All candidates who want to run sign up to run in a particular party's primary.
The winner of that primary advances to the general election where each party has one candidate.
The threat of being primaried, means they will make sure you lose your first election against members of your own party and you will never advance to the general election to win the seat.
I am not American but as I understand their system, candidates are selected by running a pre-election called a primary. So being "primaried" means you will need to be re-selecetd by your party before you can be allowed to stand again.
If you are not "primaried" you can just stand again without undergoing the pre-selection process.
Think of the primary as narrowing the field of candidates for a party. Going into the primary there are for instance 5 candidates all vying to be the democrat nominee. This includes the incumbent, if any.
Democrats have their primary. Republicans have their primary. This election may be on the same day, but as a voter, I can only vote for the republican slate of candidates OR the democrat slate of candidates for the primary, not both (at least thats how it is in my state). Republicans and democrats do not run against each other in the primaries.
The primary election is held. Only one candidate wins the election for their party and is put forward in the election process as that party's nominee.
To be "primaried", you are the incumbent that lost your bid to be a candidate for re-election. This is the main way this term is used.
All other candidates that lost in the primary are referred to as simply having lost not "primaried". Though technically, one could use the term for any candidate that lost in the primary, the impact of the term is generally used for incumbent candidates.
This happened to Liz Cheney as she did not win in the primary election even though she was the incumbent. This was quite the upset when she was primaried because she was an incumbent. Incumbents are tough to beat, but can be primaried and thus do not even appear on the ballot going in to the general election.
Also, please note, even if a candidate loses in the primary, the voters could still vote for that candidate in the general election by write-in. Total long shot to win as the canidate is NOT printed on the ballot.
Good Job! That gives our non-American friends a good base. If they want to be completely confused they can venture out and look up jungle primaries or caucuses. We can't just make things easy can we?
They are setup to make sure California doesn't elect republicans. The primaries are all candidates, and the top 2 (or however many depending on the election requirements) move on to the general - regardless of the party. In practice that usually means 2 democrats.
So, in this case, if I understand you correctly, in California, Republicans and Democrats are not kept separated and it is kind of a Battle Royale at the primary level.
And I thought runoff voting was bad...which BTW Minnesota is thinking about switching to because it's been working so well in Alaska (sarc).
Yeah I'm not a fan of Telegram. I'm not installing a tracking app so I can see someone's videos. If it doesn't make it anywhere else (or is archived) I just don't see it.
This is the kind of stuff that team maga thrives on. They do this? They will write their own political obits.
Anybody who doesn't endorse Trump will get primaried. Two can play this game.
what does primaried mean?
All candidates who want to run sign up to run in a particular party's primary.
The winner of that primary advances to the general election where each party has one candidate.
The threat of being primaried, means they will make sure you lose your first election against members of your own party and you will never advance to the general election to win the seat.
thanks for this
I am not American but as I understand their system, candidates are selected by running a pre-election called a primary. So being "primaried" means you will need to be re-selecetd by your party before you can be allowed to stand again.
If you are not "primaried" you can just stand again without undergoing the pre-selection process.
Think of the primary as narrowing the field of candidates for a party. Going into the primary there are for instance 5 candidates all vying to be the democrat nominee. This includes the incumbent, if any.
Democrats have their primary. Republicans have their primary. This election may be on the same day, but as a voter, I can only vote for the republican slate of candidates OR the democrat slate of candidates for the primary, not both (at least thats how it is in my state). Republicans and democrats do not run against each other in the primaries.
The primary election is held. Only one candidate wins the election for their party and is put forward in the election process as that party's nominee.
To be "primaried", you are the incumbent that lost your bid to be a candidate for re-election. This is the main way this term is used.
All other candidates that lost in the primary are referred to as simply having lost not "primaried". Though technically, one could use the term for any candidate that lost in the primary, the impact of the term is generally used for incumbent candidates.
This happened to Liz Cheney as she did not win in the primary election even though she was the incumbent. This was quite the upset when she was primaried because she was an incumbent. Incumbents are tough to beat, but can be primaried and thus do not even appear on the ballot going in to the general election.
Also, please note, even if a candidate loses in the primary, the voters could still vote for that candidate in the general election by write-in. Total long shot to win as the canidate is NOT printed on the ballot.
Good Job! That gives our non-American friends a good base. If they want to be completely confused they can venture out and look up jungle primaries or caucuses. We can't just make things easy can we?
🙂 Thanks.
We do caucus in MN for president. I've have not heard of jungle primaries. Sounds like a wild time!🙂
They are setup to make sure California doesn't elect republicans. The primaries are all candidates, and the top 2 (or however many depending on the election requirements) move on to the general - regardless of the party. In practice that usually means 2 democrats.
Oh, what an awful spot to be in.
So, in this case, if I understand you correctly, in California, Republicans and Democrats are not kept separated and it is kind of a Battle Royale at the primary level.
And I thought runoff voting was bad...which BTW Minnesota is thinking about switching to because it's been working so well in Alaska (sarc).
hence - jungle primary. Oh yeah - forgot about what you are talking about (actually called ranked-choice voting).
Both of those usually lead to the Democrats winning (or in Alaska the RINOs winning).
File too big can’t view without app
Yeah I'm not a fan of Telegram. I'm not installing a tracking app so I can see someone's videos. If it doesn't make it anywhere else (or is archived) I just don't see it.
The mafia is alive and well, it appears.
That sounds like Jeb Bush and Karl Rove advise to RD. What a bunch of bastards they are. Snakes.