"Trust Grassley"...... Is this INTEL INFO that 'Q' is conveying or is it DISINFO that 'Q' also told us was necessary? At this point I don't know. Ivan Raiklin, who first Tweeted the Constitutional procedure outlined in Article 12 for a contested election, and was Re-Tweeted by President Trump, but then was picked up by the Mockingbird Media as a "plan" called "operation Pence Card", has a very interesting insight to the January 6th confirmation proceeding.
There's far more to this than most Americans know. It was attorney Ivan Raiklin, who educated me on this. Senator Grassley may not be a White Hat at all. Over time, I've heard both sides of the argument, but I believed 'Q' saying, "Trust Grassley", and I went along with this belief.
At 1:02 PM, Jan.6th, Mike Pence sends out a Tweet stating he does not have unilateral ability to allocate the electors. He then say, "its for the House (of Representatives) to decide". Three minutes later at 1:05 PM, after the in-session gaveling, Nancy Pelosi stated, "due to the advice of the House and Senate Sergeant at Arms and the Health Official, we're only allowing 11 members, Democrat and Republicans of the House, 11 members of the Senate to participate in the joint session". That's 22 in the House out of 435. And 22 members in the Senate out of 100. The only place that it talks about the joint session in the Constitution is the 12th Amendment. And in there, it talks about a quorum. For this particular instance, the 12th Amendment defines a quorum to be a representative (at least one) from each State. At least 34 representatives were required in the House and 25 members from the Senate. Anyway one looks at it, the 12th Amendment was violated by Nancy Pelosi. However, Pelosi is not the ultimate authority here. Mike Pence is the presiding officer being the president of Congress. Pence then initiated the joint session. This was captured by C-SPAN. Congressman Morgan Griffith from the 9th congressional district of Virginia stands up and says, "point of order!" and trying to get the attention of Nancy Pelosi after she does the eleventh. Ivan Raiklin surmises that Pelosi must of had an agreement with the leadership. She must have had agreement with McConnell, McCarthy, an Schumer. Congressman Morgan Griffith, who is a member of the Freedom Caucus, asks, "How are to participate in a joint session when we aren't even allowed on the floor and we are [currently] in the gallery? How are going to make a point of order or object. We have no mechanism." Pence responds by telling him no objections will be allowed. What Pence did was unilaterally deny over 90% of the House and Senate body in the collective to participate in the constitutionally required joint session. Pence violated the Constitution by, one, not allowing the legal slates on December 23, and two, by unlawfully not allow Congress to participate in the joint session.
As soon as this was done, Ray Epps who was in charge of getting the crowds to the capital building and headed the outer breach. He worked in coordination with the scaffold commander, who had a megaphone enticing everyone to, "Come to the capital!" Come to the capital!" Ray Epps was stationed at the base of the capital building with the scaffold commander above him. The inner breach leader was John Sullivan. This was the BLM leader during the George Floyd riots in Minneapolis, and elsewhere. Previously he is spotted with Pelosi's son-in-law at a nearby hotel the day before. On January 5th, Ray Epps is photographed with John Sullivan standing next to him. Sullivan was stationed at the Senate side of the capital. As soon as enough people gathered in front of the capital building, Sullivan's team and his inner breach team, in coordination with perhaps Nancy Pelosi's son-in-law, being used as a cutout to facilitate the communication with the Senate Sergeant At Arms and later the House Sergeant At Arms, to allow the unlawful entry in to the US capital building. John Sullivan had a photographer with him recording the events so that the footage could be immediately sent to CNN and MSNBC to get paid tens of thousands of dollars for their footage of the insurrection. Once the protesters are inside the rotunda, Mike Pence then acts, according to Liz Cheney, by saying, "It wasn't Donald Trump that ordered the DHS, the DOJ, and the military to assist the capital police, it was Mike Pence". As Vice President, what authority does Mike Pence have to order the Executive branch? The Vice President does only under one circumstance. It is found under the 25th Amendment, section 4, that provides the ability to remove the President of the United States from office so that the Vice President can become the President of the United States.
Did that happen? Is it possible they did this for a few hours without people knowing?
Under Section 4, of the 25th Amendment the Vice President is to hold a cabinet vote for removal of the President. It is required that it is consummated in a memo sent to the Speaker of the House and the president pro tempore of the Senate, who was Senator Chuck Grassley at the time. So far there is no known evidence of this occurring. Did Senator Chuck Grassley receive the memo? No one has put Mr. Grassley under oath to have him answer this question. There was a coup d'état on January 6. Mike Pence committed treason, not once by refusing legal slates, not twice by excluding over 90% of the House and Senate from participating in the joint session, but perhaps usurping the authority of the President of the United States in a secret and unlawful vote for his removal.
Only question I see off the bat... Iowa is Central time, not Mountain, so the time match for the qdrop would be 1027, not 1127. And they do participate in DS time.
You are an underappreciated poster, brother. Maybe people just arent smart enough to understand your high quality proofs.
Five minutes of inspection is all it took for my mouth to drop so I’d have to agree. Kudos VFD.
Thank you both LTL and HSTA, very kind much appreciated!
https://twitter.com/ChuckGrassley/status/1690384589796020224
"Trust Grassley"...... Is this INTEL INFO that 'Q' is conveying or is it DISINFO that 'Q' also told us was necessary? At this point I don't know. Ivan Raiklin, who first Tweeted the Constitutional procedure outlined in Article 12 for a contested election, and was Re-Tweeted by President Trump, but then was picked up by the Mockingbird Media as a "plan" called "operation Pence Card", has a very interesting insight to the January 6th confirmation proceeding.
There's far more to this than most Americans know. It was attorney Ivan Raiklin, who educated me on this. Senator Grassley may not be a White Hat at all. Over time, I've heard both sides of the argument, but I believed 'Q' saying, "Trust Grassley", and I went along with this belief.
