I like the future proves past stuff. The 1776 (Queen thing) and 1984 (Trump's supposed arrest next Tuesday) have my attention, too.
I know we are watching a movie.
What are some plausible scripts? (I am not asking for dates).
Mine is this: Trump is arrested. The Awakening accelerates. There are riots because the opportunity is ripe. Nat Guard is activated in many states. Somehow we get to Martial Law. Indictments unsealed. Perps rounded up. The real trials begin.
Basic premise is this: arresting Trump is the equivalent of throwing the first punch (everything else has been posturing). Now the gloves come off and the stage is truly set because everyone will be watching, and under Martial Law even the MSM will be taken over so the people can see and hear the truth.
This happens over the course of a few months. Economy tanks. Market tanks. Banking system breaks. Life gets scary, but it's all blamed on the FJB regime.
And then we rebuild after peace, truth and patriotism are restored.
The end.
Reading the Q posts can only get you so far because they don't help with specific predictions by design.
If the white hats successfully telegraphed to us how the plan works, then the black hats could work it out and or see our analysis.
Perhaps I am just saying this because I'm not a very good Q post analyst.
Anyway, what you say could very likely occur. Arrests are important, but redpilling and awakening is the main thing. humankind must free itself from the cabal and have inbuilt awareness and vigilance, even while life is improving for us in ways we can't currently imagine.
Agreed. My biggest concern is that the cabal is not dumb and will continue to distort at every chance it gets, thus continuing to keep many, many people asleep.
Even if there are only 5 percent who never wake up, that's a shit ton of people. That's about 15 million people in the US. That's a lot of potential bad hombres.
One good thing I have noticed with my very intelligent wife is she is very much a herd thinker by her current habit and has actually said to me that my understanding about the world must be inaccurate because none of her friends share my opinion and a minority opinion is likely to be wrong.
I understand this as a short cut heuristic, but we know it can't be relied on in a world with such brainwashing.
Nevertheless, she will change her opinion when the MSM and the balance of her friends change theirs and she will maintain that she was always right and that i was not right to think what I do because i was right too early and therefore wrong. no matter the details, her herd heuristic for working out what is true will bring her in line with us in time. I expect this is true for most people
My wife is like this sometimes. I'll say, "X", and she'll roll her eyes and say, "No, Y", and like 10 years later I'll hear her say, "X". I'll then say, "When I said X way back when, you said Y.", and then she'll get upset at me. It's one of the few things that cause real tension between us, because she takes it as criticism and she doesn't handle that very well.
Mine is completely asleep, so I don't even bother with her. She'll just have to see it for herself, while I make arrangements in the background. Everything is "just your opinion" to her. She did ask me what I thought about Trump's indictment, and I just gave her my boilerplate answer: "Now, watch what happens." When she asked me to elaborate, I refused. She knows that I don't operate on foolish, misguided pride, so she doesn't bother to try to push any buttons with me, although she'll make certain comments on occasion.
Lol…sounds very familiar. If it comes from me, it goes in one ear and out the other almost as a rule. She has a friend who is at leased somewhat based, somewhat of a critical thinker, and who for whatever reason, my wife looks up to and low key seeks approval of. The “cool chick” of her group of friends. From time to time she’ll dish out little bite sized redpills that my wife can 1. hear, and 2. digest. She’ll come to me beaming about how Lindsay is so badass and Lindsay thinks this and Lindsay said that and I’ll think “yeah I tried to tell you that already years/months/weeks/days ago and you essentially gave me a ‘Mm hm yeah that’s great honey. Do these jeans make my ass look fat?’ However I just say “Lindsay’s right. I like Lindsay”, because if I point out that it (and much more) came from me first it just shuts the whole thing down. Definitely makes my eye twitch but hey whatever helps in waking her sleeping brain up is welcome by me.
Kek, mine neither!
Managers don't take criticism well as a rule, they see it as a threat to their authority!
If she doesn't like thinking that you are right and she is wrong then don't tell her. Keep your rightness to yourself and let her learn from true life as it happens. I've learned not to tell my son what he doesn't want to know. Except in cases of him losing all his stock market money. I tell him that the crash is coming for the dollar and then he reproaches me later and says he's missing the boom and it's my fault ;) His bible is the WSJ - I can't fight with that.
"I told you so-ism" does make people mad, don't ya know?
I think you just described so many more people than Anons like to think exist.
Honestly, I dont think the herds will shift their opinions significantly until their favorite MSM personalities are totally discredited. That's one of the things I have been hoping will happen... it has been happening, but there are so many more to go. And, the discrediting needs to be really egregious at this point for it to stick in our desensitized world.
Btw, I think confusion and desensitization are the key tools of the cabal that allow them to continuously keep people asleep.
I think the white hats have had close control of the MSM for some time now, perhaps through a variety of means. You can see it clearly with Twitter and maybe Facebook, but maybe it isn't so clear with the left leaning MSM.
I think that the white hats taper in the awakening to the normies in a controlled fashion and maybe take feedback readings using surveillance like social media trends.
I think it's in hand. What do you think?
In cases of people like Anderson Cooper and Rachel Maddow and Don Lemon. They probably do have to be discredited rather than have their message adjusted. They are stiff idealogues and discrediting them is part of the awakening.
"Right too early." That's perfect!
Thanks, It's my own line, I use it for this type of conversation.
Didn't you just describe what happened with Scott Adams? His well worked out analysis was "right." The conspiracy theorists were wrong even though it turned out they were right. They were wrong because they did the short cut heuristic thing and not a logical analysis. He even used the word "heuristic." Are you Scott Adams?
Clott adams Still refuses to admit he was way wrong
Kek, I've been here at GAW looking more or less awake for more than 2 years. Of course I'm not Scott Adams!
This is 100% why we are where we are.
They are so terrified of being kicked out of the herd and shunned that they will do ANYTHING to stay with it - including shunning family members who refuse to follow that same herd.
They have to shun you because if you go against the group and get shunned, they might get shunned, too, through guilt by association. And we've seen how fast The Herd is to shun outsiders (non-vaxxxers) and rip them to shreds.
It's been utterly shocking to learn that so many folks that I thought were strong, independent free thinkers instantly jumped to Stay With the Herd the minute a Scary Thing happened - the minute the newsreaders told them to.
Never would have believed it if I had not seen it for myself.
I have a sign on the back of my car which says "Don't trust the vax" and a little sheep with a big blue syringe in it's arse.
My wife won't get into my car in case she is seen in it.
There will have to be a careful calibration to make sure there's always a group to blame failure on, so that those in power are never the reason. They are, but that's not the point. They cant get rich without screwing us over.
Great observation.