“Bigger than you can imagine”
"THE BEST IS YET TO COME."
Q stated quiet a few times “bigger than you can imagine…”
How big can we imagine this to be? Anyone got any mind blowing theories?
Q stated quiet a few times “bigger than you can imagine…”
How big can we imagine this to be? Anyone got any mind blowing theories?
Basically if you keep going down these red-pill rabbit holes, you find out people are more attached to the lies than you realized, and that even truthers have a limit. It’s not all Building 7. The red pills also start to undermine emotional attachments, nostalgia, national identities, history, etc. Many traumas are also lies and hoaxes - that didn’t start with Covid - and people do NOT like having their traumas taken away. It seems counter-intuitive, but then you realize that people define themselves by their traumas, so of course they will cling to them like addicts.
Q told us the military had made the decision to only reveal 40% of the truth to the public because to reveal the other 60% would cause people to reject and revolt. I used to think Q meant they would reject and revolt against the cabal, but actually now I think Q meant they would reject and revolt against the people who brought the cabal down. That people would hate Q Team and say they preferred the illusion the cabal had created, even if it meant being a tax-slave for pedophiles. Basically Cypher in The Matrix.
Originally, Q said only 20% would be revealed and anons were so pissed off, Q said the military had met and agreed to increase disclosure to 40%. Sometimes I think Covid and the Election Fraud are part of that extra 20%, as both revealed layers of corruption no one was fully aware of. Imagine if trying to get Q Team up to 60% or 80% meant more disclosure events like Covid. Could you see how people would start to turn their anger against Q for pulling back the veil and showing (not telling) the world what was going on? Do you think Q could have ever told us everything that Covid showed us.
What technique is used I wonder to determine how much exposure/disclosure of the lie/truth can be released before we hit a toppling point? At some point it must have been determined that we could handle 40% vs 20%. How did they know?
I agree we must be shown as much as we can handle. This is how we mature enough to handle making and keeping America great again.
I believe that we have to actively seek out the potentially harmful stuff, rather than it being spoon-fed via the boggle box.
I think it goes even further than that. If someone is forced to face their fears and deal with them when they aren't ready they could end up hating life itself, and everyone in it.
It could happen anyway. I have to work at stopping myself from hating everyone and everything around me.
I was never like that before.
The roads are shit, the weather is shit, the people around me are shitty selfish bastards that only care about themselves & the tiny little bubble they live in.
The people whose JOB it to do ONE specific task don't give a shit about quality, customer satisfaction nothing. They expect to do the absolute bare minimum & get paid handsomely, and praised for just showing up ... late & unprepared.
I wanna go live in lighthouse and leave humanity far behind.
A different town / state might be better for you fren. I find much of the Northeast very bleak if that's where you are.
Me too, NY State.... have had the house listed -- trying to leave, but it's not working out so far....
You, sir, are preaching to the converted :)
It makes you hate the social instinct within us, doesn't it? I've learned to suppress it a bit, and only utilize the parts of it that really matter. It's a bit like becoming a sociopath without the total annihilation of conscience and compassion.
I've come to the conclusion that everything is shit nowadays (and I mean everything), but I keep praying for that glorious day...
Ah someone else said it, I've suspected for some time that many of us here see through so much of the lies and have an easier time going against the mind-controlled masses because we have something in common with sociopaths except we still have a proper moral compass.
Doubt they could tell us anything that would surprise me. Been down this hole since I was a child.
He also said 60% will remain hidden "for humanity".
There's nothing that could be revealed that would be more shocking than what many of us already know and suspect the demons are up to. Q and the team are protecting those who have never read his info.
So, we don't get to know the truth about history and what certain people have done?
I can't agree with this. Not at all.
I've had two violent incident experiences. One in real life, one through a video without a warning. They were deeply scaring and the problem is that there was nothing I could do... they were just ... bad. I really wish I didn't have those experiences. This is the closest to a reason for experiencing those I've come so far.. sharing that sometimes there are things that are just.. bad.
I want to know truth too. But truth with a reason, not just pain. That there's something that can be done. I don't need to know the nitty gritty details of ritual sacrifices, tortures, pedos, etc. I believe it happens and I'm aware it's got to be stopped! Obviously we need to be given the facts, but an outline is good to start with. Then we can see what needs to be fleshed out more.
So, I'm hoping that's a lot of what they're keeping to themselves. The nitty gritty details that don't really need to be delved into to make us understand. We have a lot of details already.
Just my two cents.
Q also said the choice, to know, will be yours.
