Incorrect. Listen and/or read the transcript on the tweet.
"Expect every lie." does not equal "They were all lies."
Chill with the name calling and accusations. Breathe a minute. Consider what I'm saying and respond to my points. Think like a lawyer. Think like an English teacher.
What topic did Ballard explicitly deny? What topics did he dance round?
None of what I said passes judgement on Ballard. It's a simple observation that he didn't address the topic. My observation on that fact shouldn't trigger an emotional reaction in you.
Agreed, if it's not double speak it sure comes off like it. I want to believe this guy but we need to be suspicious first, confirm lack of guilt later in situations like this.
Overall though, the movie is having a very positive affect towards awareness of the subject so even if the guy that made it sucks (jury is still out) it's a chads move benefiting the WH more than the black hats at this time.
I agree with you. Critical thinking is necessary, and we don’t know who to trust.
Considering governments are behind human trafficking, ours being the worst, why aren’t they calling out the traffickers themselves? The governments? The CIA? Name names. Ballard knows whom are behind this 350 billion a year industry. If we should even call it that.
Discernment is a core necessity.
Anyone jumping on your ass is wrong.
Plus this dark to light business. That is Masonic. It’s good versus evil. God versus satan. Lucifer is the false light. Are we being led to the false light? Two sides of the same coin?
He did address the topic. You refuse to accept how he addresses it with the words “it” and “Bologna.” He’s not an English teacher or a lawyer, and the way he communicates is evidence of that. He’s a simple common man using simple language in his refutations. All the lies about him are Bologna. You must stop what you’re doing because it’s only hurting yourself.
How many simple, common men do you think are working at CIA and DHS on human trafficking?
I've made numerous analytical comments over the years in that exact form on this forum. Asking questions and rooting out bad actors is part of the day to day here. The deranged reaction it got indicates I inadvertently hit a target.
I had no opinion on Ballard whatsoever till I saw the backlash this morning, but based on just that I'm fairly confident he's up to something duplicitous now. 🤣
Incorrect. Listen and/or read the transcript on the tweet.
"Expect every lie." does not equal "They were all lies."
Chill with the name calling and accusations. Breathe a minute. Consider what I'm saying and respond to my points. Think like a lawyer. Think like an English teacher.
What topic did Ballard explicitly deny? What topics did he dance round?
None of what I said passes judgement on Ballard. It's a simple observation that he didn't address the topic. My observation on that fact shouldn't trigger an emotional reaction in you.
Why and How do so many Glowies have Frogs next to their names?
Hey Merf, someone called you a Glowie and you didn't deny it so it's clear you're a Glowie.
Kudos and thanks for the Kek.
Mirroring can be fun. Especially with virtuous aggressives
Kudos and thanks for the Kek.
Mirroring can be fun. Especially when dealing with virtuous aggressives.
Those who are good hearted may eventually look in the proferred mirror, have an epiphany and a rueful laugh.
Fwiw such moments in my own life are still some of my favorite and most life transforming moments.
Now you're getting it! 🤣🤣
So let me put this rumor to rest at the same level Tim Ballard did:
I saw a post that seems to be trending on GAW from u/farpointpatriot that I'm a kiddie fucker.
It’s complete bologna! I’ve never weighed in on that, I’ve never said anything, in fact, I’m very much against anything that involves kiddie fucking.
I found out yesterday that apparently I’m involved in the FBI, I run pay ops networks, or that I’m some mason involved in strange Masonic practices…
It’s not gonna stop. Expect every lie.
Agreed, if it's not double speak it sure comes off like it. I want to believe this guy but we need to be suspicious first, confirm lack of guilt later in situations like this.
Overall though, the movie is having a very positive affect towards awareness of the subject so even if the guy that made it sucks (jury is still out) it's a chads move benefiting the WH more than the black hats at this time.
His last sentence is what gave me a little blip on the conspiracy radar…
But not passing any judgement either. But everything does need to stand up to scrutiny. Like DJT does.
I agree with you. Critical thinking is necessary, and we don’t know who to trust.
Considering governments are behind human trafficking, ours being the worst, why aren’t they calling out the traffickers themselves? The governments? The CIA? Name names. Ballard knows whom are behind this 350 billion a year industry. If we should even call it that.
Discernment is a core necessity.
Anyone jumping on your ass is wrong.
Plus this dark to light business. That is Masonic. It’s good versus evil. God versus satan. Lucifer is the false light. Are we being led to the false light? Two sides of the same coin?
He did address the topic. You refuse to accept how he addresses it with the words “it” and “Bologna.” He’s not an English teacher or a lawyer, and the way he communicates is evidence of that. He’s a simple common man using simple language in his refutations. All the lies about him are Bologna. You must stop what you’re doing because it’s only hurting yourself.
How many simple, common men do you think are working at CIA and DHS on human trafficking?
I've made numerous analytical comments over the years in that exact form on this forum. Asking questions and rooting out bad actors is part of the day to day here. The deranged reaction it got indicates I inadvertently hit a target.
I had no opinion on Ballard whatsoever till I saw the backlash this morning, but based on just that I'm fairly confident he's up to something duplicitous now. 🤣