Did you build it? The designers would be stupid to not put at least basic cameras and signals recon on the LARGEST satellite constellation by far ever created. Expand your thinking.
The region has so much radar coverage, this isn't even a need. These are easily tracked, with little public outrage in having them "crash". You can be certain the west use them very aggressively.
Whoever controls starlink knows where every last one of these reaper drones are when operational
THIS is important
Also, the Russians knew exactly where the thing was, apparently. Kek.
There is so much radar coverage (with 500-600km range) that any MQ-9 will light up anytime.
Spaceforce controls all military satellite communications so…
It's public information that they can track objects the size of baseballs.
So to confirm, they DEFINITELY don't know where pedo Joe's testicle are?
Confirmed missing
These drones do not run on Starlink
Starlink can see and hear them is my point
Starlink has no eyes, and has ears only for its own network signals.
Did you build it? The designers would be stupid to not put at least basic cameras and signals recon on the LARGEST satellite constellation by far ever created. Expand your thinking.
Maybe no eyes at 'optical' wavelengths...
It was not claimed that they run on Starlink. Only that Starlink could facilitate their tracking.
The region has so much radar coverage, this isn't even a need. These are easily tracked, with little public outrage in having them "crash". You can be certain the west use them very aggressively.