS you mistakenly accept as "truths". Because again, it's absolutely IMPOSSIBLE that you all could have been fooled, right?
My aim is to help people think critically about everything, and this includes analyzing evidence and arguments both for and against your current position.
Well if this is the case, it won't take us much time for you to see that I'm correct in my assertions. The fundamental problem you're going to have is coming to terms with the fact that what you accept as "evidence" is anything but.
Only looking at "evidence" that supports your pet theory is how flat earthers get to where they are.
Dude, you're suffering deeply from multiple CIA-psyop-brainwashing syndromes. Just stop now. You're embarrassing yourself. We've got too much to contend with already. You're a blind-believer-in-authority on steroids.
My aim is exact high standards for evidence and arguments so that this community doesn't get to that place, as it wastes time and turns newcomers off from our movement if they see that its members ignoring basic facts and logic.
You're the biggest "turn off" to "our movement" I've yet to encounter here, and I've been here since the beginning. So congratulations on winning that award. Can't you see you're 100% SHILLING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT with every single point you try to make? If you can't see this you're in one heckuva quagmire that's going to be extremely tough for you to get out of. And frankly, you're a tremendous detriment to "our movement". Because "our movement" is going to deconstruct and decimate the entire establishment narrative which is built entirely on LIES AND DECEPTIONS. And there are no exceptions. The FOUNDATION of every major institution wielding power and control over us is lies, lies and more lies. A fact you are clearly not yet ready to consider.
You have provided neither evidence nor rational arguments for your position.
And for the zillionth time, you've got everything backwards. I look forward to your choice in dissecting the biggest "flaw" in "my theory" you choose. If you stay the course, you're going to learn the hard way that all the EVIDENCE supports what I've said and what you've BLINDLY BELIEVED TO BE EVIDENCE is the repository of lies you're presently unwilling to accept as a possibility.
You randomly associate various phobias to random diseases with no rhyme, reason, or explanation
Let's deconstruct your sentence. Nothing I said was RANDOM, I can assure you of that. But you didn't bother to ask me how I arrived at any of these assertions. Like a child, you flung out a barrage of "why, why why's" but you didn't really want the answer. You only wanted to make your point that I was an idiot at best, a harmful spreader of lies at worst.
various phobias
I never used the word "phobia". That's your word and your clearly incorrect INTERPRETATION of what I said. You didn't bother to seek clarification on any of it. You were solely focused on jumping to your irrational conclusions that I'm here to spread lies and harm my fellow anons. The very thing that you're doing but completely unaware of. This is PROJECTION
claim that all diseases boil down to mind games
"Mind GAMES". Another phrase I never used, therefore another attempt on your part to frame what I said as IDIOTIC AND HARMFUL. With each sentence you write, your intentions GLOW more and more. You're an unwitting establishment shill who's far too smart to have been fooled. Further, you're not interested in learning anything that doesn't match up with the establishment narrative. You've already got everything figured out, despite a complete and utter lack of ACTUAL EVIDENCE to support your unfounded position.
claim that cancer tissues are temporary and beneficial
This sentence is only partially accurate. You apparently didn't carefully read what I had to say on this topic however.
claim that viruses don't exist at all
You suffer from Steve-Kirsch-itis here. The CLAIMANT is the establishment. There claim is that muh-unicorn-viruses exist. My CLAIM is there is no evidence supporting THEIR CLAIM. Can you see the difference or do not understand the logical fallacy you invoke?
claim that the human body creates bacteria
True. Can you disprove this claim?
and claim that TB has a less than 1% mortality rate
I made no such claim. It appears you have a reading and comprehension problem and love to frame things in your own little special way so as to make yourself feel superior. You'll have to re-read that section again and see if you can correctly understand what I said.
All of this without any supporting evidence
None was requested by you. Not that you'd be able to assimilate it. Your fundamental problem is that you are quite MISTAKINGLY accepting **NON-EVIDENCE" as ACTUAL EVIDENCE. This is your core weakness.
and when opposing evidence is presented you kick and scream that it's not true because it comes from people you don't like and it contradicts your position.
You're closing strong with more PROJECTION. Well done! Can you agree that you only BELIEVE you supplied some "Opposing evidence"? Are you citing your "National Academy of Sciences" and "Smithsonian Mag" articles are evidence? Do you wish to stand on these articles are your irrefutable and unimpeachable sources of "EVIDENCE" that you are basing all your BELIEFS upon? Is this the hill you want to stand on?
