Seems frazzledrip is making rounds
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (307)
sorted by:
Please explain.
If no one has seen it before, how would you know someone has not edited a 20 year old video two years or two weeks ago?
Durrrrr.
I saw the video on VOAT in late 2018, so it has been seen. Others on VOAT who surf the dark web (I don’t) claimed they first saw it when Killary was Obama’s SOS (2009 to 2013). Others claimed it first hit the dark web when she in the Senate (2001 to 2008). It has been seen by people that testified to it before the ability of believable deep fakes.
This is the video that was on Weiners laptop in a file titled insurance that Sydney Powell said made veteran NY cops physically ill and led to a bunch of those cops being 'suicided', right?
I tend towards believing this is real. Maybe Hillary can sacrifice a chicken in her backyard for the truth.
the 'suiciding' of all those officers leans strongly towards it being authentic.
I can’t comment on the NYPD story, but it has been discussed.
Ah yes, the old "other people" claim. Very credible.
I am just remembering the discussion from the days on VOAT. Unless I spend a lot of time digging through their archives, I admit that I have no sauce. However, I just testified and commented to seeing it in late 2018. I have also seen stills of the event. I’m not too up on technology, but how good were deep fakes pre-2019?
I am in the same camp as you for the most part, but considering the source material, who would you trust to judge except "other people"?
Certainly not the DoJ.
So if you saw it tell us what was in it.
I have heard of it but it was never anywhere people claimed it was by the time I got there. Most scrubbed AF
You’re correct. I have heard that it has only been posted for a short time anywhere. When it was on VOAT, I think it was removed a few hours later. I was (un)lucky enough to see it when it was there. I have also seen pictures somewhere.
There are two questions on the legitimacy of it. 1. Why would Killary film it? 2. How would anyone in her organization let it out?
I thought you couldn’t reliably ‘deep fake’ video tape. Digital video is what’s used to make the best ‘deep fakes’. I am not a techno-fag, but I remember reading/hearing that all Epstein’s videos were on tape and therefore harder to claim ‘deepfake’. Please correct me if I’m wrong. Cheers
deinterlace
run deepfake
soften
interlace
upload
That's enough to fool tards.
Besides you think no one could take a screen shot, black out children and upload stills? It's been done before to expose pedophiles. The reason they don't is because the lie gets exposed.
Thanks
Quality really matters for deepfakes. The AI can only do so much with dark or low quality pixels. What program do you use to accomplish deepfakes on old data?
You can probably reliably date the Epstein videos if they are still on the original tapes in the equipment.
This video is "circulating" on the internet - which means it is in digital form. Likely mp4, mkv, or mpg. Anything could be done to that (if it is even the real one).
I can record a Blueray movie such as Avatar to a VHS tape and then rip it to my computer, doesn't mean the Na'vi are real.
It is also very trivial to add filters and rerecord over the raw video to keep those filters from being easily removed in the original file.
Thank you.
BTW, the downvotes are not from me. I like when people initiate a discussion or give a reason to go over a history on a topic. To prove it wasn’t from me, I’m going to give an upvote to both your comments now.
I wasn't assuming they were.