Meanwhile in York, UK…
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (47)
sorted by:
I think it is time to do away with the Monarchy. Why should they become RICH on the peoples' money and jewels. I think it should be a thing of the past. Give the people back their jewels and castles and pay off their countries debts.
I'm glad to see frens here have this attitude. It is precisely what my lefty wife says so it's common ground.
Royals are usually descended from the meanest, most ruthless elites, that's how they got to the top of the pile. I can't understand people who revere them.
The Brits love their pecking order I suppose.
I'm glad that I have someone to agree with me. You have a Parliament and a Prime Minister. That should be all you need to run your country. I think the Monarchy is just for show and to flaunt riches they've taken from your people. This is my opinion my friend. Hope you feel the same about Parliament.
I actually think they COULD serve a purpose but they don't
A humble kind King a man of the people, could keep the government in line
Just a shame we've not had one of those for a long time
Also, our current royals are not the legitimate heirs to the throne, the true king lives in New Zealand.
I heard that too. It seems no one is legitimate anymore. There's always someone wanting to take something that doesn't rightfully belong to them.
Yes, it has been that way for a long time, but I have faith that humanity is pushing in the right direction. They're running out of time and they know it.
Uhtred the Bold, Aeflread Lady of Mercia, and William Wallace’s spirits are flowing through our brothers and sisters in the UK. Freedom is Destiny!
It's a money thing. It would cost to much to rename all the navy ships. No more H.M.S. in the ship name. Paint is not cheap!😉
we can just reassign the meaning of HMS
"Huge Metal Ship"
Yeah, that's true actually!
Idk if anything given how corrupt and unfixable the legislature is in the US i'd say it's a good argument for monarchy.
You can have ours! Kek!
Well no the idea would be to get Trump or someone Trump like in there. But then if things go awry it would be a constitutional monarchy, so we'd keep a 2nd amendment equivalent. Then there's only one problem to "fix"
I just don't quite recommend it. I think the US republic has a better foundation. You just need to drain the swamp and move the capital city.
"You just need to drain the swamp and move the capital city."
"Just?"
Work in progress,
complicated business!
Sometimes I think the founding fathers might have been too optimistic about the chances of keeping the public awake and engaged in perpetuity.
The US population is about to get a lesson they'll never forget IMO.
Exactly, they were quite lucky with Babeth but that guy is only despised.
Look in Thailand, when Bhumibol died, his son had to work his ass off to have the people forget about how spoiled he was.
Ha. And it served him right. These people don't know how the other half lives. Probably never had their hands dirty or callused a day in their lives. Wait until their hands are blistered, burst, and hardened and then they can come back and tell me what it felt like.
worlds wealthiest welfare family.
I think they should have the work for welfare program, don't you?
Wait till they find out about the "pope"
Brilliant! Nasty toad-like creature is not my king!
What would be involved legally in dumping the monarchy?
Don't know about legally, but lead and fire would probably work in the less-than-legal route.
Which is why the elites took the lead away from the British people.
Look at those low energy retards is yellow vests.
They look like they are having fun - an easy assignment for a change.
Easy pay check
there is but only ONE King... & these monarchies ain't even close to Him.
Hey I know we don't like Charles, but still least there's a distinctive as to why this is more retarded than not my president. HE IS THE KING of the country, no dispute. So not my king poster is just retarded because the peasants don't get a say in that choice.
Actually, he is NOT the rightful heir to the British Crown. It was stolen from this evil, nazi family from Transylvania. They even changed their name to sound more British. They are descended from German / Vlad the Impaler blood lines.
Are you ready to storm Windsor palace to put the "rightful" monarch on the throne. If not Charles is the king. I don't like him, and I think the royals have been a sellout group, but he's a more legitimate king than biden is legitimate president.