The opposite is happening now. You've reversed out roles. It is you that is "kicking and screaming" because you're so bloody sure that your establishment sources of **PSEUDO-EVIDENCE"" are facts. And your incessant attacks against me are because you're clearly not ready to accept the fact that you've been fooled. This is the core problem. You're BLINDLY accepting, quite literally, WORDS being SAID by establishment authorities.
This is not the mindset of a rational adult or truth-seeker, this is the mindset of an irrational child.
How could you not close out your rant with your greatest insult yet? I would have expected nothing less from you.
As the child that you've thusly made me out to be, I hold out the olive branch and offer to walk you through how you've been fooled on one of the above major "flaws" you perceive in my position. Is your pride too strong to accept this possibility that you might be horribly wrong? I suspect it might be. But let's find out.
I'm offering to walk you through one of the dozens of lies you accept as truths with the hope that once you realize you've been fooled, you'll learn to "question everything" and accept nothing at face value any longer. And from that point on, you'll be able to do your own research, stop outsourcing your intellectual sovereignty to the authorities, and arrive at your own, evidence-based, well-reasoned and logical conclusions - despite the orthodox majority opinion. You'll be liberated from the lies henceforth.
So pick the one you're most sure you are right about; Viruses? Bacteria? Germ theory? Cancer? Conflict shocks? TB? Dis-ease causation?
I'll show you all the NON-EVIDENCE you've wrongly accepted and all the ACTUAL EVIDENCE that you presently choose to reject with the waive of your hand.
I'm here to spread wisdom and pointers to truth to like-minded people.
It's not wisdom if it contradicts reality.
Well if this is the case, it won't take us much time for you to see that I'm correct in my assertions.
Nope, because you still haven't explained why emotional states cause cancer, and you still haven't provided any evidence for your beliefs.
Nothing I said was RANDOM, I can assure you of that.
Lets review:
If she felt she becomes scared of what will happen to her, she gets bronchitis, whooping cough, throat/larynx issues. If she then has an existential/abandonment crisis on top of the the scare conflict, in time she gets pneumonia - water retention in the lungs. If she feels she can't earn a living to care for her children, she gets a starvation conflict which causes liver cancer. If she fears her husband will take the kids, she has a separation conflict and gets ductal breast cancer. If she becomes angry, she gets hepatitis. If she becomes extremely angry, she gets stomach cancer. If it turns out her husband was actually having a homosexual affair and perceives this as a "dirty conflict" and gets bladder or colon cancer. If she decides to retaliate and get revenge through a brutal fight over the property and money she gets pancreatic cancer.
Fear = bronchitis, existantial crisis = pneumonia, starvation confilict = liver cancer, separation anxiety = breast cancer, anger = hepatitis or stomach cancer (which have no relationship with each other), retaliation = pancreatic cancer. This is called randomly assigning various conditions to various emotional states or stressors. Ironically over half the conditions you listed involve neither bacteria nor viruses, so even if you were right it still wouldn't disprove germ theory.
Bonus question: Is a woman's period caused by a fear of pregnancy or fear of sexual intimacy?
True. Can you disprove this claim?
Nope, not how this works. YOU assert that the body manufactures bacteria, it's YOUR job to prove it.
I made no such claim. [That TB has a less than 1% mortality rate]
Earlier:
99% of the time, there's nothing "lethal" about this perfectly natural process. [TB]
If TB isn't lethal 99% of the time, then it's mortality rate is 1%. That's how percentages work. Or is math an establishment concoction too?
So pointing out flaws in your theory and offering counter evidence is a rant?
I'm saying that viral and bacterial pathology does a better job of articulating its ideas, making accurate predictions, and providing evidence than you have.
It's not a matter of trust, it's a matter of who has better arguments and evidence. Your model doesn't even accurately model the spread of communicable diseases because it denies that people catch bacteria from others and denies the viruses exist entirely. And I'll take the establishment's evidence over your complete lack of evidence any day, because at least they try to defend their position.
We know Covid is an engineered bioweapon because there's evidence.
We know the masking and social distance policies were ineffective and tyrannical because there's evidence
We know the Covid jabs are ineffective and have lethal side effects because there's evidence.
We know the medical establishment is wrong on the above items specifically because there's evidence. If you switch to the topic of viruses and bacteria not existing or not being pathogenic at all, that is a different set of claims, and it's your job to justify your own claims.
