Should be easy enoug to proove by dragging Ruby and her.moms fat ass in there day 1.
So, I would do that as a last resort. Bring in all the evidence that hasnt been heard or seen its day in court. Prove every ounce of it. Smallest to largest. Then pull in the Freemans at the end as icing on the cake.
There were several hundred sworn affidavits of fraud. That's not even considering the physical evidence. Jack Smith doesn't even know what he just opened.
I don't mean to doom, but the judge in this case looks to be corrupt. How can we be confident that such evidence will be ruled as admissible? Is there some legal doctrine that will force the judge's hand?
I don't think you realize how weak this case is. Smith is claiming Trump KNEW the Election was not stolen. This opens Discovery for Trump to use all evidence refuting that claim from the prosecution.
If she attempts to prevent all that evidence in Discovery she exposes the entire trial as a fraud, with her as the conductor.
Wouldn’t it be awesome if they bring in pallets of hard drives, reams of paperwork, sworn testimony and file cabinet’s of election fraud proof and just set it next to the defense’s table. The expert testimony is going to be massive. I believe the dog has finally caught the car, no Peterbilt. Pray
I keep reading that this will be an opportunity for President Trump to bring in all the proof. Personally, I don’t believe they will allow this show trial to progress that far. I wouldn’t be surprised if they suddenly dropped it altogether, rather than risk the exposure.
It will be quick once we get to experience the "event". The information will then cascade like a waterfall.
...drip drip FLOOD.
Flooding does happen after a storm event.
Should be easy enoug to proove by dragging Ruby and her.moms fat ass in there day 1.
So, I would do that as a last resort. Bring in all the evidence that hasnt been heard or seen its day in court. Prove every ounce of it. Smallest to largest. Then pull in the Freemans at the end as icing on the cake.
There were several hundred sworn affidavits of fraud. That's not even considering the physical evidence. Jack Smith doesn't even know what he just opened.
"... the volume could take YEARS to go through."
Isn't that what the Deep State is counting on?
I don't mean to doom, but the judge in this case looks to be corrupt. How can we be confident that such evidence will be ruled as admissible? Is there some legal doctrine that will force the judge's hand?
I don't think you realize how weak this case is. Smith is claiming Trump KNEW the Election was not stolen. This opens Discovery for Trump to use all evidence refuting that claim from the prosecution.
If she attempts to prevent all that evidence in Discovery she exposes the entire trial as a fraud, with her as the conductor.
So be it. Military is the only way.
Doesnt even matter. Any shenanigans and this will end up at the supreme court anyway
problem is that it might in a Washington DC court. we saw that with Durham
but i still believe there is a plan
Wouldn’t it be awesome if they bring in pallets of hard drives, reams of paperwork, sworn testimony and file cabinet’s of election fraud proof and just set it next to the defense’s table. The expert testimony is going to be massive. I believe the dog has finally caught the car, no Peterbilt. Pray
Trump Card I would say!
How soon before they realize the impact of “discovery” and drop all charges?
The Deep State and their thug attorney Jack Smith have stepped in the squishy, smelly Trump dump!
We don't have years... Let's go ahead and wrap it up in a few weeks, mmmkay? Great.... /S
It will be like watching a long movie.
I keep reading that this will be an opportunity for President Trump to bring in all the proof. Personally, I don’t believe they will allow this show trial to progress that far. I wouldn’t be surprised if they suddenly dropped it altogether, rather than risk the exposure.
It's an antitrump judge in a dc courtroom. This type of discovery most likely won't be allowed.