Wisconsin lawmakers push to add ballot watermarks in order to improve election security...👌
(www.washingtonexaminer.com)
Comments (14)
sorted by:
If I was democrat governor Evans, who won my last election by cheating, I would veto a ballot integrity bill too.
"The plan will go to the legislature, which is Republican-controlled. The plan would then be presented to Gov. Tony Evers (D-MI), who has promised to veto legislation making voting harder."
Yeah they need a veto proof majority...
u/#q1803
It's interesting that #1803 implies we could use the "Russia Russia Russia" narrative to improve the election process. Turn the left's fear of an imagined Russian attack on elections to trick them into improving election security?
u/#q2479
#2479 indicates blank ballots and illegal immigration zones are key to the rigging. DHS is implied to be complicit.
u/#q4722
#4722 is a bit fascinating to peek at as it's very easy to read that in the context of liberals and the press freaking out after a big red win and doubting the results. After seeing all the doublethink liberals are having to subject themselves to (cluster bombs, masking, vaccinations, BLM, trusting women re: me too, Ukraine Nazis & corruption, insurrection vs. protests on Jan 6, trusting CDC, etc. etc. etc.), they're now going to be subjected to a 180 degree flip on election integrity?
That'd be very tasty.
First question that hits my head is exactly HOW are watermarks on absentee ballots going to make it harder to vote? Don't you still just fill it out and mail it back? Watermark only proves if it's an actual absentee ballot or a fake - fake means they aren't qualified to make that vote to begin with. Or am I just crazy?
And when you have ballot printing companies that aren't exactly on the up and up, yeah, it makes the whole situation sketchy. There are ways to cheat, and ANY mass mail in system is the best way. Corrupted voter rolls as well. As soon as polls close, they know who hasn't voted. Then, like magic, the person they want to win gets all of those votes. Dead voters, moved voters, non existent voters, 10,000 voters with the same address. Thousands more who were born in 1890. It's a grab bag for votes needed, and it must be fixed.
I won't even get into machines swapping votes...
While I agree with you, only leads me to wonder MORE why Dems would oppose it.
That watermark going to be the Chinese flag impression?
Watch the watermark
And how much do you want to bet the Democrats are going to fight this tooth and nail. If they do, what does that show you.
To me this is a no-brainer. Watermarks, secret coding on ballots, special paper, certain printing companies, hand counts, one day voting, receiving a copy of your ballot ( ability to verify your votes at will), photo ID, these are safeguards.
The fiat currency in your wallet is more secure than the ballot you placed last election. That is a very serious problem
Hey, normies -- Don't you think it's kind of funny, how the left (D) always fights tooth and nail against any measures to improve election honesty?
Why, you'd almost think they want to have dishonest elections, wouldn't you?
Why not voter ID?
An admission of crime yet no arrests, no gallows.
They push, they propose, they inquire, they introduce….words. Getting it done, that’s the part they really have a problem with. And then the, apparently, hardest job in the world….ENFORCING THE LAW!