The establishment isn't wrong just because they're the establishment. If you're going to assert that anyone is wrong on any given subject, it's your responsibility to explain why and provide evidence. Simply screaming that they're the establishment isn't an argument, it's an inversion of the appeal to authority fallacy. Being anti-establishment for the sake of being anti-establishment isn't helpful. Such an attitude, when not based on evidence and rational arguments, is purely emotional thinking.
Why are you here? To make us look like unhinged kooks like the flat-earthers and NESARA scammers do? To kill us off with bad medical advice? I can make random accusations too.
My aim is to help people think critically about everything, and this includes analyzing evidence and arguments both for and against your current position. Only looking at "evidence" that supports your pet theory is how flat earthers get to where they are. My aim is exact high standards for evidence and arguments so that this community doesn't get to that place, as it wastes time and turns newcomers off from our movement if they see that its members ignoring basic facts and logic.
You have provided neither evidence nor rational arguments for your position. You randomly associate various phobias to random diseases with no rhyme, reason, or explanation; claim that all diseases boil down to mind games, claim that cancer tissues are temporary and beneficial, claim that the human body creates bacteria, claim that viruses don't exist at all, and claim that TB has a less than 1% mortality rate. All of this without any supporting evidence, and when opposing evidence is presented you kick and scream that it's not true because it comes from people you don't like and it contradicts your position. This is not the mindset of a rational adult or truth-seeker, this is the mindset of an irrational child.
Just to be clear, before I begin, let the record show that you're here on GA to help us by shilling the establishment medical narrative that is REPLETE with DELIBERATE FLAWS & ASSUMPTIONS, not honest errors and mistakes, that are designed to disempower humanity and keep us operating in a state of FEAR. None of which you yet REALIZE as demonstrated by your continuing attempts to uphold the establishment lamestream narrative.
I find this remarkable actually. You must be EXTREMELY NEW to GA/Q/Conspiracy Reality. Apparently I'm going to be forced to treat you like somebody from the "Democracy Now" forum or Facebook - a normie - a died-in-the-wool academic. This requires an entirely different approach. After many years of interacting with this class of consciousness, I have a near complete understanding of to proceed as such. An entirely different approach than how I interact with the general GA population.
Have you ever heard the quote: "It's easier to fool somebody than to convince them they've been fooled"? It's a highly accurate statement. Do you know who said it? Mark Twain you say? So the 99% believe. Guess what? Even with this quote, as accurate as it is, it's doubly powerful as it proves the very point it's making. Because were you to dig a little deeper you'd learn that there's no evidence that Twain ever said this. As it turns out, there are dozens upon dozens of witty, intelligent and satirical quotes attributed to Twain that simply can't be verified as being said by Twain. In short, Twain is the "witty/intelligent quote go-to-guy", having uttered so many in his career. And had you taken the time to look a little further into the matter, you'd find out that Twain has, on at least two different occasions, made statements echoing the sentiment of the quote essentially using different words.
I share all this as it makes four invaluable points that must be understood if you wish to extricate yourself from the establishment quagmire. The first is, you, me and everybody else have been FOOLED millions of times over. Second, you must also realize that nobody wants to admit they've been fooled. It's human nature. And this is why it's so much harder to convince you that you've been fooled. You demonstrate this over and over again with nearly every point you think you're making about what I've said. Ringing loudly within all your efforts to tell me I'm wrong and discredit me is the sentiment "there's no way I've been fooled because look at all the (Pseudo)-evidence I can find with a rapid-fire Google search that supports my beliefs." And thirdly, you make the cardinal sin throughout your efforts, BLINDLY BELIEVING IN AUTHORITY without making a single effort to investigate any deeper. And fourth, you make no effort to do any critical thinking before making your points. You accept what you're being told at face value.
This is the "Authority Syndrome" brainwashing that all our leftist, normie, NPC friends are fully mesmerized by. And extricating them from it has thus far been near-impossible to achieve.
Another thing I find quite fascinating is trying to understand what you think I'm doing here. It appears you are under the impression that I "made everything up" on my own as you continue to refer to "my theory". You also clearly think I'm a lunatic of sorts, sharing highly damaging and detrimental health and well-being information in order to cause harm and injury to my fellow humanity. Thus, in your mind, you've branded me an actual THREAT to your very well-being and safety. This you've made quite clear.
I find your position astonishingly naive and completely backwards as it's made abundantly clear on a daily basis here on GA that in reality, in truth and in all fact, it is the ESTABLISHMENT MEDICAL COMMUNITY that has proven to be the greatest threat to humanity's health and well-being. There's zero chance you're not aware of this frequenting this board.
