I feel like I have been programmed to not listen to legal speech. It seems like the most boring subject ever. Second only to banking policy which I can't stand to listen to either.
But I have listened to this several times. Both Trump and General Flynn have reposted this:
We all have to make an effort to atleast not get turned off by legal speech, even if we dont understand much, simply because we ignore it at our own peril. Just like we cant ignore the ingredient list on food and medicine packaging, no matter how long or how many numbers in there, if we are planning to consume that food or medicine.
But I feel this weird compulsion to turn away when I hear it. That was my point. It feels unnatural. I am interested in so many subjects, but law and banking I feel a revulsion. So I'm wondering why that is?
By design. These are two subjects they dont want the populace to pay too much attention.
First they make it dry and overload with too much info. Then they depict them as boring subjects in pop culture. On top of that we know both are filled with corrupt people.
Because we are all fraudulently enrolled into the corporate system upon birth (birth certificate=ownership) and our continued participation in that system is 100% voluntary. Anyone with the knowledge of how to kill the contracts they have unknowingly entered into is free to leave at any time.
Did you know that when you claim to be a citizen you are actually claiming residence in the foreign corporate jurisdiction of the District of Columbia? Legally speaking, that is.
Lack of discipline? Laws and banking concern themselves primarily with human desire and not purely abstract or mechanical processes, as such, they are not centered around logic but compromise.
Understand the need for that compromise, and how compromise itself is an actual art form. Also, go back and read legal opinions from 100 years ago. The subject will blow your mind. Modern courts have become corruption machines, but that shouldn't pervert your search and understanding of the truth.
I feel like I have been programmed to not listen to legal speech. It seems like the most boring subject ever. Second only to banking policy which I can't stand to listen to either.
But I have listened to this several times. Both Trump and General Flynn have reposted this:
https://twitter.com/pepedownunder/status/1687785283599892481
So I think this is a real thing.
We all have to make an effort to atleast not get turned off by legal speech, even if we dont understand much, simply because we ignore it at our own peril. Just like we cant ignore the ingredient list on food and medicine packaging, no matter how long or how many numbers in there, if we are planning to consume that food or medicine.
I agree.
But I feel this weird compulsion to turn away when I hear it. That was my point. It feels unnatural. I am interested in so many subjects, but law and banking I feel a revulsion. So I'm wondering why that is?
By design. These are two subjects they dont want the populace to pay too much attention.
First they make it dry and overload with too much info. Then they depict them as boring subjects in pop culture. On top of that we know both are filled with corrupt people.
Because we are all fraudulently enrolled into the corporate system upon birth (birth certificate=ownership) and our continued participation in that system is 100% voluntary. Anyone with the knowledge of how to kill the contracts they have unknowingly entered into is free to leave at any time.
Did you know that when you claim to be a citizen you are actually claiming residence in the foreign corporate jurisdiction of the District of Columbia? Legally speaking, that is.
https://onestupidfuck.com/state-national-theory
Lack of discipline? Laws and banking concern themselves primarily with human desire and not purely abstract or mechanical processes, as such, they are not centered around logic but compromise.
Understand the need for that compromise, and how compromise itself is an actual art form. Also, go back and read legal opinions from 100 years ago. The subject will blow your mind. Modern courts have become corruption machines, but that shouldn't pervert your search and understanding of the truth.
Cognitive dissonance?
It's imperative we do try and get over this and I'm as guilty as anyone.
Both legalese and banking paperwork is intentionally ridiculous so that we have this exact reaction.
Wow. I need to listen to this again. Totally new info to me.
Same for voting