Just like with elections, there are dozens of ways to distort the results. Here are some. In short, there is no direct way to measure the average temperature of the earth so any figure has come from a calculation based on many temperature readings. That has involved all kinds of interpolation and extrapolation.
The NOAA graph in the above picture shows how much warming "correction" has been applied to data by NOAA. The image on the right shows where most of the thermometers are and where most of the warming occurs. Surprise! Most warming happens where there are the fewest thermometers.
Other charts show that the coolest places are where the forests are. That is, the places with the most CO2 are the coolest? Counter narrative?
One year they discarded thousands of weather stations. If you do that carefully you can engineer any temperature change you want. Some people have noticed that historic temperaures can fall. That is one sure way to ensure a temperature rise in the present. Basiclly, if you can think of a way to distort the numbers then they will have tried it.
Not only that, but even the thermometers used to measure the comparison temperatures may not be in the same locations or use the same technology for measurement. Since the thermometers used over the last 100 years may not have had the same accuracy, precision, or calibration as those used today.
Having been interested in science (in general), and specifically marine biology and meteorology since I was a young child, I always knew the hubris and arrogance of mankind would be it's downfall. Nature has "8 ways to Sunday" (to quote Schumer) of getting back at those who attempt to control her. Think Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End when the 9 Pirate Lords finally free Calypso from her earthly shackles. She goes on to create the biggest tempest man had seen to that point and sank th ships who sook to control her the most. She also claimed her love, Davey Jones, as payment for the sin of weather control.
Although I am not a scientist (couldn't get past the obligatory and prerequisite mind control indoctrination courses) I have never lost the love of science. I taught myself how to "read" the weather, listened closely to GrandpaFree (probably the best person I knew who could "read" weather patterns in the old ways), learned some of NOAAs tricks they teach the Naval Meteorology Officers when I was a Sailor, and have paid close attention to "muh climate change" debate and its so-called trove of "evidence." Needless to say, the data is all bunk. Humans have contributed what amounts to a "near zero" effect, cumulatively, since our discovery of fire. 0.0001% of ALL global effects since the dawn of humanity can be attributed to human influenced climate change.
To put this into perspective, Edward Teller, who went on to head the H-Bomb project, had fears that a runaway nuclear reaction could occur if hydrogen was ignited in the atmosphere during the Trinity Atomic Bomb Test @ Los Alamos. The statistical chance was less than 3:1,000,00 chances. Not a zero, but still statistically impossible.
Scientists will never admit it's a statistical "zero sum" because there is always a chance, no matter how slight. In mathematics, on can never achieve a true zero sum. Conversely, one can never achieve a 100% total sum. And the media and so-called "leaders" of this world pad numbers, use faulty data, and/or manipulate findings by allowing the media heads to distort everything in order to push a certain narrative. [they] know [they] can't enact certain "changes" or laws, edicts, etc without the public's consent. [they] rule using fear based arguments, not logic and reason. Which is ironic, since [they] supposedly espouse logic and reason in [their] arguments. This is what's called a logical fallacy.
That being said, humanity IS capable of controlling the environment and its inhabitants thru poisoning relatively small areas. Areas such as the Gulf of Mexico or the Baltic Sea or Gulf of Alaska by ordering oil spills. Or poisoning our groundwater thru the use of DDT or glyphosate. Or poisoning as much surface area thru the use of chemtrails, or thru the use of other "forever" chemicals like Teflon in our cooking utensils.
This revelation that most of the temp guages used in monitoring our global temps are centered in urban or suburban, mostly concreted areas makes sense, from a control point of view. If humanity can't fully control the weather, what better way to control the population than thru the use of fear based tactics?
Back when I had flying lessons and solo practice in Cessna 150's/152's, I remember flying over asphalt parking lots and the thermals were incredible, it was like going at speed in a car/motorcycle and hitting a ramp.
Airports need to know what weather is on the way so they install weather stations, this is SOP since the early days of flight.
Its not the airports fault that this happens, nor is it their fault that deceitful muppets exploit this.
100% correct. Every local MSM outlet always says "the temp at the airport right now is XX", why the airport? Who cares?! It's a concrete desert, so the temp will always be at least 10 degrees higher.
