I thought this too as my 5th grader read a Scholastic News article about this submarine that visits the Titanic. The class had to write an opinion essay on if they would spend a vacation doing this and the whole thing just seemed weird. This is after the same kids’ news magazine had an article about “eating the bugs” and also brain chips. My daughter hates Scholastic now and I tried to tell the idiot PFA to no avail.
Lots of questions. No answers. It's like talking to a 4-year-old. I have no obligation to abandon the provable material facts. You have an obligation to prove anything other to be true.
Sounds like CNN talking about Joe Biden's crimes. Just take everything at face value then. There's no evidence right here, right now, right in front of your face, so just believe what you've been told by Mockingbird Media and don't ask questions.
You are full of assumptions...which is your whole problem. You take a complete fantasy as reality and disdain the actual facts. And, against my contention, you can't even cite one or two of the most important pieces of physical evidence. (No mystery. There is none.) You are shooting blanks and trying to substitute personal remarks. You are the one who is not asking questions of this whole charade.
I never once stated what I personally believe regarding the titanic. I was hoping you'd fill me in on why you believe it was an organic event. I don't have a dog in this fight. You agreed that it would be stupid to think it was intentionally sunk but never explained why, while saying the burden is on the conspiracy theorist. I'm not the conspiracy theorist. I'm neutral but open to possibility and you haven't swayed me towards either conclusion. My only problem with what you've said is you're attacking people who think it was intentional, but you haven't explained why that's a stupid thought.
I'm sure he's NOT referring to the Jesuit priest who took pictures of everybody aboard the Titanic and coincidentally exited the ship mid trip, right before it left Ireland to launch itself into an iceberg.
The young Jesuit photographed the Titanic leaving port for the last time as it left Queenstown, in County Cork, for New York. He could have been onboard: An American couple he befriended on the ship offered to fund the final leg of the journey to New York.
From the Titanic, he sent a telegram to his provincial in Dublin to request permission. However, a frosty telegram awaited him in Queenstown: “Get off that ship.”
When news of the Titanic’s disastrous fate reached Fr. Browne, he folded the telegram and put it into his wallet and kept it there for the rest of his life. He later said it was the only time holy obedience had saved a life.
There are several books on the subject and a very good debunking page that takes all the conspiracy points to a confrontation with reality. To emulate the treatment I have received here previously, go do your own research. (Hint: There was no ship swap. The serial numbers on the propellers are identification. Etc., etc.)
The serial numbers of a propeller (something that literally can be unbolted even though its size makes it difficult) is better evidence than pictures of the differences between the window layout on each which is then compared to the pictures of the ship at the bottom of the ocean?
Ask yourself how the serial numbers get added to a propeller. In my pleasure boat experience, they are stamped into the brass/bronze. It would seem trivial to stamp a different or even additional serial number onto a propeller and use its existence as “proof”. Changing out the window arrangement would be much more difficult. No?
Flat earth is insult to the humanity
To any with even the least intelligence.
Oh, this is an interesting viewpoint: the Titan debacle will be used to intervene with any subsequent Titanic explorations.
I thought this might be the intended result in this pervious post of mine. I remain hopeful anyway, https://greatawakening.win/p/16bPnstv07/the-missing-sub-and-a-red-octobe/
I thought this too as my 5th grader read a Scholastic News article about this submarine that visits the Titanic. The class had to write an opinion essay on if they would spend a vacation doing this and the whole thing just seemed weird. This is after the same kids’ news magazine had an article about “eating the bugs” and also brain chips. My daughter hates Scholastic now and I tried to tell the idiot PFA to no avail.
I learnt about the Titanic from this doco:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/s1nPYDj7KBEQ/
The Titanic Never sank, it's actually a1989 Buick Century.
[°~°] Derp.
I saw that meme, kek
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1671863457476386816.html - twitter feed unroll.
Great read, the company is even called "OceanGATE"
Look, a normie ☝️ Back to Reddit where you belong
Okay, but I'm curious what you think happened on 09/11/2001 when two airplanes destroyed three buildings in New York. Please enlighten us.
So, 9/11 was done on purpose, but the titanic sinking could not have possibly been done on purpose and anyone who suspects otherwise is a stupid?
You're on an Anon board. You have the obligation to GTFOH with your mainstream news hyperbole.
u/#q142
Lots of questions. No answers. It's like talking to a 4-year-old. I have no obligation to abandon the provable material facts. You have an obligation to prove anything other to be true.
So what books did you read and believe? Let's start there.
"There is no evidence..."
Sounds like CNN talking about Joe Biden's crimes. Just take everything at face value then. There's no evidence right here, right now, right in front of your face, so just believe what you've been told by Mockingbird Media and don't ask questions.
You are full of assumptions...which is your whole problem. You take a complete fantasy as reality and disdain the actual facts. And, against my contention, you can't even cite one or two of the most important pieces of physical evidence. (No mystery. There is none.) You are shooting blanks and trying to substitute personal remarks. You are the one who is not asking questions of this whole charade.
I never once stated what I personally believe regarding the titanic. I was hoping you'd fill me in on why you believe it was an organic event. I don't have a dog in this fight. You agreed that it would be stupid to think it was intentionally sunk but never explained why, while saying the burden is on the conspiracy theorist. I'm not the conspiracy theorist. I'm neutral but open to possibility and you haven't swayed me towards either conclusion. My only problem with what you've said is you're attacking people who think it was intentional, but you haven't explained why that's a stupid thought.
What kind of "factual evidence" do you refer to? Wikipedia?
I'm sure he's NOT referring to the Jesuit priest who took pictures of everybody aboard the Titanic and coincidentally exited the ship mid trip, right before it left Ireland to launch itself into an iceberg.
https://catholicherald.org/news/nation-and-world/jesuit-seminarian-took-photographs-of-titanics-infamous-voyage/
Archived link - https://archive.ph/N6z7D
What did the Jesuit provincial know?
There are several books on the subject and a very good debunking page that takes all the conspiracy points to a confrontation with reality. To emulate the treatment I have received here previously, go do your own research. (Hint: There was no ship swap. The serial numbers on the propellers are identification. Etc., etc.)
The serial numbers of a propeller (something that literally can be unbolted even though its size makes it difficult) is better evidence than pictures of the differences between the window layout on each which is then compared to the pictures of the ship at the bottom of the ocean?
Ask yourself how the serial numbers get added to a propeller. In my pleasure boat experience, they are stamped into the brass/bronze. It would seem trivial to stamp a different or even additional serial number onto a propeller and use its existence as “proof”. Changing out the window arrangement would be much more difficult. No?
9/11 was a HEIST. $$300 BILLION in gold stolen from the basement vault.