As we were building the site we noticed that many of the posts we scraped from other Q sites were missing images from anons in the "references". We have hand scraped the minimized versions of these images from the archives to help provide the full context of the Q posts. The following drops were affected:
Some drops have been significantly enriched as part of this process. For example, post 2052 is a dead link on most (all?) other Q archives that I'm aware of but now a replacement video is shown on anontools.xyz.
Post 392, which has a lot of Heidi Fleiss info, was significantly enriched to mirror the original content.
Post 2086 renders the Trump sack video which is too good to leave missing.
Post 365 got some special treatment because it's the only Q post that uses the spoiler tag. It renders correctly now so that anons may fully ponder its meaning as it was originally written.
Post 1277 had a great reference to Crowley's "Moonchild" novel that was lost and has now been restored.
Screencaps of Twitter links from qagg.news are now referenced. These backfill deleted Tweets that are fairly frequently referenced.
The search has also been updated with new options and to handle special characters much better. For example, on most sites an ampersand must be searched for as "&" (the html encoded version). On anontools.xyz you can now plugin queries like "/" and "& defend" and get the expected drops.
Pinning behavior also changed to be more useful. When all your search filters are cleared, only the pinned drops will be displayed. This allows you to select N drops and display only those N drops on the clock.
I think that in conjunction with being able to exclude "references" makes the clock visualization tool much more useful.
This is a Q drop site that we run. It's an alternative to qposts.online, qanon.pub, or qresear.ch. It has an integrated Q clock and proof drawing tool (Excalidraw).
I'm letting people here know there's been a significant update to the site. How these drop tools behave and what they show can affect an anon's digs.
I like it. Would you be able to add an option to highlight the searched text in the drops that show up? Also, are you able to search for multiple keywords?
I'll see what I can do on the word highlights first, it's a bit easier.
I prototyped a google style version of the search earlier (that would tokenize words and such), and also a Lucene version, but didn't find it very useful. It also conflicts a bit with the highlight words (highlight words becomes a bit harder to implement once I start allowing richer search options).
If you have a multi-stage dig right now what I recommend is querying the first term, 'pinning' the relevant results with the pin button, then running the second query. Copying drops to Excalidraw is also an option.
fed.wiki.org (by the original inventor of the wiki) puts a search engine on the front end and it works well. The text of all the Q drops isn’t a huge download size...something to consider.
I wanted to see what the reference was from "Post 1277" to the moonchild novel so typed 1277 into the searchbox labelled "Drop."
It found a post/drop with 1277 in the top right corner but it is nothing about a moonchild. But then I searched for the text string "moonchild" and this time I got 1276 (which is about a moonchild) and also 1277 in which the moonchild string is not present.
The reason for the "curation" initiative was the sheer quantity of missing data on the other tools. Dead Youtube links, dead Twitter links, dead 4chan image links, broken search results, etc. It can really throw a dig off when something you search for is there but the tool shows it's not!
Also when Qagg went down there was an incredible sense of responsibility to help fill that gap in the tooling. Too many tools is a much better situation than too few.
https://anontools.xyz
As we were building the site we noticed that many of the posts we scraped from other Q sites were missing images from anons in the "references". We have hand scraped the minimized versions of these images from the archives to help provide the full context of the Q posts. The following drops were affected:
538, 637, 654, 690, 773, 774, 817, 818, 1005, 1006, 1026, 1075, 1113, 1137, 1165, 1189, 1230, 1277, 1371, 1394, 1428, 1435, 1504, 1506, 1583, 1584, 1638, 1727, 1760, 1782, 1827, 1852, 1911, 2024, 2051, 2052, 2086, 2143, 2192, 2387, 2421, 2515, 2734, 2760, 2763, 2800, 2826, 2998, 3141, 3152, 3335, 3340, 3431, 3552, 3756, 3809, 4241, 4320, 4322, 4497
Some drops have been significantly enriched as part of this process. For example, post 2052 is a dead link on most (all?) other Q archives that I'm aware of but now a replacement video is shown on anontools.xyz.
Post 392, which has a lot of Heidi Fleiss info, was significantly enriched to mirror the original content.
Post 2086 renders the Trump sack video which is too good to leave missing.
Post 365 got some special treatment because it's the only Q post that uses the spoiler tag. It renders correctly now so that anons may fully ponder its meaning as it was originally written.