Why would I be "ready to storm Windsor Palace" when I'm not a British citizen? I'm merely stating facts. The Queen was locked out of Windsor Palace for several years before her death, she spent her last years at Balmoral. They are not the rightful heirs of the throne. I don't care what they do over there, it's their business how they deal with Transylvanians stealing their wealth.
Btw when was the queen locked out of the castle, except when she was dead in the hospital lol. Like u got any articles or something about this, just more curious than anything. I would think a secret king type deal would be much more noticeable than it has been
Here's an article, msm so yada yada msm normie talk, but on the chan boards we were getting into reasons why she left her usual residences. Anons were even posting old Carol Burnette clips of the Queen and her disgusting pos spouse being locked out, and we all had a good time. https://inews.co.uk/news/queen-live-where-buckingham-palace-windsor-balmoral-castle-residence-1835636 I'm sure there are numerous others, I used a quick brave search and this was the first article that popped up.
The "storm the castle" phrase is figurative of speech meant with dry humor. And I'm aware of the transylvania lineage. Now I'm not entirely sure what details you have that shows the throne was usurped or when it happened but if we are going off of an issue that's 300 years old I think any "rightful" heirs are heirs no more IMO, just too much time has passed unless ppl want to get behind a new royal family kind of deal.
Us plebs get to have a say 'cos the Queen sold us down the river. You can say it was her advisors, corrupt Pilgrim society, but it happened on her watch. She signed away our sovereignty for dirty European cash.
Hey fine by me if you're ready to storm Windsor palace. My point being is that he is the legitimate King. The line of succession have been reaffirmed for like 70 years at this point. Unlike biden who was s'elected' in the middle of the night with very questionable ballot drops at 2am after the polls closed. You guys at least have a legit gripe against a legit figure head, unlike us here who had our legit figure head ripped from us through fraudulent means.
Au Contraire, mine theWOknessHurts. The Plantagenet Heir to the British throne Simon Abney-Hastings, the 15th Earl of Loudon is a landowner who lives in Australia, has been invited to the coronation, and will be participating in an official capacity as part of the ceremony. He is one of 13 people to do so (take THAT Royal Dukes) He will be keeping (presenting etc.) the Golden Spurs of office.
FYI Golden Spurs are part of the crown jewels. Gold spurs were first included among the English coronation ornaments in 1189, at the coronation of Richard I (the Lionheart). They symbolized knighthood, and their use in the coronation ritual derives directly from the ceremony of creating a knight. These spurs were made in 1661 for Charles II but were altered in 1820 for George IV, when new textiles replaced the earlier buckles and straps.
The spurs form part of the coronation ceremony in which the sovereign is invested with the ornaments or symbols of royalty. Traditionally the spurs were fastened to the sovereign's feet, but since the Restoration they have simply been held to the ankles of kings, or in the case of queens regnant, presented and then placed on the altar. After the investiture the sovereign is crowned.
I'm a tad bit confused my fren. Is what your saying that this Austrailian land owner is actually the king but these ppl like "King Charles" just a pupet for the real royals or something type deal? I mean it would make sense as to why they actually haven't had a coronation for Charles yet, but that's the only thing that makes sense to me
Not claiming it makes a lot of sense, Google is your friend there. Charles III seems to support the claim, and has invited him into the coronation ceremony. Simon Abney-Hastings, 15th Earl of Loudoun
This may help.
The guest list of this weekend's coronation of King Charles III includes an Australian who may have a claim on the throne. Simon Abney-Hastings is the earl of Loudon. Some historians say there are questions about the legitimacy of the birth of King Edward IV way back in the 15th century, and that the line of succession should have gone instead through Abney-Hasting's ancestors, making him the rightful ruler. But there will be no coup because the earl says it's all cool.
Also btw if your saying this hastings person is the rightful king, would that mean they're a descendant of Harold hastings? If sooo that argument is completely moot due to Norman invasion
No, I'm not claiming Harold Hastings. His lineage is available via Google.
King Charles III has invited him to the coronation, and to be presenting part of the Crown Jewels.