Came to say EXACTLY this. That fat fuking crunt needs to die slowly and publicly. We need to reinstitute public torture for child predators. Period. No arguments. No “But muh slippery slope … But muh civilized society ..” bullshit. Slow, horrible, agonizing death.
The only thing that keeps us civilized is constant reminders that you can't behave like an animal. Society is obligated to make a very public and prominent display of this woman to ensure that everyone knows you don't ever harm the next generation. A strong society would send a message.
No, Fedbois, I'm not going to define what kind of message, so don't think you're going to tag me an an "extremist." But 15 years of jail time for 15 years of pimping out kids to be abused by pedophiles is not sufficient punishment to match the crime committed. Also, Fedbois, while I'm talking about this, that same sentiment goes for the "johns" who purchased services from Epstein and Ghislane Maxwell who you're covering up for. If you had any decency at all, every person on those lists would be in custody and before judges today. Do your freaking job instead of trying to create work on this website.
The argument is that you sound like a deranged lunatic who simply wants revenge instead of justice.
Edit: God bless America and God bless the constitution... except for that part about cruel and unusual punishment, that part only applies when I want it to...
You could rightly claim to be better than them in the sense that you are punishing evil, and they are conducting it, but in practice you are doing the same shit they do to children all the while claiming them to be bad and yourself to be good. It's a joke.
Well, I think that I am better than them. I think that the innocence of children is the most beautiful magic a human can enjoy. I think that one who permanently destroys the life that innocence begets, and the subsequent generations that it destroys, has caused harm to exponential generations of people and steals the pinnacle of beauty from a harmless creature. For this reason, I believe the perpetrator’s punishment should be dealt with the rage of a thousand hurts…hurts that they have caused, and should subsequently also endure. Yep.
Why the f*ck would we listen to an argument protecting child torturers. This is the exact type of person that needs this treatment. Time to get medieval on her and all her customers.
No, the argument is Matthew 18:6; "But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea."
Do that rather than torture them like a depraved, mentally ill lunatic who wants to fulfill their revenge fantasy.
Obviously not everyone here is Christian, but I wonder how many of the 16 people who upvoted this depraved, animalistic nonsense proclaim Christ as their Lord?
No one who thinks that the solution is to do to these people what they do to children is on the side of good, but is rather blinded by the Devil. It is an affront to God.
You sound guilty as hell. Thats a lot of virtue signaling. In defense of what? Punishing a monster? Im wondering now if YOU are not the affront to God. You ramble on an awful lot in defense ….
That would be one thing if torture didn't have downstream affects deleterious to decent people. Develop a machine that kills them and somehow operates itself. Or have them kill eachother. But making an affair out of torture is not good for a man wanting a clean conscience. I won't dehumanize myself to impress anyone.
The question that you raise now is … what are YOU afraid of. I understand your argument for pretty much all other crimes. However, using the innocent for sexual and sadistic gratifications decouples the offender from philosophical machinations of righteousness and justice. Your argument is apologistic in defense of pedophiles. Why is that???
Your argument is baseless and born of a delusional misconception of reality.
If you choose when to apply morality on a case-by-case basis, it is not morality. And it is not of God, Who is the basis of morality, and Who is absolute. He will not selectively apply punishment on judgement day.
Basically, your argument is meaningless as the base assumptions being made are unsubstantiated and wrong.
Furthermore, to reference a common twitter meme, if I say "I like pancakes" and you respond with "so you hate waffles?", you have invented an entirely new sentence and are simply arguing a straw man.
So I don't think you understand my argument to even a small degree.
If I say "torture is always wrong", and you hear "pedophiles should be excused of their crimes and treated with leniency", you display a severe lack of critical thought and are seemingly no more intelligent than a liberal. You'd certainly be behaving and responding in the exact same way they do.
Righteous anger at the crimes these vile demon-scum commit against children will never justify your unrighteous and demonic view of what punishment they should receive. Never. Your dark fantasies of torture and revenge will always remain nearly as demonic as the people you claim to hate. Both their desires and actions, as well as yours, are born of Satan.
Frankly, who or what do you even stand for?
Jesus Christ, the Lord our God, and He who morality comes forth from? He who refused to stone the adulterous woman and instead told her: "Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more."?
Maybe God as presented exclusively in the Old Testament? The Old Testament where we are told: "Do not say, “I will repay evil”; wait for the Lord, and he will deliver you.”?
Or how about the constitution, our great founding document? Surely you believe in this? This which you apply selectively as the arbiter of when it "truly" applies according to some contrived notion of whom moral law applies to?
No, it seems to me that whatever you might stand for takes a back seat to a more primal desire for revenge and to a deep-seated darkness that is born of the Devil.
Interrogatories 101: The guilty will ramble on about virtue, and apply several logical attack fallacies to deflect from their guilt. YOU CHECK ALL BLOCKS
You are 100% either a Fedboi, or a Pedophile. My money is on both.
Came to say EXACTLY this. That fat fuking crunt needs to die slowly and publicly. We need to reinstitute public torture for child predators. Period. No arguments. No “But muh slippery slope … But muh civilized society ..” bullshit. Slow, horrible, agonizing death.
Yeah, I'm not sure - but one thing I do know is that Svetlana Plyushko would absolutely agree with SpaceManBob and Overqualified
100%. SpaceManBob has spent an enormous amount of time on this thread arguing AGAINST proper justice.
Im thinking SMBob is worried. Why come here and virtue signal and attack anons? Just disagree and move on. Nope. Classic guilt response.