You gotta read beyond the headline to see their bullshit. It’s all based on a model. tRUsT tHE sCiEnCe!
Tuesday’s global average temperature was calculated by a model that uses data from weather stations, ships, ocean buoys and satellites, Paulo Ceppi, a climate scientist at London’s Grantham Institute, explained in an email Wednesday. This modeling system has been used to estimate daily average temperatures starting in 1979.
“This is our ‘best guess’ of what the surface temperature at each point on earth was yesterday,” he said.
Instrument-based global temperature records go back to the mid-19th century, but for temperatures before that, scientists are dependent on proxy data captured through evidence left in tree rings and ice cores. “These data tell us that it hasn’t been this warm since at least 125,000 years ago, which was the previous interglacial,” Ceppi said, referring to a period of unusual warmth between two ice ages.
Now I see that my crappy Gannett CIA paper has a major article on "climate change" EVERY SINGLE DAY. This is the big push now. And, the climate where I live, upstate NY, is exactly the same as it was when I was a child, a long time ago. NOTHING is different. Maybe it's a bit cooler, with fewer days above 90, but that is all. All the plants come up the same time as always, and NOTHING IS DIFFERENT.
I can only speak for my area, Phoenix. There are about a hundred "weather stations" on my app (Weather Underground, wunderground.com) so I can check temperatures all over the metro area, about 60 miles x 60 miles. The temperatures reported have a range of about 5 degrees over that area, e.g. 105-110, and are distributed as expected with most around the average, in this example 107. There are a few puzzling outliers which are much higher, e.g. one station at South Mountain which in this example might be 112. One of the cooler ones is always at Sky Harbor.
I think this factoid about the location of temperature sensors may be outdated, or if things are as they are here, reporting can be skewed a little by selection. But not much. I have thermometers, they are cheap, both spring type and electronic, and an IR laser "gun" type sensor for surface temperatures, and they all check out close to official reports. Try it yourself! This is as easy as research gets!
All you need to know is that there are lies, damned lies and statistics!
Just like with elections, there are dozens of ways to distort the results. Here are some. In short, there is no direct way to measure the average temperature of the earth so any figure has come from a calculation based on many temperature readings. That has involved all kinds of interpolation and extrapolation.
The NOAA graph in the above picture shows how much warming "correction" has been applied to data by NOAA. The image on the right shows where most of the thermometers are and where most of the warming occurs. Surprise! Most warming happens where there are the fewest thermometers.
Other charts show that the coolest places are where the forests are. That is, the places with the most CO2 are the coolest? Counter narrative?
One year they discarded thousands of weather stations. If you do that carefully you can engineer any temperature change you want. Some people have noticed that historic temperaures can fall. That is one sure way to ensure a temperature rise in the present. Basiclly, if you can think of a way to distort the numbers then they will have tried it.
Not only that, but even the thermometers used to measure the comparison temperatures may not be in the same locations or use the same technology for measurement. Since the thermometers used over the last 100 years may not have had the same accuracy, precision, or calibration as those used today.
Holy shit I have been saying this for 32 years now. I was a teenager in Los Angeles when I realized this.
Having been interested in science (in general), and specifically marine biology and meteorology since I was a young child, I always knew the hubris and arrogance of mankind would be it's downfall. Nature has "8 ways to Sunday" (to quote Schumer) of getting back at those who attempt to control her. Think Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End when the 9 Pirate Lords finally free Calypso from her earthly shackles. She goes on to create the biggest tempest man had seen to that point and sank th ships who sook to control her the most. She also claimed her love, Davey Jones, as payment for the sin of weather control.
Although I am not a scientist (couldn't get past the obligatory and prerequisite mind control indoctrination courses) I have never lost the love of science. I taught myself how to "read" the weather, listened closely to GrandpaFree (probably the best person I knew who could "read" weather patterns in the old ways), learned some of NOAAs tricks they teach the Naval Meteorology Officers when I was a Sailor, and have paid close attention to "muh climate change" debate and its so-called trove of "evidence." Needless to say, the data is all bunk. Humans have contributed what amounts to a "near zero" effect, cumulatively, since our discovery of fire. 0.0001% of ALL global effects since the dawn of humanity can be attributed to human influenced climate change.