This is inexcusable ignorance on your part which makes me question your intentions all the more. Now I do understand, many people here think it's just the recent Covid narrative and poisonous jabs when the establishment lost its way, not yet aware of how long the lies and deceptions have been going on. But this group of people approach what I say with curiosity and questions, not deliberate attempts to cast me as a fool, and worse, accuse me of spreading information that is detrimental to their health.
You're the first of this kind I have encountered. And make no mistake, you've cast me in this light of being "the real bad guy out to harm people" with everything you've said thus far. Let's not kid ourselves.
Let's use clear language as we proceed. Would you agree that you BELIEVE you pointed out some flaws in "My theory"? The only person thus far crediting you with pointing out any flaws is you. Right?
So I'm going to give you the opportunity to pick the most definitive "flaw" you BELIEVE you've pointed out and we'll dissect it from beginning to end. We simply don't have time to handle each one right now due to your present state of authority-mesmerization-syndrome. Hopefully, having walked you through your favorite one, you can then do your own due diligence and unwind the other points you think you've made.
So pick your favorite "flaw" and we'll do a deep dive together. That is, if you're ready to learn how you've been fooled.
Then you're deeply lost in the establishment, academic deception. This is the FUNDAMENTAL problem you have - blind belief in authority. As the ENTIRETY of viral and bacterial pathology is a LIE. Not some of it. Not a few parts of it. The whole she-bang, from beginning to end. The very fact that Koch's Postulates have never been satisfied should be all I need to say to prove my point. But unfortunately, due to your BELIEFS, it could take us quite some time to show you how you, and all the virologists and bacteriologists out there have been quite easily FOOLED, and why it's so hard to now convince them of such.
Is this your favorite "flaw" you wish to do a deep-dive on?
So you're now on record stating the establishment medical academics have Better arguments and evidence. Perhaps you'd prefer we dissect this irrational belief system flaw of yours? I can assure you, the exact opposite is the truth. Myself and thousands of others earnestly looked for these "better arguments and evidence" for well over a year. We couldn't find a shred of it. Not even a single point we could give them credit for. All we found were lies, deceptions and brainwashees blindly believing authorities.
Your thinking is backwards and this is perhaps the biggest hurdle we have to overcome. Do you believe Unicorns exist? If not, then you "deny they exist" which implies you're at fault, you're the "bad guy", you're the "denier". You cast aspersions in the wrong direction with this line of reasoning.
Further, your sentence IMPLICITLY ASSERTS the existence of such a thing known as a "Communicable Dis-ease". To assert that which has yet to be scientifically proven is what you've done in several of your points thus far. You've got the cart ahead of the horse. You're miles downstream from the lies and deceptions.
And yet again, asserting what is unproven. You're a blind believer in the authoritative narrative. The only "We" in your sentence are the blind believers. Considering this is a dialogue between two people, this is a remarkably IGNORANT and ARROGANT statement to make as the only "we" in this context is you and I. And I can assure you, I have not seen a shred of scientific evidence demonstrating there is such a THING as "Covid (SARS-CoV2)". But you go one step further downstream in your false claim. Not only do you assert there is such a "thing", but you go one step further and also falsely claim this "thing" is a "bioweapon". All without a shred of actual proof.
Do you see how you're failing to make your points on all counts? Is this the "flaw in my theory" you wish to do a deep dive on? You've got to pick only one as it's obviously going to take a great deal of time and effort to deconstruct the myriad of FALSE BELIEFS you hold in your mind as "truths".
Damn straight it is. But you aren't interested in understanding this. Because you assert again and again and again that I can't possibly achieve this. Your mind is closed. You've clearly demonstrated this with every statement you make. After all "we know Covid is an engineered bioweapon", right?
Amidst the myriad of logical fallacies you are trying to wield against me, this is yet another; the "reverse proof of claim logical fallacy". There's a maxim of law that states: "He who makes the claim bears the burden of proof". And in all we're discussing, the CLAIMANT is undeniably our trillion-dollar medical establishment cabal. So is this the "flaw" you wish to investigate? That you believe the establishment can support their claim that viruses exist or bacteria are pathogenic?
LOL. You've got everything backwards yet again. The problem we're going to have here is that you don't realize that what you have accepted as "evidence" of your BELIEFS is anything but. It's going to be a long unwind to demonstrate because it's clear you aren't yet ready to accept the possibility that you've been *FOOLED yet. This you make clear again and again.