At 1:02 PM, Jan.6th, Mike Pence sends out a Tweet stating he does not have unilateral ability to allocate the electors. He then say, "its for the House (of Representatives) to decide". Three minutes later at 1:05 PM, after the in-session gaveling, Nancy Pelosi stated, "due to the advice of the House and Senate Sergeant at Arms and the Health Official, we're only allowing 11 members, Democrat and Republicans of the House, 11 members of the Senate to participate in the joint session". That's 22 in the House out of 435. And 22 members in the Senate out of 100. The only place that it talks about the joint session in the Constitution is the 12th Amendment. And in there, it talks about a quorum. For this particular instance, the 12th Amendment defines a quorum to be a representative (at least one) from each State. At least 34 representatives were required in the House and 25 members from the Senate. Anyway one looks at it, the 12th Amendment was violated by Nancy Pelosi. However, Pelosi is not the ultimate authority here. Mike Pence is the presiding officer being the president of Congress. Pence then initiated the joint session. This was captured by C-SPAN. Congressman Morgan Griffith from the 9th congressional district of Virginia stands up and says, "point of order!" and trying to get the attention of Nancy Pelosi after she does the eleventh. Ivan Raiklin surmises that Pelosi must of had an agreement with the leadership. She must have had agreement with McConnell, McCarthy, an Schumer. Congressman Morgan Griffith, who is a member of the Freedom Caucus, asks, "How are to participate in a joint session when we aren't even allowed on the floor and we are [currently] in the gallery? How are going to make a point of order or object. We have no mechanism." Pence responds by telling him no objections will be allowed. What Pence did was unilaterally deny over 90% of the House and Senate body in the collective to participate in the constitutionally required joint session. Pence violated the Constitution by, one, not allowing the legal slates on December 23, and two, by unlawfully not allow Congress to participate in the joint session.
As soon as this was done, Ray Epps who was in charge of getting the crowds to the capital building and headed the outer breach. He worked in coordination with the scaffold commander, who had a megaphone enticing everyone to, "Come to the capital!" Come to the capital!" Ray Epps was stationed at the base of the capital building with the scaffold commander above him. The inner breach leader was John Sullivan. This was the BLM leader during the George Floyd riots in Minneapolis, and elsewhere. Previously he is spotted with Pelosi's son-in-law at a nearby hotel the day before. On January 5th, Ray Epps is photographed with John Sullivan standing next to him. Sullivan was stationed at the Senate side of the capital. As soon as enough people gathered in front of the capital building, Sullivan's team and his inner breach team, in coordination with perhaps Nancy Pelosi's son-in-law, being used as a cutout to facilitate the communication with the Senate Sergeant At Arms and later the House Sergeant At Arms, to allow the unlawful entry in to the US capital building. John Sullivan had a photographer with him recording the events so that the footage could be immediately sent to CNN and MSNBC to get paid tens of thousands of dollars for their footage of the insurrection. Once the protesters are inside the rotunda, Mike Pence then acts, according to Liz Cheney, by saying, "It wasn't Donald Trump that ordered the DHS, the DOJ, and the military to assist the capital police, it was Mike Pence". As Vice President, what authority does Mike Pence have to order the Executive branch? The Vice President does only under one circumstance. It is found under the 25th Amendment, section 4, that provides the ability to remove the President of the United States from office so that the Vice President can become the President of the United States.
Did that happen? Is it possible they did this for a few hours without people knowing?
Under Section 4, of the 25th Amendment the Vice President is to hold a cabinet vote for removal of the President. It is required that it is consummated in a memo sent to the Speaker of the House and the president pro tempore of the Senate, who was Senator Chuck Grassley at the time. So far there is no known evidence of this occurring. Did Senator Chuck Grassley receive the memo? No one has put Mr. Grassley under oath to have him answer this question. There was a coup d'état on January 6. Mike Pence committed treason, not once by refusing legal slates, not twice by excluding over 90% of the House and Senate from participating in the joint session, but perhaps usurping the authority of the President of the United States in a secret and unlawful vote for his removal.
Thanks for the great effort here ☝️
Brilliant. I'm requesting a sticky.
Try searching "bunker forest blue Hawaii".
DuckDuckGo: "No results found"
https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=%22bunker+forest+blue+Hawaii%22&ia=web
Google: "It looks like there aren't many great matches for your search"
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=%22bunker+forest+blue+Hawaii%22
Remove the quotes so it isn't whole term.
This is the kind of stuff I was getting:
https://www.hawaiifunshine.com/2016/10/06/concealed-abandoned-bunker/
https://www.bizjournals.com/pacific/news/2015/08/07/former-hawaii-military-bunkers-turned-storage.html
https://www.onlyinyourstate.com/hawaii/ehukai-pillboxes-hike-hi/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X53-ef15THk
https://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/2018/12/05/decades-later-landmarks-popular-oahu-hikes-now-unintentional-symbols-hawaiis-military-past/
Maybe coincidence but seemed odd for Grassley to just bring that in and Hawaii being hit with all its bunkers recently.
The first one stated that they walked and ended up at a rich persons home. Made me wonder who lived there.
https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/money-and-power/a39566681/billionaires-in-hawaii-history/
https://usabynumbers.com/richest-person-in-hawaii/
I read somewhere there were a bunch of DUMBs there. Trafficking? Tunnels like Playboy mansion?
Hmm, yes 🤔
Thanks OP for putting Grassley's name in Orange on the posts. I would have never made the connection.
But seriously, good find.
Wow! Edit: user name checks out.
Dasting..
Only question I see off the bat... Iowa is Central time, not Mountain, so the time match for the qdrop would be 1027, not 1127. And they do participate in DS time.
1027