Re: "civilized."
The only thing that keeps us civilized is constant reminders that you can't behave like an animal. Society is obligated to make a very public and prominent display of this woman to ensure that everyone knows you don't ever harm the next generation. A strong society would send a message.
No, Fedbois, I'm not going to define what kind of message, so don't think you're going to tag me an an "extremist." But 15 years of jail time for 15 years of pimping out kids to be abused by pedophiles is not sufficient punishment to match the crime committed. Also, Fedbois, while I'm talking about this, that same sentiment goes for the "johns" who purchased services from Epstein and Ghislane Maxwell who you're covering up for. If you had any decency at all, every person on those lists would be in custody and before judges today. Do your freaking job instead of trying to create work on this website.
Awesome
The argument is that you sound like a deranged lunatic who simply wants revenge instead of justice.
Edit: God bless America and God bless the constitution... except for that part about cruel and unusual punishment, that part only applies when I want it to...
I want revenge on them…vicious, agonizing revenge. Yes?
Yes, you are no better than them in practice.
You could rightly claim to be better than them in the sense that you are punishing evil, and they are conducting it, but in practice you are doing the same shit they do to children all the while claiming them to be bad and yourself to be good. It's a joke.
Well, I think that I am better than them. I think that the innocence of children is the most beautiful magic a human can enjoy. I think that one who permanently destroys the life that innocence begets, and the subsequent generations that it destroys, has caused harm to exponential generations of people and steals the pinnacle of beauty from a harmless creature. For this reason, I believe the perpetrator’s punishment should be dealt with the rage of a thousand hurts…hurts that they have caused, and should subsequently also endure. Yep.
Why the f*ck would we listen to an argument protecting child torturers. This is the exact type of person that needs this treatment. Time to get medieval on her and all her customers.
No, the argument is Matthew 18:6; "But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea."
Do that rather than torture them like a depraved, mentally ill lunatic who wants to fulfill their revenge fantasy.
Obviously not everyone here is Christian, but I wonder how many of the 16 people who upvoted this depraved, animalistic nonsense proclaim Christ as their Lord?
No one who thinks that the solution is to do to these people what they do to children is on the side of good, but is rather blinded by the Devil. It is an affront to God.
fren i just want you to know where i stand. fk her--------wall
You sound guilty as hell. Thats a lot of virtue signaling. In defense of what? Punishing a monster? Im wondering now if YOU are not the affront to God. You ramble on an awful lot in defense ….
That would be one thing if torture didn't have downstream affects deleterious to decent people. Develop a machine that kills them and somehow operates itself. Or have them kill eachother. But making an affair out of torture is not good for a man wanting a clean conscience. I won't dehumanize myself to impress anyone.
It is fine to want revenge on those who would commit atrocities against children.
It is righteous even.
Revenge is not justice, and it never will be. They are distinct.
Justice is righteous.
What about instances within the Bible of righteous revenge?
There is no distinction. It isn't black and white like that, and absolutely never was.
Reminder that you are commanded to hate evil.
There's serious people and there's people that want to punish others so bad they don't care who else gets damaged or hurt. They are already ruined.
Agreed.
I mean, this shit pisses me off to no end as well. But we can't be slaves to our emotions, or we will end up no better than our enemies.
The left has been making decisions based on emotions for years, and it has led to nothing other than destruction and degeneration. We must be better.
The question that you raise now is … what are YOU afraid of. I understand your argument for pretty much all other crimes. However, using the innocent for sexual and sadistic gratifications decouples the offender from philosophical machinations of righteousness and justice. Your argument is apologistic in defense of pedophiles. Why is that???
I fear God.
Your argument is baseless and born of a delusional misconception of reality.
If you choose when to apply morality on a case-by-case basis, it is not morality. And it is not of God, Who is the basis of morality, and Who is absolute. He will not selectively apply punishment on judgement day.
Basically, your argument is meaningless as the base assumptions being made are unsubstantiated and wrong.
Furthermore, to reference a common twitter meme, if I say "I like pancakes" and you respond with "so you hate waffles?", you have invented an entirely new sentence and are simply arguing a straw man.
So I don't think you understand my argument to even a small degree.
If I say "torture is always wrong", and you hear "pedophiles should be excused of their crimes and treated with leniency", you display a severe lack of critical thought and are seemingly no more intelligent than a liberal. You'd certainly be behaving and responding in the exact same way they do.
Righteous anger at the crimes these vile demon-scum commit against children will never justify your unrighteous and demonic view of what punishment they should receive. Never. Your dark fantasies of torture and revenge will always remain nearly as demonic as the people you claim to hate. Both their desires and actions, as well as yours, are born of Satan.
Frankly, who or what do you even stand for?
Jesus Christ, the Lord our God, and He who morality comes forth from? He who refused to stone the adulterous woman and instead told her: "Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more."?
Maybe God as presented exclusively in the Old Testament? The Old Testament where we are told: "Do not say, “I will repay evil”; wait for the Lord, and he will deliver you.”?
Or how about the constitution, our great founding document? Surely you believe in this? This which you apply selectively as the arbiter of when it "truly" applies according to some contrived notion of whom moral law applies to?
No, it seems to me that whatever you might stand for takes a back seat to a more primal desire for revenge and to a deep-seated darkness that is born of the Devil.
Now, any more questions?
Interrogatories 101: The guilty will ramble on about virtue, and apply several logical attack fallacies to deflect from their guilt. YOU CHECK ALL BLOCKS
You are 100% either a Fedboi, or a Pedophile. My money is on both.