One theory is that the cabal has been mixing human meat into the food supply for decades as a big joke on humanity. They themselves are cannibals, and they wanted to make us cannibals against our will too. I’ve even heard that any product that says “natural flavors” on it is cabal code for “human meat”. To me it makes sense because what does “natural flavors” even mean? Why would they even need to write that? If they put strawberries in a drink, they could just say “strawberries”. Why would they need to say that strawberries, or any other ingredient, also has a “natural flavor”? How is “flavor” even an ingredient?
So now from the Q perspective, would you want to stop this practice behind the scenes (possibly by blowing up cabal food factories) and then never reveal what they did, or blow them up and then do a big disclosure that yourself and everyone you know has been eating human meat for years and now can’t do anything about it? And how would people react to that? Would they thank Q or would they turn on Q for revealing something disgusting that they never wanted to know?
That’s the thing about the 60% that Q says must stay classified. Everyone thinks it’s just morbid details about evil things the cabal did, like the specific ways they tortured kids. I think it goes beyond that. I think it’s things that when Q Team found out, they almost regretted learning it, because it’s so horrible, and now they feel they’d rather just stop it quietly behind the scenes without having to put everyone through the disgust they experienced. And again, they also have to negotiate disclosure around what people are willing to accept. What is the point of them revealing it all only to have 90% of people reject it? Wouldn’t it be better to reveal 40% and get public acceptance?
ALL 501c3 orgs. Including religious organizations. The hardest "red pill" for the so called "AWAKE and Right" humans to acknowledge. May become a suppository for a lot of the "self-righteous" but will be completed in order for true Awakening to occur. There will be "no going back". Dark to LIGHT
It makes me think of Moses taking his people out of Egypt. They were good for a bit until things got threatening or difficult. Then there was the moaning that they were better off enslaved back in Egypt where at least they had the food they wanted, etc.
I agree with this. I find it very difficult to question the main narrative behind 9/11, at least as far as some people go. Building 7 raises some questions but without conclusive evidence I can't go based solely on speculation and likelihood of events alone.
What about the lack of any planes at the Pentagon and that crash site where there was just a crater?
I never looked into this in detail as it is emotionally difficult and if true, what is the point in knowing is the sad part.
I will say I have a very hard time believing any calls were made from the airplanes unless they were some kind of plane phone. That part has never made sense to me.
While there were phones built into some planes back then, mostly jumbo jets, you'd think the hijackers would have switched them off immediately since they're enabled from the flight cabin so they're not used at certain times like take-off and landing. So yeah, the call thing always sounded made up.
I remember standing there in shock watching News coverage. I remember seeing the video of the Pentagon. I very quickly was wondering about it. "Where's the plane?" I didnt have everything put together back then, but when resources became available to me online, I was already primed for the info.
I think the reason to know, is so that the whole picture makes sense, you can see the lengths they are willing to go to for their objectives and it helps prove that there Is an issue.
It is painful, but there is a reason to know in this case. At least the basics that it was lies.
I realize this is a long vid, but personally I found it the most compelling argument I've ever seen on what really happened on 9/11. Lots of evidence presented in there, with a takeaway that differs greatly from the typical reasons given.
https://rumble.com/v2whir6-where-did-the-towers-go.html
Dr. Judy Wood does a stand-up job (IMO) detailing how the towers were taken down with directed energy weapons. Sounds crazy? Wait till you see her proof. She proves this from multiple angles and in the process disproves most of the other prevailing theories.
Much more likely planted explosives, there was major work done on the elevators in the months before hand and that's the perfect place to hide charges for imploding a skyscraper. Making things fantastical with energy weapons 1) turns off normies starting to awaken and 2) is just clickbaity in general.
How do you explain the lack of falling mass registered on the seismographs? Despite being far more mass than the King Dome (which was a controlled explosion), it registered far far lower on the seismographs.
Also, how do you explain cars on the bridge that had their engine blocks melted in place?
How do you explain the video evidence of steel girders falling off the building and literally turning to dust before they hit the ground?
How do you explain the bathtub (I think that's what they called it - it was part of the foundation designed to hold out river water I believe) having next to no damage, despite having a mountain of steel and concrete falling on top of it? How come there was next to no damage in the parkade just below ground level?
There's far more in the presentation, but those are some of the points I could remember (it's been five plus years since I saw it last).
I agree there was lots of shenanigans happening in the towers prior - but part of that was also moving out a ginormous amount of physical gold.
If the DEW theory is correct, it is still feasible that they would have planted explosives in the towers to aid in the pyrotechnics of the theatre...
She actually avoids the fantastical and tries not to make conclusions, only observations. Her presentation is very interesting. The way the towers dustified into nothing doesn’t align with any physics I’m aware of. That is sort of her main point. Also, how areas on the ground look like a bomb went off, only the leaves on the trees are totally unharmed.
Interesting viewpoint.
Repugnant, and possible.