To put this into perspective, Edward Teller, who went on to head the H-Bomb project, had fears that a runaway nuclear reaction could occur if hydrogen was ignited in the atmosphere during the Trinity Atomic Bomb Test @ Los Alamos. The statistical chance was less than 3:1,000,00 chances. Not a zero, but still statistically impossible.
Scientists will never admit it's a statistical "zero sum" because there is always a chance, no matter how slight. In mathematics, on can never achieve a true zero sum. Conversely, one can never achieve a 100% total sum. And the media and so-called "leaders" of this world pad numbers, use faulty data, and/or manipulate findings by allowing the media heads to distort everything in order to push a certain narrative. [they] know [they] can't enact certain "changes" or laws, edicts, etc without the public's consent. [they] rule using fear based arguments, not logic and reason. Which is ironic, since [they] supposedly espouse logic and reason in [their] arguments. This is what's called a logical fallacy.
That being said, humanity IS capable of controlling the environment and its inhabitants thru poisoning relatively small areas. Areas such as the Gulf of Mexico or the Baltic Sea or Gulf of Alaska by ordering oil spills. Or poisoning our groundwater thru the use of DDT or glyphosate. Or poisoning as much surface area thru the use of chemtrails, or thru the use of other "forever" chemicals like Teflon in our cooking utensils.
This revelation that most of the temp guages used in monitoring our global temps are centered in urban or suburban, mostly concreted areas makes sense, from a control point of view. If humanity can't fully control the weather, what better way to control the population than thru the use of fear based tactics?
Back when I had flying lessons and solo practice in Cessna 150's/152's, I remember flying over asphalt parking lots and the thermals were incredible, it was like going at speed in a car/motorcycle and hitting a ramp.
They cannot win by doing things properly, so they cheat.
Every time, always.
News outlets in the UK just got busted using ground temperature instead of the air temperature. I'm pretty sure they're doing this in the US too.
Europes obsession with Nitrogen is the funniest thing. Our atmosphere is made up of 78.08% Nitrogen.
The total lack of logic is truly amazing.
You can thank the school system and MSM for that..
Right. What harm do they allege from nitrogen?
Add in the people who pay big $$$ to fill their tires with nitrogen instead of air.
I can see it in tires for a 200 mph $2 million race car but a passenger vehicle?
Idiots.
In the U.S. the sensors are put near Pence and other politicians who attract flies.
Airports need to know what weather is on the way so they install weather stations, this is SOP since the early days of flight. Its not the airports fault that this happens, nor is it their fault that deceitful muppets exploit this.
Its not a deliberate conspiracy.
100% correct. Every local MSM outlet always says "the temp at the airport right now is XX", why the airport? Who cares?! It's a concrete desert, so the temp will always be at least 10 degrees higher.
Just like they put our air quality sensors right by a major intersection with a fire station and many diesel trucks.
Not only that, but the claim is partially based on a MODEL.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2023/07/05/hottest-day-ever-recorded/
You gotta read beyond the headline to see their bullshit. It’s all based on a model. tRUsT tHE sCiEnCe!
Now I see that my crappy Gannett CIA paper has a major article on "climate change" EVERY SINGLE DAY. This is the big push now. And, the climate where I live, upstate NY, is exactly the same as it was when I was a child, a long time ago. NOTHING is different. Maybe it's a bit cooler, with fewer days above 90, but that is all. All the plants come up the same time as always, and NOTHING IS DIFFERENT.
I can only speak for my area, Phoenix. There are about a hundred "weather stations" on my app (Weather Underground, wunderground.com) so I can check temperatures all over the metro area, about 60 miles x 60 miles. The temperatures reported have a range of about 5 degrees over that area, e.g. 105-110, and are distributed as expected with most around the average, in this example 107. There are a few puzzling outliers which are much higher, e.g. one station at South Mountain which in this example might be 112. One of the cooler ones is always at Sky Harbor.
I think this factoid about the location of temperature sensors may be outdated, or if things are as they are here, reporting can be skewed a little by selection. But not much. I have thermometers, they are cheap, both spring type and electronic, and an IR laser "gun" type sensor for surface temperatures, and they all check out close to official reports. Try it yourself! This is as easy as research gets!
and of course they never mention this: https://www.livescience.com/tonga-eruption-water-vapor-surface-warming