You'd think after all we've been through the past 3 years, you'd be open to what I say and doing some investigation of your own. But nope, you're actually trapped in this space where they only pulled off the great Covid lie recently. That it took them over a hundred years to pull off this lie you are entirely unwilling to accept as a possibility. In your mind, it's simply IMPOSSIBLE that this is the case. This is what you think -> "there's no way they could have been lying to us all this time about "muh germs". This is your resounding stance. IMPOSSIBLE. You overtly admit to this again and again. There's just no way you could have been fooled, is there?
Who said it was? It is you that builds the strawman arguments. You're projecting all the time as well. By your name-calling and implications about what I've shared and my intentions, it is you that has injected "emotional thinking" into this discourse.
Not once did you say - "well, what you say is certainly interesting, what led you to these conclusions"? Not even once. All you've done this far is attack, attack and attack what I've said from a deeply EMOTIONAL state of FEAR.
Out of space...
Yet you have failed to show one instance where germ theory or viral pathology are incorrect, and your own theory has zero predictive power.
Ah, the old argument of "my opponent disagrees with me, therefore they're an idiot". Nice ad hominem. I've been in the Q space for at least 2 years now. So what? Seniority does not magically bestow legitimacy.
Asking for evidence and logic equals blind belief in authority.... right. Whatever you say.
But the idea that Covid is a bioweapon runs counter to the dominant medical establishment. So then I am not blindly believing authority, if I was I wouldn't be on GAW in the first place.
I never said you couldn't, I said you haven't. Not once have explained how emotional states or phobias trigger illnesses, you just assert that this is the case and expect me to believe you because you're anti establishment, which ironically is itself a call to blind belief in authority.
Being a multi-trillion dollar industry is neither a crime nor a flaw. If so, then the scam artists who push flat earth, NESARA, and germ theory are guilty of the exact same thing on a smaller scale.
You are pushing the claim that the evidence for germ theory is bunk. That's YOUR claim, which means YOU have to defend it.
I am open to those who make reasonable arguments and put forward evidence, you have done neither. I'm still waiting for which strain of Hepatitis excessive anger causes, and how the heck an emotional state causes an blood-borne pathogen/STD.
Pointing out potential problems and lack of evidence is a golden opportunity for you to explain how you arrived at your conclusions. Yet you have failed to do so; you have only doubled down on your assertions with no explanation and failed to address the contradictory evidence that I provided. Putting your theory under scrutiny is not an attack, it is how ideas are forged and refined. All theories should be subject to scrutiny, and if you view that as an attack, all it shows is that you are the one who is afraid of criticism.
Continuing...
I'm here to spread wisdom and pointers to truth to like-minded people. You're clearly the one spreading 'bad medical advice" by continuously shilling for the establishment medical cartel. But obviously, you don't realize this which is the most frightening aspect of it all. As with the vast majority of our profoundly miseducated "doctors", you all actually think you're "doing the right thing" by spreading the BELIEFS you mistakenly accept as "truths". Because again, it's absolutely IMPOSSIBLE that you all could have been fooled, right?
Well if this is the case, it won't take us much time for you to see that I'm correct in my assertions. The fundamental problem you're going to have is coming to terms with the fact that what you accept as "evidence" is anything but.
Dude, you're suffering deeply from multiple CIA-psyop-brainwashing syndromes. Just stop now. You're embarrassing yourself. We've got too much to contend with already. You're a blind-believer-in-authority on steroids.
You're the biggest "turn off" to "our movement" I've yet to encounter here, and I've been here since the beginning. So congratulations on winning that award. Can't you see you're 100% SHILLING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT with every single point you try to make? If you can't see this you're in one heckuva quagmire that's going to be extremely tough for you to get out of. And frankly, you're a tremendous detriment to "our movement". Because "our movement" is going to deconstruct and decimate the entire establishment narrative which is built entirely on LIES AND DECEPTIONS. And there are no exceptions. The FOUNDATION of every major institution wielding power and control over us is lies, lies and more lies. A fact you are clearly not yet ready to consider.
And for the zillionth time, you've got everything backwards. I look forward to your choice in dissecting the biggest "flaw" in "my theory" you choose. If you stay the course, you're going to learn the hard way that all the EVIDENCE supports what I've said and what you've BLINDLY BELIEVED TO BE EVIDENCE is the repository of lies you're presently unwilling to accept as a possibility.