Post 1277 had a great reference to Crowley's "Moonchild" novel that was lost and has now been restored.
Screencaps of Twitter links from qagg.news are now referenced. These backfill deleted Tweets that are fairly frequently referenced.
The search has also been updated with new options and to handle special characters much better. For example, on most sites an ampersand must be searched for as "&" (the html encoded version). On anontools.xyz you can now plugin queries like "/" and "& defend" and get the expected drops.
Pinning behavior also changed to be more useful. When all your search filters are cleared, only the pinned drops will be displayed. This allows you to select N drops and display only those N drops on the clock.
I think that in conjunction with being able to exclude "references" makes the clock visualization tool much more useful.
Can someone explain this to me?
... and to me as well?
This is a Q drop site that we run. It's an alternative to qposts.online, qanon.pub, or qresear.ch. It has an integrated Q clock and proof drawing tool (Excalidraw).
I'm letting people here know there's been a significant update to the site. How these drop tools behave and what they show can affect an anon's digs.
You are one sharp Pepe! Thanks merf! 👏💚
Beautiful thank you for your efforts
this is awesome u/merf/ thanks
Do you know which site it is that has the “Answers” tab on posts that have questions on them? I’ve looked at that one before but I can’t find it now.
https://qanon.pub
Thanks! I had checked that site before but apparently I just didn’t look at posts that had answers posted.
I like it. Would you be able to add an option to highlight the searched text in the drops that show up? Also, are you able to search for multiple keywords?
I'll see what I can do on the word highlights first, it's a bit easier.
I prototyped a google style version of the search earlier (that would tokenize words and such), and also a Lucene version, but didn't find it very useful. It also conflicts a bit with the highlight words (highlight words becomes a bit harder to implement once I start allowing richer search options).
If you have a multi-stage dig right now what I recommend is querying the first term, 'pinning' the relevant results with the pin button, then running the second query. Copying drops to Excalidraw is also an option.
fed.wiki.org (by the original inventor of the wiki) puts a search engine on the front end and it works well. The text of all the Q drops isn’t a huge download size...something to consider.
Ok highlighting is finally implemented. Give it a run and let me know how it behaves.
It was a nightmare getting some of the edge cases like:
Q+
/\
/_\
spoiler
But they look good now.
Very nice!! Thanks!
Noice!
Does "drop" mean the same as "post"?
I wanted to see what the reference was from "Post 1277" to the moonchild novel so typed 1277 into the searchbox labelled "Drop."
It found a post/drop with 1277 in the top right corner but it is nothing about a moonchild. But then I searched for the text string "moonchild" and this time I got 1276 (which is about a moonchild) and also 1277 in which the moonchild string is not present.
What have I misunderstood?
Keep clicking the green links that start with ">>". Those are references to other messages.
By default the search includes referenced posts but doesn't show them all because of the visual overload of it.
#1277 contains a pile of referenced posts (probably the most of all the Q posts).
I want to add an "expand all references" feature at some point for just this scenario..
EDIT: yeah and I use "drop" and "post" interchangeably.
This is awesomely comprehensive! Thank you, u/merf!
Whether I use mobile or desktop, this is what I get:
On my tablet's Samsung browser, all I get is 'loading..." in the upper left corner, but it never loads.
On the (out of date) Chrome browser, I get a dark screen and this message:
I'm technologically-challenged and I have no clue what that means.
It looks like a great site, I wish I could see it! :(
wot
I'll see what I can do. I think maybe offering up a git repo file at:
https://anontools.xyz/src.zip
...would be a good start. The users could just point to the existing CDN for the images.
EDIT: updated to src.zip
This is all excellent! I thought you were kinda done with it but this is exciting to hear that you’ve been actively developing it!
The reason for the "curation" initiative was the sheer quantity of missing data on the other tools. Dead Youtube links, dead Twitter links, dead 4chan image links, broken search results, etc. It can really throw a dig off when something you search for is there but the tool shows it's not!
Also when Qagg went down there was an incredible sense of responsibility to help fill that gap in the tooling. Too many tools is a much better situation than too few.
I got that the page could not be found
It's gonna be a bit. I'll ping you both back directly when it's ready.
It's available. Written in node/react. Could be a bit raw to get going but probably not too bad. Just need to se the CDN env var.
It's available.