That's what I started pondering after reading THIS article.
****************************** E D I T ******************************
I started this thread before watching THIS video originally posted by DCGRITS in his thread HERE.
It all makes perfect sense now. JFK created the special forces before he was killed. He knew there had to be a section that wasn't controlled by the Deep State. I now believe there is a section of our military that is still part of the Republic. The rest of the military is owned by the corporation.
A VERY powerful set of lectures / talks here from David Straight. Explaining about law and legal, about jurisdiction of the Land, the Air and the Water (LAW). aka asset law, trust law, commercial law.
This sort of content is critical in getting a handle on the concept of how there are TWO entities: the USA and the US. The Republic and the Corporation.
I cannot confirm how much he says is factual, but it has the ring of truth in it, and it intersects with what I know about law vs legal. His claims about him and DJT, etc, are impressive, but again, unverified.
On a positive note, I looked up his name and he is described by the Anti-Defamation League (aka Marxist) website as:
I'm still listening. At this point, I'd say his content is a must-listen for patriots in the United States of America. Even to just hear the ideas. It should help shed light on the Republic vs Corporation paradigm.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ex7cZ64hBSE
Five Part Seminar - David Straight (You can see all five sections at the channel below.)
https://www.youtube.com/@saltystrawman/videos
Attn:
u/Morpheus11
u/MAG768720
MORE FANTASY with ZERO Basis in Law or Legalese....
Just a bunch of Clowns speaking in Common Daily Slango....
So you don't find any significance in Trump re-truthing the Jan Halper-Hayes video talking about the US Corporation being dissolved for a transition back to the Republic?
Oh I'm not saying that at all, there IS somewhat of a Corporation built up inside of the Republic, but it isn't at all what the Fantasy Story Tellers are saying it is....
It's like a Mirror Image of the Republic, except that all of the Rules of the Republic still apply, and so do all of the Imaginative Rules of the Image also apply, but it all depends upon the context of the situation as to which specific Rules can be applied....
It's a Dual System, but the Corporation that SHE is speaking about, is all the Unconstitutional Agencies created Inside of the Republic, and there are many more than the PUBLIC knows of....
David Straight is a mixed bag. I've listened to quite a bit of his stuff and also heard many criticisms from his former students.
Let's just say the guy is quite likely a pathological liar, especially when it comes to his own achievements and accomplishments in particular.
I don't trust him, even though he is sharing many truths about the legal-lawful clusterfork he's learned over the years.
One guy I know has been researching all these gurus for the past 4 years and brings forth a fairly objective look at who is on the up-and-up, versus those that are questionable. I'm not particularly impressed with him in general, but he's interacted with the vast majority of people out there in this space --- more than anybody else I'm aware of. It's worth considering his position. Here are some recent videos where he covers this. You'll have to fast-forward through all the opening BS to get to the meat of both of these videos. They're long and winding but the analysis is in there.
https://odysee.com/@ricecrypto:2/My-Truth-About-The-Legal-Fiction_:4?lid=3f5d80a3-0a8f-41f4-97e0-906f738490e9
https://odysee.com/@ricecrypto:2/YouCantHandleMy-Part-2:6
I've arrived at similar conclusions. David Straight and Anna Von Reitz are two of the more popular figures in the US. They have a lot of valuable information to share, but ultimately they have also failed many of their followers. This idea of "status correction" isn't what it's cracked up to be. And in many cases, gets people into more trouble than they were originally in.
Good to have your input. I'll need to listen more to make any serious assessment, and until then, its parked in the (taking in the information) section.
Some of his personalized claims did sound a bit over-the-top.
I agree with the assessment of u/Morpheus11. Having listened to about 20 hours of Straight nonsense from David, I'm convinced he's perhaps the most dangerous kind of liar - the kind that believes their own lies. Sure, there are some sound principles in what he is teaching. How does one differentiate between the accurate vs the B.S.? It was as you mentioned, his personalized claims that really did it for me. So many claims of a close connection with Trump. Trump this, Trump that.
Just to name a few I recall: Trump has entrusted DAVID with waking up the people. He was on a helicopter with Trump and JFK Jr. and they landed on top of Mt. Rushmore. He knows exactly who Q is. He has Trumps new declaration of independence (never before shared) and read it on a video. (text I found elsewhere on the web, an intelligent person wrote but I'm sure it was a civilian) He is on the inside track with Trump for EVERYTHING that's going on.
If any of this insider stuff were true, he would NOT be talking about it. He would not be sharing any of THE PLAN on his videos and leaking information as he is about THE PLAN. He would not be bragging about his connection to Trump. Trump would never in a million years entrust someone like David with any of this information.
THEREFORE David is a Straight up liar and conman. I wouldn't dare follow any of his information.
An interesting and wild concept he talked about was Cestui Que Vie Trust. We're all trust fund babies. We're rich. We can pay bills and even purchase assets with our trust funds. Amazing!
Wow. You listened to 20 hours? That's marathon.
You make some interesting comments. Obviously a longer listen is necessary, but assuming your are right, the sad thing is that much of what he talks about is at least partially factual. THe issues of the law, the constitution, innate rights, commercial and statue law, etc - these are very real, as far as I can see.
But as Morpheus points out, folks like DS become gurus to certain people and folks can get into trouble when they act on incorrect information or limited understandings.
I obviously need to listen more; it seems I jumped the gun in recommending this fellow because some of the things he spoke about resonate and ARE factual, as far as I can see.
But narcissists, conmen, deceivers, etc, always mix truth with lies. The respect for truth only exists as a matter on convenience, when it serves. Elsewise, it is abandoned.
Thanks for the comment.