Let's deconstruct your sentence. Nothing I said was RANDOM, I can assure you of that. But you didn't bother to ask me how I arrived at any of these assertions. Like a child, you flung out a barrage of "why, why why's" but you didn't really want the answer. You only wanted to make your point that I was an idiot at best, a harmful spreader of lies at worst.
I never used the word "phobia". That's your word and your clearly incorrect INTERPRETATION of what I said. You didn't bother to seek clarification on any of it. You were solely focused on jumping to your irrational conclusions that I'm here to spread lies and harm my fellow anons. The very thing that you're doing but completely unaware of. This is PROJECTION
"Mind GAMES". Another phrase I never used, therefore another attempt on your part to frame what I said as IDIOTIC AND HARMFUL. With each sentence you write, your intentions GLOW more and more. You're an unwitting establishment shill who's far too smart to have been fooled. Further, you're not interested in learning anything that doesn't match up with the establishment narrative. You've already got everything figured out, despite a complete and utter lack of ACTUAL EVIDENCE to support your unfounded position.
This sentence is only partially accurate. You apparently didn't carefully read what I had to say on this topic however.
You suffer from Steve-Kirsch-itis here. The CLAIMANT is the establishment. There claim is that muh-unicorn-viruses exist. My CLAIM is there is no evidence supporting THEIR CLAIM. Can you see the difference or do not understand the logical fallacy you invoke?
True. Can you disprove this claim?
I made no such claim. It appears you have a reading and comprehension problem and love to frame things in your own little special way so as to make yourself feel superior. You'll have to re-read that section again and see if you can correctly understand what I said.
None was requested by you. Not that you'd be able to assimilate it. Your fundamental problem is that you are quite MISTAKINGLY accepting **NON-EVIDENCE" as ACTUAL EVIDENCE. This is your core weakness.
You're closing strong with more PROJECTION. Well done! Can you agree that you only BELIEVE you supplied some "Opposing evidence"? Are you citing your "National Academy of Sciences" and "Smithsonian Mag" articles are evidence? Do you wish to stand on these articles are your irrefutable and unimpeachable sources of "EVIDENCE" that you are basing all your BELIEFS upon? Is this the hill you want to stand on?
The opposite is happening now. You've reversed out roles. It is you that is "kicking and screaming" because you're so bloody sure that your establishment sources of **PSEUDO-EVIDENCE"" are facts. And your incessant attacks against me are because you're clearly not ready to accept the fact that you've been fooled. This is the core problem. You're BLINDLY accepting, quite literally, WORDS being SAID by establishment authorities.
How could you not close out your rant with your greatest insult yet? I would have expected nothing less from you.
As the child that you've thusly made me out to be, I hold out the olive branch and offer to walk you through how you've been fooled on one of the above major "flaws" you perceive in my position. Is your pride too strong to accept this possibility that you might be horribly wrong? I suspect it might be. But let's find out.
I'm offering to walk you through one of the dozens of lies you accept as truths with the hope that once you realize you've been fooled, you'll learn to "question everything" and accept nothing at face value any longer. And from that point on, you'll be able to do your own research, stop outsourcing your intellectual sovereignty to the authorities, and arrive at your own, evidence-based, well-reasoned and logical conclusions - despite the orthodox majority opinion. You'll be liberated from the lies henceforth.
So pick the one you're most sure you are right about; Viruses? Bacteria? Germ theory? Cancer? Conflict shocks? TB? Dis-ease causation?
I'll show you all the NON-EVIDENCE you've wrongly accepted and all the ACTUAL EVIDENCE that you presently choose to reject with the waive of your hand.
Are you up for the challenge?
It's not wisdom if it contradicts reality.
Nope, because you still haven't explained why emotional states cause cancer, and you still haven't provided any evidence for your beliefs.
Lets review:
Fear = bronchitis, existantial crisis = pneumonia, starvation confilict = liver cancer, separation anxiety = breast cancer, anger = hepatitis or stomach cancer (which have no relationship with each other), retaliation = pancreatic cancer. This is called randomly assigning various conditions to various emotional states or stressors. Ironically over half the conditions you listed involve neither bacteria nor viruses, so even if you were right it still wouldn't disprove germ theory.
Bonus question: Is a woman's period caused by a fear of pregnancy or fear of sexual intimacy?
Nope, not how this works. YOU assert that the body manufactures bacteria, it's YOUR job to prove it.
Earlier:
If TB isn't lethal 99% of the time, then it's mortality rate is 1%. That's how percentages work. Or is math an establishment concoction too?